Fake human but real influencer: the interplay of authenticity and humanlikeness in Virtual Influencer communication?

被引:8
作者
Ju, Naan [1 ]
Kim, Terry [2 ]
Im, Hyunjoo [2 ]
机构
[1] Dong A Univ, Dept Fash Design, 37 Nakdong Daero 550Beon Gil, Pusan 49315, South Korea
[2] Univ Minnesota Twin Cities, Dept Graph Design Apparel Design Retail Merchandis, Retail & Consumer Studies, 240 McNeal Hall,1985 Buford Ave, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
关键词
Virtual Influencer; Humanlikeness; Digital communication; Operator type; User engagement; COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION; SOCIAL MEDIA; TEXT ANALYSIS; BRAND; ENGAGEMENT; FOLLOWERS; MESSAGES; LANGUAGE; WORDS; PAGES;
D O I
10.1186/s40691-024-00380-0
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学]; TS1 [纺织工业、染整工业];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ; 0821 ;
摘要
Recently, there has been a lot of interest in industry and academia in virtual influencers (VIs). This study aimed to augment the understanding of VI marketing by exploring the relationship between VI's characteristics (i.e., their humanlikeness level and operator type), their social media post characteristics (i.e., emotional expression, use of pronouns, use of punctuation marks), and consumer engagement. The analysis of three popular VIs' Instagram profiles and posts revealed that VIs with less humanlike appearances tend to exhibit stronger positive emotional expressions. Interestingly, the level of humanlikeness in appearance was not associated with VI's other post characteristics, suggesting other intrinsic factors (e.g., the VI's character and virtual universe) may play a pivotal role. Whether a brand operates the VI or not made a statistically significant difference in the VI's post characteristics. Assessment of user engagement metrics (i.e., number of likes and comments) showed that users prefer hyper-realistic VIs and VIs operated by non-brand agencies, underscoring the importance of perceived authenticity in the digital realm. The emotions expressed by VIs, along with their use of punctuation, were positively related to user engagement.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 125 条
  • [51] Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality
    Freberg, Karen
    Graham, Kristin
    McGaughey, Karen
    Freberg, Laura A.
    [J]. PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2011, 37 (01) : 90 - 92
  • [52] Garcia D., 2017, CNBC
  • [53] Emoji rhetoric: a social media influencer perspective
    Ge, Jing
    Gretzel, Ulrike
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2018, 34 (15-16) : 1272 - 1295
  • [54] Geyser W., 2023, The State of Influencer Marketing 2022: Benchmark Report
  • [55] Goncalves P., 2013, P 1 ACM C ONLINE SOC, P27, DOI [DOI 10.1145/2512938.2512951, 10.1145/2512938.2512951]
  • [56] Greene William H., 2017, ECONOMETRIC ANAL, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.JCORPFIN.2006.05.002
  • [57] Hanc J., 2016, The New York Times
  • [58] Hearn A, 2016, COMPANION TO CELEBRITY, P194
  • [59] Hill R.Carter., 2001, UNDERGRADUATE ECONOM, VSecond
  • [60] Hiort A., 2022, MANY VIRTUAL INFLUEN