Emerging ESG reporting of higher education institutions in China

被引:3
作者
Mo, Fei [1 ]
Wang, Derek D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Foreign Studies Univ, Sch Int Org, 19 Xisanhuan North Rd, Beijing 100089, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Univ Econ & Business, Sch Business Adm, 121 Zhangjialukou St, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Univ Econ & Business, China ESG Inst, 121 Zhangjialukou, Beijing 100070, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ESG; Sustainability reporting; Higher education institutions; China; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; UNIVERSITIES; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22527
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper investigates the ESG reporting practices of Chinese higher education institutions (HEIs). Based on Global Reporting Initiative's common reporting standards and the education sector-specific indicators proposed by earlier studies, we construct a disclosure framework of 112 indicators classified into environmental, social, governance, and educational dimensions. We manually collect all ESG-related information disclosed by 147 elite Chinese HEIs from various channels, including 8 standalone sustainability reports, around 600 annual reports, 139 charters, official websites, and official social media accounts, for the period 2020-2023. The results demonstrate how Chinese HEIs disclose different types of ESG information via different channels, with most of the information disclosed through channels other than standalone sustainability reports. Most Chinese HEIs do not adopt any specific disclosure standards but loosely follow the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in reporting. We further assess the quality of the disclosed information for each indicator and observe that, quality-wise, governance > educational > social > environmental, highlighting the necessity for Chinese HEIs to enhance environmental reporting. Next, we investigate the determinants of reporting quality and find that an HEI's number of faculty members is a more significant factor associated with its ESG reporting quality than other factors (i.e., number of students, funding, expenditure). Chinese HEIs are advised to report in a more balanced manner across the four dimensions in a standalone report using an education-oriented indicator-based framework instead of the current SDGs-based framework, to improve the completeness, materiality, and comparability of information.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [1] AASHE, 2023, The Sustainability Tracking, Assessment & Rating System
  • [2] Sustainability reporting on the websites of public and private universities in Ghana
    Amoako, Kwame Oduro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABILITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 24 (06) : 1220 - 1246
  • [3] Nonfinancial reporting regulation and challenges in sustainability disclosure and corporate governance practices
    Aureli, Selena
    Del Baldo, Mara
    Lombardi, Rosa
    Nappo, Fabio
    [J]. BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 29 (06) : 2392 - 2403
  • [4] Beijing University of Technology, 2016, Basic Information of Full-Time
  • [5] Burhan A.H. N., 2012, Journal of Economics, Business Accountancy Ventura, V15, P257, DOI DOI 10.14414/JEBAV.V15I2.79
  • [6] China University of Political Science and Law, 2020, 2019-2020 Information Disclosure Report
  • [7] Committee of Education of Shanghai, 2017, Notice on the Promotion of Law-Based Governance of Education Institutions of the Municipality
  • [8] Communication University of China, About IAN-CSF
  • [9] Diffusion Of sustainability reporting in universities: current situation and future perspectives
    del Mar Alonso-Almeida, Maria
    Marimon, Frederic
    Casani, Fernando
    Rodriguez-Pomeda, Jesus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 106 : 144 - 154
  • [10] Sustainability assessment of the service operations at seven higher education institutions in Brazil
    Drahein, Alfred Douglas
    De Lima, Edson Pinheiro
    Gouvea Da Costa, Sergio Eduardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 (527-536) : 527 - 536