Influence of key factors on ammonia and nitrous oxide emission factors for excreta deposited by livestock and land-applied manure

被引:9
|
作者
van der Weerden, T. J. [1 ]
Noble, A. N. [2 ]
Beltran, I. [3 ]
Hutchings, N. J. [4 ]
Thorman, R. E. [5 ]
de Klein, C. A. M. [1 ]
Amon, B. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] AgResearch Ltd, Invermay Agr Ctr, Mosgiel 9053, New Zealand
[2] AgResearch Ltd, Lincoln Res Ctr, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
[3] Inst Invest Agr INIA, INIA Remehue, Carretera Panamer Sur Km 8 Norte, Osorno, Chile
[4] Aarhus Univ, Res Ctr Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
[5] Agr Dev & Advisory Serv, ADAS Boxworth, Battlegate Rd, Cambridge CB23 4NN, England
[6] Leibniz Inst Agrartechn & Biookon ATB, Max Eyth Allee 100, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
[7] Univ Zielona Gora, Fac Civil Engn Architecture & Environm Engn, Zielona Gora, Poland
关键词
Slurry; Urine; Dung; Cattle; Swine; Sheep; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; FIELD-APPLIED MANURE; N2O EMISSIONS; CATTLE SLURRY; SOIL-PH; DENITRIFICATION; FERTILIZER; URINE; ACIDIFICATION; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164066
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Ammonia (NH3) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from livestock manure management have a significant impact on air quality and climate change. There is an increasing urgency to improve our understanding of drivers influencing these emissions. We analysed the DATAMAN ("DATAbase for MANaging greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions factors") database to identify key factors influencing (i) NH3 emission factors (EFs) for cattle and swine manure applied to land and (ii) N2O EFs for cattle and swine manure applied to land, and (iii) cattle urine, dung and sheep urine deposited during grazing. Slurry dry matter (DM) content, total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN) concentration and method of application were significant drivers of NH3 EFs from cattle and swine slurry. Mixed effect models explained 14-59 % of the variance in NH3 EFs. Apart from the method of application, the significant influence of manure DM, manure TAN concentration or pH on NH3 EFs suggests mitigation strategies should focus on these. Identifying key factors influencing N2O EFs from manures and livestock grazing was more challenging, likely because of the complexities associated with microbial processes and soil physical properties impacting N2O production and emissions. Generally, significant factors were soil-related e.g. soil water content, pH, clay content, suggesting mitigations may need to consider the conditions of the receiving environment for manure spreading and grazing deposition. Total variability explained by terms in mixed effect model was on average 66 %, with the random effect 'experiment identification number' explaining, on average, 41 % of the total variability in the models. We suspect this term captured the effect of non-measured manure, soil and climate factors and any biases in application and measurement technique effects associated with individual experiments. This analysis has helped to improve our understanding of key factors of NH3 and N2O EFs for inclusion within models. With more studies over time, insights into the underlying processes influencing emissions will be fur-ther improved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Simulation and Influence Factors of Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Gases Emission under Different Straw Retention Depths
    Chen, Can
    Bao, Yun-xuan
    Lv, Qing
    Tang, Qian
    Nu, Kai
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 146 (03)
  • [23] Apparent Nitrogen Recovery in Milk and Early Dry Season Nitrous Oxide Emission Factors for Urine Deposited by Dual-Purpose Cattle on Different Soil Types
    Durango Morales, Sandra Guisela
    Barahona, Rolando
    Bolivar, Diana M.
    Arango, Jacobo
    Verchot, Louis
    Chirinda, Ngonidzashe
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2021, 4
  • [24] EMISSION FACTORS FOR LIGHT-DUTY VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH THREE-WAY CATALYTIC CONVERTER BASED ON MICRO-REACTOR STUDIES: A PROPOSAL FOR AMMONIA, NITROUS OXIDE AND MOLECULAR HYDROGEN
    Ariel Fuentes, Gustavo
    Schifter, Isaac
    Castillo, Salvador
    Arcelia Garcia-Serrano, Luz
    Mejia-Centeno, Isidro
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 18 (02): : 275 - 282