Active disturbance rejection control of pressurized water reactor

被引:11
作者
Ahmad, Saif [1 ]
Abdulraheem, Kamal Kayode [2 ,3 ]
Tolokonsky, Andrei Olegovich [2 ]
Ahmed, Hafiz [4 ]
机构
[1] ENSEEIHT, Lab Plasma & Convers Energie LAPLACE, F-31071 Toulouse, France
[2] Natl Nucl Res Univ, Moscow Engn Phys Inst, Automation Dept, Moscow, Russia
[3] Nigeria Atom Energy Commiss, Abuja, Nigeria
[4] Bangor Univ, Nucl Futures Inst, Bangor LL57 1UT, Wales
关键词
Pressurized water reactor; Active disturbance rejection control; Extended state observer; Measurement noise; MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL; EXTENDED-STATE-OBSERVER; DESIGN; MULTIMODEL; TRACKING;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2023.109845
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Control design for pressurized water reactor (PWR) is difficult due to associated non-linearity, modelling uncertainties and time-varying system parameters. Extended state observer (ESO) based active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) presents a simple and robust solution which is almost model free and has few tuning parameters. However, conventional ESO suffers from noise over-amplification in the obtained estimates due to high-gain construction which in turn degrades the noise sensitivity of the closed-loop system and limits the achievable dynamic performance in practical scenarios. To overcome this problem, two recent techniques namely cascade ESO (CESO) and low-power higher-order ESO (LHESO) are implemented for control of PWR. Simulation analysis is conducted in MATLAB to illustrate the performance improvement obtained over conventional ESO based ADRC, particularly in case of time-varying disturbances. Extensive simulation analysis is also conducted to investigate robustness towards parametric uncertainties. The study also presents a comparison of conventional ESO, CESO and LHESO to highlight their advantages as well as limitations which in turn would help the users in selecting the appropriate scheme for their particular use-case.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Adaptive second-order sliding-mode control for a pressurized water nuclear reactor in load following operation with Xenon oscillation suppression [J].
Abdulraheem, Kamal Kayode ;
Tolokonsky, Andrei Olegovich ;
Laidani, Zaher .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2022, 391
[2]   Robust optimal-integral sliding mode control for a pressurized water nuclear reactor in load following mode of operation [J].
Abdulraheem, Kamal Kayode ;
Korolev, Sergei Andreevich .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 158
[3]   A differentiator based second-order sliding-mode control of a pressurized water nuclear research reactor considering Xenon concentration feedback [J].
Abdulraheem, Kamal Kayode ;
Korolev, Sergei Andreevich ;
Laidani, Zaher .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2021, 156
[4]  
Ahmad Saif, 2023, 2023 IEEE Texas Power and Energy Conference (TPEC), P1, DOI 10.1109/TPEC56611.2023.10078484
[5]   Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Nuclear Pressurized Water Reactor for Power Generation [J].
Ahmad, Saif ;
Abdulraheem, Kamal Kayode ;
Tolokonsky, Andrei Olegovich ;
Ahmed, Hafiz .
2022 IEEE 4TH GLOBAL POWER, ENERGY AND COMMUNICATION CONFERENCE (IEEE GPECOM2022), 2022, :372-377
[6]   Robust Intrusion Detection for Resilience Enhancement of Industrial Control Systems: An Extended State Observer Approach [J].
Ahmad, Saif ;
Ahmed, Hafiz .
2022 IEEE TEXAS POWER AND ENERGY CONFERENCE (TPEC), 2021, :19-24
[7]   On Active Disturbance Rejection Control in Presence of Measurement Noise [J].
Ahmad, Saif ;
Ali, Ahmad .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2022, 69 (11) :11600-11610
[8]   Unified Disturbance-Estimation-Based Control and Equivalence With IMC and PID: Case Study on a DC-DC Boost Converter [J].
Ahmad, Saif ;
Ali, Ahmad .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2021, 68 (06) :5122-5132
[9]  
Ahmad S, 2019, 2019 SIXTH INDIAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ICC), P496, DOI [10.1109/ICC47138.2019.9123202, 10.1109/icc47138.2019.9123202]
[10]   Active disturbance rejection control of DC-DC boost converter: a review with modifications for improved performance [J].
Ahmad, Saif ;
Ali, Ahmad .
IET POWER ELECTRONICS, 2019, 12 (08) :2095-2107