Emerging ESG reporting of higher education institutions in China

被引:3
作者
Mo, Fei [1 ]
Wang, Derek D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Foreign Studies Univ, Sch Int Org, 19 Xisanhuan North Rd, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Business Adm, 121 Zhangjialukou St, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Univ Econ & Business, China ESG Inst, 121 Zhangjialukou, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ESG; Sustainability reporting; Higher education institutions; China; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; UNIVERSITIES; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22527
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the ESG reporting practices of Chinese higher education institutions (HEIs). Based on Global Reporting Initiative's common reporting standards and the education sector-specific indicators proposed by earlier studies, we construct a disclosure framework of 112 indicators classified into environmental, social, governance, and educational dimensions. We manually collect all ESG-related information disclosed by 147 elite Chinese HEIs from various channels, including 8 standalone sustainability reports, around 600 annual reports, 139 charters, official websites, and official social media accounts, for the period 2020-2023. The results demonstrate how Chinese HEIs disclose different types of ESG information via different channels, with most of the information disclosed through channels other than standalone sustainability reports. Most Chinese HEIs do not adopt any specific disclosure standards but loosely follow the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in reporting. We further assess the quality of the disclosed information for each indicator and observe that, quality-wise, governance > educational > social > environmental, highlighting the necessity for Chinese HEIs to enhance environmental reporting. Next, we investigate the determinants of reporting quality and find that an HEI's number of faculty members is a more significant factor associated with its ESG reporting quality than other factors (i.e., number of students, funding, expenditure). Chinese HEIs are advised to report in a more balanced manner across the four dimensions in a standalone report using an education-oriented indicator-based framework instead of the current SDGs-based framework, to improve the completeness, materiality, and comparability of information.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [31] Ministry of Education, 2010, Information Disclosure Measures for Higher Education Institutions
  • [32] Ministry of Education, 2021, National Education Development Statistics Bulletin
  • [33] Ministry of Education, 2021, List of Higher Education Institutions Nationwide
  • [34] Ministry of Education Ministry of Finance National Development and Reform Commission, 2022, Notice on Announcing the Second-Round List of "Double First- Class"
  • [35] Investigating Web-Based Sustainability Reporting in Italian Public Universities in the Era of Covid-19
    Nicolo, Giuseppe
    Aversano, Natalia
    Sannino, Giuseppe
    Tartaglia Polcini, Paolo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [36] Assessment of sustainable development in technical higher education institutes of India
    Parvez, Nikhat
    Agrawal, Avlokita
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 214 : 975 - 994
  • [37] Peking University, 2021, UAS 2021 C NOTICE
  • [38] Peking University Guanghua School of Management, 2023, Carbon Footprint and Carbon Neutralization Action Report 2022
  • [39] Peking University Guanghua School of Management, 2022, Carbon Footprint Report 2021
  • [40] QS World University Rankings, 2023, QS World University Rankings 2024: Top global universities