Clinical outcomes of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns and fixed partial dentures: A systematic review

被引:15
作者
Kim, Wanjin [1 ]
Li, Xiao Chun [1 ]
Bidra, Avinash S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Reconstruct Sci, Hlth Ctr, 263 Farmington Ave,L7039, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | 2023年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词
fixed partial denture survival; implant restoration; monolithic zirconia; single crown survival; RESTORATIONS; PROSTHESES; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1111/jopr.13575
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose To determine the survival rates of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns and fixed partial dentures (FPD). Material and methods An electronic search for articles in the English language literature published from January 1, 2001 to September 17, 2021 was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and CENTRAL search engines. After applying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, the definitive list of selected articles was used for calculating the interval survival rate (ISR) and cumulative survival rate (CSR). Restoration failure in this study was defined as the fracture or compromise of any part of the ceramic restoration that required the removal or remake of the implant-supported restoration. Results The electronic search resulted in 457 titles. The systematic application of inclusion and exclusion criteria resulted in 14 clinical studies that addressed the clinical outcomes of implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns and fixed partial dentures. Of these, 3 were randomized controlled trials, 5 were prospective studies, and 6 were retrospective studies. Follow-up periods ranged from 1 to 5 years. Of the 644 implant-supported monolithic zirconia restorations computed in this systematic review, there was only 1 reported failure of the monolithic zirconia restorative material over a follow-up period of up to 5 years, for a cumulative survival rate of 99.84%. At the maximum follow-up interval of 5 years, the cumulative survival rate for monolithic zirconia single crowns was 100% and the cumulative survival rate for monolithic zirconia fixed partial dentures was 99.60%. Conclusions Implant-supported monolithic zirconia single crowns and fixed partial dentures have excellent short-term (<5 years) survival rates but the evidence for medium-term survival (>5 years) and beyond is lacking.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of Replacing Conventional Complete Dentures with Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dentures
    Compagnoni, Marco Antonio
    Paeari, Andre Gustavo
    Rodriguez, Larissa Santana
    Giro, Gabriela
    Mendoza Marin, Danny Omar
    Pero, Ana Carolina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 34 (06) : 833 - 839
  • [22] Complications and Patient-Centered Outcomes with an Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Dental Prosthesis: 1 Year Results
    Limmer, Bryan
    Sanders, Anne E.
    Reside, Glenn
    Cooper, Lyndon F.
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 23 (04): : 267 - 275
  • [23] Clinical Results and Technical Complications of Posterior Implant-Supported Modified Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns and Short-Span Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 2-Year Pilot Study
    Cheng, Chih-Wen
    Chien, Chia-Hui
    Chen, Chun-Jung
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (02): : 108 - 114
  • [24] The impact of cantilevers on biological and technical success outcomes of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. A retrospective cohort study
    Kim, Paul
    Ivanovski, Saso
    Latcham, Neil
    Mattheos, Nikos
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (02) : 175 - 184
  • [25] Diagnostic Classification and Design Considerations for Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures and Screw Access Channel: The ABC/PBC and SAC Classifications
    AlHelal, Abdulaziz
    Kattadiyil, Mathew T.
    Clark, Jefferson L.
    AlBader, Bader
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2017, 30 (05) : 490 - 495
  • [26] A Luting Technique for Passive Fit of Implant-Supported Fixed Dentures
    Menini, Maria
    Dellepiane, Elena
    Pera, Paolo
    Bevilacqua, Marco
    Pesce, Paolo
    Pera, Francesco
    Tealdo, Tiziano
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 25 (01): : 77 - 82
  • [27] Clinical and radiographic evaluations of implant-supported cantilever fixed partial dentures replacing maxillary anterior teeth: A randomized clinical trial
    Taha, Ahmed
    Al-Shahat, Mohamed A.
    Ghazy, Mohamed
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2020, 124 (06) : 659 - 666
  • [28] Clinical, Technical, and Radiologic Outcomes of 182 Implant-Supported Zirconia Single Crowns Using Titanium-Base Abutments: A Retrospective Study
    Guncu, Mustafa Baris
    Aktas, Guliz
    Guncu, Guliz N.
    Anil, Duygu
    Turkyilmaz, Ilser
    Antonoff, Lisa R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (04) : 553 - 559
  • [29] The Influence of Interproximal Contact on Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Dentures in the Posterior Jaw A Photoelastic Analysis
    Naves, Marina Melo
    Machado de Menezes, Helder Henrique
    de Magalhaes, Denildo
    de Araujo, Cleudmar Amaral
    Simamoto Junior, Paulo Cezar
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2015, 41 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [30] Survival of Intentionally Replanted Teeth and Implant-supported Single Crowns: A Systematic Review
    Torabinejad, Mahmoud
    Dinsbach, Nathan A.
    Turman, Michael
    Handysides, Robert
    Bahjri, Khaled
    White, Shane N.
    JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2015, 41 (07) : 992 - 998