Gastrojejunostomy versus endoscopic stenting for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Khamar, Jigish [1 ]
Lee, Yung [2 ]
Sachdeva, Anjali [3 ]
Anpalagan, Tharani [1 ]
McKechnie, Tyler [2 ]
Eskicioglu, Cagla [2 ,4 ]
Agzarian, John [2 ,4 ]
Doumouras, Aristithes [2 ,4 ]
Hong, Dennis [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Michael G DeGroote Sch Med, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Div Gen Surg, St Josephs Healthcare, Room G814,50 Charlton Ave East, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Surg, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES | 2023年 / 37卷 / 06期
关键词
Gastrojejunostomy; Endoscopic Stenting; Gastric Outlet Obstruction; Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery; LAPAROSCOPIC GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY; GASTRODUODENAL OBSTRUCTION; SURGICAL GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY; PLACEMENT; CANCER; SECONDARY; OUTCOMES; THERAPY; BYPASS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-022-09572-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Though gastrojejunostomy (GJ) has been a standard palliative procedure for gastric outlet obstruction (GOO), endoscopic stenting (ES) has shown to provide benefits due to its non-invasive approach. The aim of this review is to perform a comprehensive evaluation of ES versus GJ for the palliation of malignant GOO. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched and comparative studies of adult GOO patients undergoing ES or GJ were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes were survival time and mortality. Secondary outcomes included technical success, clinical success, reinterventions, days until oral food tolerance, postoperative adjuvant palliative chemotherapy, postoperative morbidities, length of stay (LOS), and costs. Pairwise meta-analyses using inverse-variance random effects were performed. Results After identifying 2222 citations, 39 full-text articles fit the inclusion criteria. In total, 3128 ES patients (41.4% female, age: 68.0 years) and 2116 GJ patients (40.4% female, age: 66.8 years) were included. ES patients experienced a shorter survival time (mean difference -24.77 days, 95% Cl - 45.11 to - 4.43, p = 0.02) and were less likely to undergo adjuvant palliative chemotherapy (risk ratio 0.81, 95% Cl 0.70 to 0.93, p = 0.004). The ES group had a shorter LOS, shorter time to oral intake of liquids and solids, and less surgical site infections (risk ratio 0.30, 95% Cl 0.12 to 0.75, p = 0.01). The patients in the ES group were at greater risk of requiring reintervention (risk ratio 2.60, 95% Cl 1.87 to 3.63, p < 0.001). Conclusion ES results in less postoperative morbidity and shorter LOS when compared to GJ, however, this may be at the cost of decreased initiation of adjuvant palliative chemotherapy and overall survival, as well as increased risk of reintervention. Both techniques are likely appropriate in select clinical scenarios. [GRAPHICS] .
引用
收藏
页码:4834 / 4868
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Palliative Treatment of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Stent versus Gastrojejunostomy
    Mueller, Marc A.
    Caca, Karel
    VISZERALMEDIZIN, 2010, 26 (02): : 84 - 88
  • [42] Surgical gastrojejunostomy or endoscopic stent placement for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (SUSTENT study): a multicenter randomized trial
    Jeurnink, Suzanne M.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    van Hooft, Jeanin E.
    van Eijck, Casper H. J.
    Schwartz, Matthijs P.
    Vleggaar, Frank P.
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    Siersema, Peter D.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (03) : 490 - 499
  • [43] Stenting versus gastrojejunostomy for management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: comparison of clinical outcomes and costs
    Roy, Ann
    Kim, Micheline
    Christein, John
    Varadarajulu, Shyam
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (11): : 3114 - 3119
  • [44] Complications After Endoscopic Stenting for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Cohort Study
    Sterpetti, Antonio V.
    Fiori, Enrico
    Sapienza, Paolo
    Lamazza, Antonietta
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2019, 29 (03): : 169 - 172
  • [45] A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing partial stomach partitioning gastrojejunostomy versus conventional gastrojejunostomy for malignant gastroduodenal obstruction
    Kumagai, Koshi
    Rouvelas, Ioannis
    Ernberg, Annika
    Persson, Saga
    Analatos, Apostolos
    Mariosa, Daniela
    Lindblad, Mats
    Nilsson, Magnus
    Ye, Weimin
    Lundell, Lars
    Tsai, Jon A.
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2016, 401 (06) : 777 - 785
  • [46] Malignant gastric outlet obstruction managed by endoscopic stenting: a prospective single-centre study
    Havemann, Maria Cecilie
    Adamsen, Sven
    Wojdemann, Morten
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 44 (02) : 248 - 251
  • [47] EUS-guided gastroenterostomy versus surgical gastroenterostomy for the management of gastric outlet obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kumar, Anand
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Atla, Pradeep R.
    McCabe, Evin J.
    Robbins, David H.
    Trindade, Arvind J.
    Benias, Petros C.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (04) : E448 - E458
  • [48] Endoscopic management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction
    Ye, Bing-Wei
    Lee, Kuei-Chuan
    Hou, Ming-Chih
    JOURNAL OF THE CHINESE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 84 (04) : 346 - 353
  • [49] Unilateral versus bilateral endoscopic stenting in patients with unresectable malignant hilar obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meybodi, Mohamad Aghaie
    Shakoor, Delaram
    Nanavati, Julie
    Ichkhanian, Yervant
    Vosoughi, Kia
    Gutierrez, Olaya I. Brewer
    Kalloo, Anthony N.
    Singh, Vikesh
    Kumbhari, Vivek
    Ngamruengphong, Saowanee
    Khashab, Mouen A.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2020, 8 (03) : E281 - E290
  • [50] Stenting versus gastrojejunostomy for management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction: comparison of clinical outcomes and costs
    Ann Roy
    Micheline Kim
    John Christein
    Shyam Varadarajulu
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2012, 26 : 3114 - 3119