The Impact of Intellectual Property Rights City Policy on Firm Green Innovation: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on a Staggered DID Model

被引:13
作者
Xia, Xingneng [1 ]
Huang, Tao [1 ]
Zhang, Sheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Adm, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
来源
SYSTEMS | 2023年 / 11卷 / 04期
关键词
DID model; green innovation; IPR; city policy; EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.3390/systems11040209
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Green innovation is considered an important way to promote low-carbon society formation and the sustainable development of environmental engineering. However, few quantitative studies have focused on the impact of intellectual property rights (IPR) on firm green innovation (FGI). This paper constructs a quasi-natural experiment based on the IPR pilot city policy in China. We empirically investigated the influence of IPR policy on FGI using a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) model and Chinese listed company data from 2007 to 2020. The findings of this research are as follows: (1) IPR policy significantly promotes FGI, and its effectiveness is confirmed by a variety of robustness tests. (2) The IPR policy supports both green product and green process innovation, with a stronger effect on green product innovation. (3) The IPR policy encourages green independent R&D but has little influence on green joint R&D. (4) The IPR policy promotes FGI with a high knowledge intensity, state-owned enterprises, and firms in key city groups. (5) The IPR policy supports FGI primarily via two institutional channels: increasing R&D investment and easing financing constraints. This paper broadens the study of green innovation city policy and FGI development, offering new perspectives for achieving social and environmental sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges [J].
Appio, Francesco Paolo ;
Lima, Marcos ;
Paroutis, Sotirios .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 142 :1-14
[2]   Big Bad Banks? The Winners and Losers from Bank Deregulation in the United States [J].
Beck, Thorsten ;
Levine, Ross ;
Levkov, Alexey .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2010, 65 (05) :1637-1667
[3]   Smart innovative cities: The impact of Smart City policies on urban innovation [J].
Caragliu, Andrea ;
Del Bo, Chiara F. .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 142 :373-383
[4]  
Chu J.M.W.W., 2012, WASH LEE J ENERGY CL, V4, P53
[5]   A smart city is a less polluted city [J].
Chu, Zhen ;
Cheng, Mingwang ;
Yu, Ning Neil .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 172
[6]  
CNIPA, NAT INT PROP PIL DEM
[7]   Shaping sustainable development: External environmental pressure, exploratory green learning, and radical green innovation [J].
Cui, Rixiao ;
Wang, Juanru .
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 29 (03) :481-495
[8]   Intellectual property rights protection and export product quality: Evidence from China [J].
Dong, Baomin ;
Guo, Yibei ;
Hu, Xiaotian .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 77 :143-158
[9]   Sustainability transitions in manufacturing: the role of intellectual property [J].
Eppinger, Elisabeth ;
Jain, Akriti ;
Vimalnath, Pratheeba ;
Gurtoo, Anjula ;
Tietze, Frank ;
Chea, Roberto Hernandez .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 49 :118-126
[10]   Financial constraints and the failure of innovation projects [J].
Garcia-Quevedo, Jose ;
Segarra-Blasco, Agusti ;
Teruel, Mercedes .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 127 :127-140