Isolation and in vitro assessment of chicken gut microbes for probiotic potential

被引:1
作者
Shahbaz, Fatima [1 ]
Muccee, Fatima [1 ]
Shahab, Aansa [1 ]
Safi, Sher Zaman [2 ]
Alomar, Suliman Yousef [3 ]
Qadeer, Abdul [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Punjab, Sch Biochem & Biotechnol, Lahore, Pakistan
[2] MAHSA Univ, Fac Med, Kuala Lumpur 56100, Malaysia
[3] King Saud Univ, Coll Sci, Dept Zool, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Cent South Univ, Sch Life Sci, Dept Cell Biol, Changsha, Peoples R China
关键词
probiotics; bile salts; gut; chicken; poultry; hemolysis; adhesion; LACTIC-ACID BACTERIA; LACTOBACILLUS-ACIDOPHILUS; CECAL MICROBIOTA; BROILER-CHICKENS; IDENTIFICATION; SALMONELLA; STRAINS; FECES;
D O I
10.3389/fmicb.2024.1278439
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Poultry production occupies an important place in the economy of any country. High broiler production in recent years has badly affected its profitability due to bad feed quality, excessive use of chemotherapeutic agents, emergence of diverse pathogens, and the deficiencies in management practices during rearing cycle. Microbiological improvement of the meat quality using potential probiotics can be beneficial for broiler farming. Present study was initiated to isolate chicken gastrointestinal tract (GIT) bacteria with probiotic potential. To isolate probiotics from chicken gut, alimentary canal of chickens of known sizes and ages was suspended in ringers soln. Under shaking conditions for overnight followed by serial dilutions of ringers soln. Bacterial isolates were analyzed via growth curve analysis, biochemical testing using RapID (TM) NF Plus Panel kit, molecular characterization, antimicrobial activity assay, antibiotic sensitivity assay, GIT adherence assay, bile salt and gastric acid resistant assay, and cholesterol assimilation assay. Four bacteria isolated in present study were identified as Limosilactobacillus antri strain PUPro1, Lactobacillus delbrueckii strain PUPro2, Lacticaseibacillus casei strain PUPro3, and Ligilactobacillus salivarius strain PUPro4. L. delbrueckii strain PUPro2 grew extremely fast. All isolates exhibited exceptional resistance to increasing concentrations of NaCl and bile salts with value of p >0.5. L. delbrueckii strain PUPro2 adhered to chicken ileum epithelial cells and demonstrated the highest viable counts of 320 colony forming units (CFUs). Antagonistic action was found in all isolates against P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis, B. proteus, and S. aureus, with value of p >0.5. Antibiotic susceptibility testing showed sensitivity to all the antibiotics used. Cholesterol assimilation was detected in all bacteria, with values ranging from 216.12 to 192.2 mg/dL. All isolates exhibited gamma-hemolysis. In future, these bacteria might be tested for their impact on broilers meat quality and growth and can be recommended for their use as supplements for broilers diet with positive impact on poultry production.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Isolation of bacterial consortia with probiotic potential from the rumen of tropical calves
    Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Sarahi
    Gonzalez-Davalos, Laura
    Robles-Rodriguez, Carolina
    Lozano-Flores, Carlos
    Varela-Echavarria, Alfredo
    Shimada, Armando
    Mora-Izaguirre, Ofelia
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND ANIMAL NUTRITION, 2023, 107 (01) : 62 - 76
  • [32] Isolation and characterization of dominant lactic acid bacteria from raw goat milk: Assessment of probiotic potential and technological properties
    Islam, Md. Zakirul
    Uddin, Md. Elias
    Rahman, Md. Tanvir
    Islam, Mohammad Ashiqul
    Harun-ur-Rashid, Md.
    SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2021, 205
  • [33] In vitro Assessment of the Probiotic Characteristics of Three Bacillus Species from the Gut of Nile Tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus
    Kuebutornye, Felix K. A.
    Lu, Yishan
    Abarike, Emmanuel Delwin
    Wang, Zhiwen
    Li, Yuan
    Sakyi, Michael Essien
    PROBIOTICS AND ANTIMICROBIAL PROTEINS, 2020, 12 (02) : 412 - 424
  • [34] Characterization and Evaluation of the Probiotic Potential In Vitro and In Situ of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei Isolated from Tenate Cheese
    Falfan-Cortes, Reyna N.
    Mora-Penaflor, Nancy
    Gomez-Aldapa, Carlos A.
    Rangel-Vargas, Esmeralda
    Acevedo-Sandoval, Otilio A.
    Franco-Fernandez, Meliton J.
    Castro-Rosas, Javier
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2022, 85 (01) : 112 - 121
  • [35] In-vitro assessment of the probiotic potential of Lactobacillus plantarum KCC-24 isolated from Italian rye-grass (Lolium multiflorum) forage
    Vijayakumar, Mayakrishnan
    Ilavenil, Soundharrajan
    Kim, Da Hye
    Arasu, Mariadhas Valan
    Priya, Kannappan
    Choi, Ki Choon
    ANAEROBE, 2015, 32 : 90 - 97
  • [36] Effect of Probiotic E. coli Nissle 1917 Supplementation on the Growth Performance, Immune Responses, Intestinal Morphology, and Gut Microbes of Campylobacter jejuni Infected Chickens
    Helmy, Yosra A.
    Closs Jr, Gary
    Jung, Kwonil
    Kathayat, Dipak
    Vlasova, Anastasia
    Rajashekara, Gireesh
    INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 2022, 90 (10)
  • [37] In vitro evaluation of the suitability potential probiotic of lactobacilli isolates from the gastrointestinal tract of chicken
    Zehra Nur Yuksekdag
    Nur Sahin
    Belma Aslim
    European Food Research and Technology, 2014, 239 : 313 - 320
  • [38] Isolation, identification, and potential probiotic characterization of isolated lactic acid bacteria and in vitro investigation of the cytotoxicity, antioxidant, and antidiabetic activities in fermented sausage
    AlKalbani, Nadia S.
    Turner, Mark S.
    Ayyash, Mutamed M.
    MICROBIAL CELL FACTORIES, 2019, 18 (01)
  • [39] Isolation and molecular identification of Lactobacillus with probiotic potential from abomasums driven rennet
    Kakelar, Hadi Maleki
    Barzegari, Abolfazl
    Hanifian, Shahram
    Barar, Jaleh
    Omidi, Yadollah
    FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2019, 272 : 709 - 714
  • [40] In Vitro Evaluation of the Probiotic Potential of Bacteriocin Producer Lactobacillus sakei 1
    Gomes, Bruna C.
    Rodrigues, Marina R.
    Winkelstroeter, Lizziane K.
    Nomizo, Auro
    De Martinis, Elaine C. P.
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2012, 75 (06) : 1083 - 1089