An induced OWA aggregation operator with dual preference setting for DEA cross-efficiency ranking

被引:5
|
作者
Oukil, Amar [1 ]
Amin, Gholam R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sultan Qaboos Univ, Muscat, Oman
[2] Univ New Brunswick, St John, NB, Canada
关键词
Induced ordered weighted averaging (IOWA); Dual preference; Preference voting; Data envelopment analysis; Aggregation; Ranking; WEIGHTED AVERAGING AGGREGATION; DECISION-MAKING; IMPROVING DISCERNMENT; MINIMAX DISPARITY; MULTICRITERIA; MODELS; PRIORITIZATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-023-09235-0
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Cross-efficiency (CE) evaluation is an extension of the data envelopment analysis approach that allows decision making units (DMUs) to assess their peers by means of their own appreciation weights. As a result, each DMU is presented with a vector of CE scores, which need to undergo an aggregation operation to yield the ultimate ranking score. The aggregation is commonly carried out through an appropriate aggregation operator. In this paper, we propose an induced ordered weighted averaging (IOWA) operator with dual preference setting (2-IOWA) as a new aggregation device. The 2-IOWA aggregation novelty resides in its twined order inducing variables, which are defined by exploiting exclusively the appreciative properties of the CE matrix. The first-order inducing variable is the voting rank order that characterizes the preference voting system embedded within the CE matrix. The corresponding IOWA-level 1 aggregation produces a composite vote for each DMU by employing as arguments the individual votes assigned to it. The second-order inducing variable is represented by these composite votes, which are adopted to induce a common order on the rows of the CE matrix as a part of the IOWA-level 2 aggregation. The 2-IOWA aggregation process is conducted with OWA weights that are generated through different minimax disparity models by using different optimism level values in order to corroborate the influence of subjectivity on the structure of the ranking patterns besides evaluating the robustness of the proposed methodological framework.
引用
收藏
页码:18419 / 18440
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A new cross-efficiency ranking method in group decision making environment
    Wu, Meiqin
    Hou, Xiaoqing
    Fan, Jianping
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2021, 41 (02) : 3107 - 3119
  • [32] DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings
    Wu, Jie
    Liang, Liang
    Chen, Yao
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (04): : 909 - 918
  • [33] Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations: A metaheuristic approach
    Alcaraz, J.
    Monge, J. F.
    Ramon, N.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2022, 73 (04) : 779 - 793
  • [34] A DEA cross-efficiency approach based on bargaining theory
    Contreras, I.
    Lozano, S.
    Hinojosa, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2021, 72 (05) : 1156 - 1167
  • [35] DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement
    Wu, Jie
    Chu, Junfei
    Sun, Jiasen
    Zhu, Qingyuan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 248 (02) : 571 - 579
  • [36] PREFERENCE VOTING AND RANKING USING DEA GAME CROSS EFFICIENCY MODEL
    Wu, Jie
    Liang, Liang
    Zha, Yingchun
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONS RESEARCH SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2009, 52 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [37] Group decision making based on DEA cross-efficiency with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations
    Liu, Jinpei
    Song, Jingmiao
    Xu, Qin
    Tao, Zhifu
    Chen, Huayou
    FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 18 (03) : 345 - 370
  • [38] EFFICIENCY AND CROSS-EFFICIENCY IN DEA - DERIVATIONS, MEANINGS AND USES
    DOYLE, J
    GREEN, R
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1994, 45 (05) : 567 - 578
  • [40] Assessment of Iranian airlines using network cross-efficiency DEA and the regret theory
    Ganji, S. S.
    Mardani, Abbas
    Jahed, Rasul
    CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2024, 18