Energy efficiency evaluation, technology gap ratio, and determinants of energy productivity change in developed and developing G20 economies: DEA super-SBM and MLI approaches

被引:42
作者
Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan [1 ]
Zhu, Nan [2 ]
Hao, Gang [3 ]
Yan, Hong [1 ]
Yasmeen, Rizwana [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Shuren Univ, Sch Management, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
[2] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Western Business Sch, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Management Sci, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Panzhihua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Panzhihua 617000, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Relig & Denominat, Dept Econ, Pardisan 37100, Iran
关键词
Energy efficiency; G20; Production technology gaps; Super SBM-DEA; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gr.2023.07.017
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study employed Slack-based measure (SBM), Meta-frontier analysis, and Malmquist-Luenberger index (MLI) approaches to measure energy efficiency (EE), production technology heterogeneity, and energy productivity variation and its main determinants in developed and developing G20 countries for the period 1995-2020. The study's findings are: (i) Average EE for G20 countries is 0.8577, but still has an improvement potential of 14.23 percent. (ii) Developed countries have a higher average EE than developing (0.8927 > 0.8290). Results further revealed that energy efficiency scores in Argentina, Australia, Brazil, France, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, the US, the UK, and Korea are>1. (iii) Technology gap ratio (TGR) value in developed countries is higher than in developing (0.9869 > 0.6801), indicating that developed countries have advanced energy technologies superiority. The average MLI is less than one, showing a decline in energy productivity mainly due to a decline in technical efficiency, as EC < TC. (iv) Developed G20 countries get 0.64 percent aggregate growth in energy productivity as their MLI score is 1.0064, mainly due to technological growth (TC = 1.0161). Developing G20 countries, on the other hand, witnessed a decline in their energy productivity during 1995-2020, as MLI = 0.9925 > 1, designating that, on average, there is a 0.75 % decline in MLI.(c) 2023 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 81
页数:12
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Ahmad R.D.R., 2021, Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences
[2]   Ports' technical and operational measures to reduce greenhouse gas emission and improve energy efficiency: A review [J].
Alamoush, Anas S. ;
Ballini, Fabio ;
Olcer, Aykut, I .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2020, 160
[3]   Analyzing the determinants of carbon emissions from transportation in European countries: the role of renewable energy and urbanization [J].
Amin, Azka ;
Altinoz, Buket ;
Dogan, Eyup .
CLEAN TECHNOLOGIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2020, 22 (08) :1725-1734
[4]   Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: which is the preferred method? [J].
Ang, BW .
ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (09) :1131-1139
[5]  
Bargaoui S.A., 2020, Journal of the International Academy for Case Studies
[6]   The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: A revisited Environmental Kuznets Curve approach [J].
Bilgili, Faik ;
Kocak, Emrah ;
Bulut, Umit .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 :838-845
[7]   Energy efficiency in general equilibrium with input-output linkages [J].
Blackburn, Christopher J. ;
Moreno-Cruz, Juan .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 110
[8]   Variable-selection ANOVA Simultaneous Component Analysis (VASCA) [J].
Camacho, Jose ;
Vitale, Raffaele ;
Morales-Jimenez, David ;
Gomez-Llorente, Carolina .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2023, 39 (01)
[9]   Does energy efficiency improve technological change and economic growth in developing countries? [J].
Cantore, Nicola ;
Cali, Massimiliano ;
te Velde, Dirk Willem .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 92 :279-285
[10]   An application of total-factor energy efficiency under the metafrontier framework [J].
Chang, Ming-Chung .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 142