Ten competencies for the science misinformation crisis

被引:25
|
作者
Allchin, Douglas [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Minnesota Ctr Philosophy Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
consensus; credibility; disinformation; epistemic dependence; expertise; gatekeeping; misinformation; science education; SCIENTIFIC EXPERTISE; TRUST; CLASSROOM; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1002/sce.21746
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Scientific misinformation and disinformation, proliferating via the internet and social media, are now significant problems. Proposed solutions vary substantially. Here, I describe a set of prospective benchmarks-10 competencies-that seem essential for reorienting science education to address the challenge. They include, first, elements of epistemic motivation, including basic epistemological beliefs about "constructed" knowledge, adopting a posture of respect for empirical evidence, and an understanding of our epistemic dependence on experts. Second, the benchmarks include perspectives and skills in interacting with media sources. These include how to identify experts, how to identify credible gatekeepers, how to recognize deceptive strategies, and how to deal with social networks and technology. Finally, the competencies include self-regulation, such as acknowledging the cognitive dispositions that bias our thinking (especially about information that challenges our pre-existing beliefs) and the counter-balancing role of consensus. I hope that these competency goals can function as a concrete target in guiding discussion of perhaps more complete or more nuanced approaches to the current crisis. With such competencies clearly and explicitly articulated, teachers will be better positioned to develop effective classroom strategies to nurture the relevant competencies.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 274
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Reducing Health Misinformation in Science: A Call to Arms
    Swire-Thompson, Briony
    Lazer, David
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2022, 700 (01) : 124 - 135
  • [22] Combatting Misinformation through Science Communication Training
    Osterhage, Jennifer L.
    Rogers-Carpenter, Katherine
    AMERICAN BIOLOGY TEACHER, 2022, 84 (07) : 390 - 395
  • [23] Building Public Support for Science Spending: Misinformation, Motivated Reasoning, and the Power of Corrections
    Goldfarb, Jillian L.
    Kriner, Douglas L.
    SCIENCE COMMUNICATION, 2017, 39 (01) : 77 - 100
  • [24] Connected Through Crisis: Emotional Proximity and the Spread of Misinformation Online
    Huang, Y. Linlin
    Starbird, Kate
    Orand, Mania
    Stanek, Stephanie A.
    Pedersen, Heather T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2015 ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK AND SOCIAL COMPUTING (CSCW'15), 2015, : 969 - 980
  • [25] Agricultural GMOs and their associated pesticides: misinformation, science, and evidence
    Michael N. Antoniou
    Claire Robinson
    Irina Castro
    Angelika Hilbeck
    Environmental Sciences Europe, 35
  • [26] Agricultural GMOs and their associated pesticides: misinformation, science, and evidence
    Antoniou, Michael N.
    Robinson, Claire
    Castro, Irina
    Hilbeck, Angelika
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES EUROPE, 2023, 35 (01)
  • [27] Beyond the boundaries of science: Resistance to misinformation by scientist citizens
    Russell, Adrienne
    Tegelber, Matthew
    JOURNALISM, 2020, 21 (03) : 327 - 344
  • [28] Misinformation and Disinformation in Food Science and Nutrition: Impact on Practice
    Diekman, Connie
    Ryan, Camille D.
    Oliver, Tracy L.
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2023, 153 (01) : 3 - 9
  • [29] Misinformation or hard to tell? An eye-tracking study to investigate the effects of food crisis misinformation on social media engagement
    Lee, Yen-I.
    Mu, Di
    Hsu, Ying-Chia
    Wojdynski, Bartosz W.
    Binford, Matt
    PUBLIC RELATIONS REVIEW, 2024, 50 (04)
  • [30] Equity in teaching science during times of crisis: a study with Portuguese science teachers
    Baptista, Monica
    Costa, Estela
    Martins, Iva
    CULTURAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2023, 18 (03) : 631 - 646