Active disturbance rejection control of pressurized water reactor

被引:11
作者
Ahmad, Saif [1 ]
Abdulraheem, Kamal Kayode [2 ,3 ]
Tolokonsky, Andrei Olegovich [2 ]
Ahmed, Hafiz [4 ]
机构
[1] ENSEEIHT, Lab Plasma & Convers Energie LAPLACE, F-31071 Toulouse, France
[2] Natl Nucl Res Univ, Moscow Engn Phys Inst, Automation Dept, Moscow, Russia
[3] Nigeria Atom Energy Commiss, Abuja, Nigeria
[4] Bangor Univ, Nucl Futures Inst, Bangor LL57 1UT, Wales
关键词
Pressurized water reactor; Active disturbance rejection control; Extended state observer; Measurement noise; MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL; EXTENDED-STATE-OBSERVER; DESIGN; MULTIMODEL; TRACKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2023.109845
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Control design for pressurized water reactor (PWR) is difficult due to associated non-linearity, modelling uncertainties and time-varying system parameters. Extended state observer (ESO) based active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) presents a simple and robust solution which is almost model free and has few tuning parameters. However, conventional ESO suffers from noise over-amplification in the obtained estimates due to high-gain construction which in turn degrades the noise sensitivity of the closed-loop system and limits the achievable dynamic performance in practical scenarios. To overcome this problem, two recent techniques namely cascade ESO (CESO) and low-power higher-order ESO (LHESO) are implemented for control of PWR. Simulation analysis is conducted in MATLAB to illustrate the performance improvement obtained over conventional ESO based ADRC, particularly in case of time-varying disturbances. Extensive simulation analysis is also conducted to investigate robustness towards parametric uncertainties. The study also presents a comparison of conventional ESO, CESO and LHESO to highlight their advantages as well as limitations which in turn would help the users in selecting the appropriate scheme for their particular use-case.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[31]   Load-following control of nuclear reactors based on fuzzy input-output model [J].
Luan, Xiuchun ;
Wang, Junling ;
Yang, Zhida ;
Zhou, Jie .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 151
[32]   State Feedback Output Tracking Model Reference Adaptive Control for Nuclear Reactor [J].
Reddy, Peddireddy M. S. ;
Shimjith, S. R. ;
Tiwari, A. P. ;
Kar, Soumitra .
IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (01) :319-324
[33]   Space-time kinetics modeling of Advanced Heavy Water Reactor for control studies [J].
Shimjith, S. R. ;
Tiwari, A. P. ;
Naskar, M. ;
Bandyopadhyay, B. .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2010, 37 (03) :310-324
[34]  
Sira-Ramirez Hebertt, 2018, Control Theory and Technology, V16, P249, DOI [10.1007/s11768-018-8134-x, 10.1007/s11768-018-8134-x]
[35]   Application of model free active disturbance rejection controller in nuclear reactor power control [J].
Sun, Aodi ;
Pu Songmao ;
He, Zhengxi ;
Xiao, Kai ;
Sun, Peiwei ;
Wang, Pengfei ;
Wei, Xinyu .
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 140
[36]   Second order integral sliding mode observer and controller for a nuclear reactor [J].
Surjagade, Piyush, V ;
Shimjith, S. R. ;
Tiwari, A. P. .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 52 (03) :552-559
[37]   LQGI/LTR based robust control technique for a pressurized water nuclear power plant [J].
Vajpayee, Vineet ;
Becerra, Victor ;
Bausch, Nils ;
Deng, Jiamei ;
Shimjith, S. R. ;
Arul, A. John .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 154 (154)
[38]   LQG/LTR Controller Design Based on Improved SFACC for the PWR Reactor Power Control System [J].
Wan, Jiashuang ;
Wang, Pengfei .
NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 194 (06) :433-446
[39]   Design of a model predictive control method for load tracking in nuclear power plants [J].
Wang, Guoxu ;
Wu, Jie ;
Zeng, Bifan ;
Xu, Zhibin ;
Wu, Wanqiang ;
Ma, Xiaoqian .
PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2017, 101 :260-269
[40]   Power distribution control of CANDU reactors based on modal representation of reactor kinetics [J].
Xia, Lingzhi ;
Jiang, Jin ;
Luxat, John C. .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2014, 278 :323-332