An induced OWA aggregation operator with dual preference setting for DEA cross-efficiency ranking

被引:5
|
作者
Oukil, Amar [1 ]
Amin, Gholam R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sultan Qaboos Univ, Muscat, Oman
[2] Univ New Brunswick, St John, NB, Canada
关键词
Induced ordered weighted averaging (IOWA); Dual preference; Preference voting; Data envelopment analysis; Aggregation; Ranking; WEIGHTED AVERAGING AGGREGATION; DECISION-MAKING; IMPROVING DISCERNMENT; MINIMAX DISPARITY; MULTICRITERIA; MODELS; PRIORITIZATION; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1007/s00500-023-09235-0
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Cross-efficiency (CE) evaluation is an extension of the data envelopment analysis approach that allows decision making units (DMUs) to assess their peers by means of their own appreciation weights. As a result, each DMU is presented with a vector of CE scores, which need to undergo an aggregation operation to yield the ultimate ranking score. The aggregation is commonly carried out through an appropriate aggregation operator. In this paper, we propose an induced ordered weighted averaging (IOWA) operator with dual preference setting (2-IOWA) as a new aggregation device. The 2-IOWA aggregation novelty resides in its twined order inducing variables, which are defined by exploiting exclusively the appreciative properties of the CE matrix. The first-order inducing variable is the voting rank order that characterizes the preference voting system embedded within the CE matrix. The corresponding IOWA-level 1 aggregation produces a composite vote for each DMU by employing as arguments the individual votes assigned to it. The second-order inducing variable is represented by these composite votes, which are adopted to induce a common order on the rows of the CE matrix as a part of the IOWA-level 2 aggregation. The 2-IOWA aggregation process is conducted with OWA weights that are generated through different minimax disparity models by using different optimism level values in order to corroborate the influence of subjectivity on the structure of the ranking patterns besides evaluating the robustness of the proposed methodological framework.
引用
收藏
页码:18419 / 18440
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cross-efficiency in DEA: A maximum resonated appreciative model
    Oral, Muhittin
    Amin, Gholam R.
    Oukil, Amar
    MEASUREMENT, 2015, 63 : 159 - 167
  • [22] Cross-Efficiency aggregation based on the denominator rule
    Karagiannis, Giannis
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 238
  • [24] In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA
    Lam, K. F.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2010, 61 (01) : 134 - 143
  • [25] Cross-efficiency aggregation in DEA models using the evidential-reasoning approach
    Yang, Guo-liang
    Yang, Jian-bo
    Liu, Wen-bin
    Li, Xiao-xuan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2013, 231 (02) : 393 - 404
  • [26] Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation
    Wang, Ying-Ming
    Chin, Kwai-Sang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2010, 128 (01) : 332 - 338
  • [27] A ranking method for DMUs with interval data based on dea cross-efficiency evaluation and TOPSIS
    Wu, Jie
    Sun, Jiasen
    Song, Malin
    Liang, Liang
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2013, 22 (02) : 191 - 201
  • [28] Embracing fairness within a cross-efficiency hierarchical network DEA system
    Xiao, Siwei
    Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos
    Kyrgiakos, Leonidas Sotirios
    Vlontzos, George
    Pardalos, Panos M.
    OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [29] DEA Cross-Efficiency Aggregation with Deviation Degree Based on Standardized Euclidean Distance
    Zou, Yan
    Chen, Weijie
    Tong, Mingyu
    Tao, Shuo
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 2021
  • [30] Improving DEA cross-efficiency optimization in portfolio selection
    Amin, Gholam R.
    Hajjami, Mohaddeseh
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2021, 168 (168)