Recruitment strategies and interventions to increase participation in lung cancer screening programmes: a systematic review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Djuric, Olivera [1 ,2 ]
Venturelli, Francesco [1 ]
Bassi, Maria Chiara [3 ]
Gorini, Giuseppe [4 ]
Paci, Eugenio [5 ]
Mantellini, Paola [6 ]
Rossi, Paolo Giorgi [1 ]
机构
[1] Azienda Unita Sanit Locale IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Epidemiol Unit, Reggio Emilia, Italy
[2] Univ Modena & Reggio Emilia, Ctr Environm Nutr & Genet Epidemiol CREAGEN, Dept Biomed Metab & Neural Sci, Publ Hlth Unit, Reggio Emilia, Italy
[3] Azienda Unita Sanit Locale IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Sci Lib, Reggio Emilia, Italy
[4] Inst Study Prevent & Network Oncol ISPRO, Div Epidemiol & Clin Governance, Florence, Italy
[5] Italian League Canc LILT, Florence, Italy
[6] Inst Study Prevent & Network Oncol ISPRO, Div Screening, Florence, Italy
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
Epidemiology; Respiratory tract tumours; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074140
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionDespite strong evidence for the efficacy of low-radiation dose CT (LDCT) in reducing lung cancer (LC) mortality, implementing LC screening (LCS) programmes remains a challenge. We aim to systematically review the evidence on the strategies used to recruit the adult population at risk of LC to LDCT within LCS programmes and to estimate the effectiveness of interventions identified, used to reach the potentially eligible population, increase participation and informed choice, and ensure equitable access.Methods and analysisThis sequential systematic literature review will consist of three steps: (1) a scoping review of existing strategies and organisational models for LCS; (2) selecting papers reporting relevant outcomes (test coverage, screening participation and informed choice) and comparing results among different models; (3) a systematic review of interventions implemented to increase participation in LCS programmes. Each step will follow the methodological guidelines provided by the Cochrane Collaboration and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Data sources include electronic databases such as Medline (PubMed version), Embase, CINAHL (Ebsco version), Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL. The search will be limited to studies published from January 2000 to March 2023 in English, Italian, French, Spanish, Serbian and Croatian language. Findings will be synthesised quantitatively and qualitatively as appropriate. Risk of bias assessment will be only applied to studies selected in the second and third steps. The quality of evidence will be summarised for each outcome using the Grading Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology.Ethics and disseminationGiven that this is a review of existing literature, ethics approval is not required. The results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at relevant conferences. The findings of this review will help guide health authorities in organising LCS programmes and developing recommendations, policies, and actions at national and regional levels.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023408357.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?
    Flander, Louisa
    Dekker, Evelien
    Andersen, Berit
    Larsen, Mette Bach
    Steele, Robert J.
    Malila, Nea
    Sarkeala, Tytti
    van der Vlugt, Manon
    de Klerk, Clasine
    Knottnerus, Bart
    Bertels, Lucinda
    Woudstra, Anke
    Spaander, Manon C. W.
    Fransen, Mirjam
    Heinavaara, Sirpa
    Dillon, Mary
    Ouakrim, Driss Ait
    Jenkins, Mark
    CANCER CONTROL, 2022, 29
  • [42] What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?
    Flander, Louisa
    Dekker, Evelien
    Andersen, Berit
    Larsen, Mette Bach
    Steele, Robert J.
    Malila, Nea
    Sarkeala, Tytti
    van der Vlugt, Manon
    de Klerk, Clasine
    Knottnerus, Bart
    Bertels, Lucinda
    Woudstra, Anke
    Spaander, Manon C. W.
    Fransen, Mirjam
    Heinavaara, Sirpa
    Dillon, Mary
    Ouakrim, Driss Ait
    Jenkins, Mark
    CANCER CONTROL, 2022, 29
  • [43] Interventions to increase access to or uptake of physical health screening in people with severe mental illness: a realist review
    Lamontagne-Godwin, Frederique
    Burgess, Caroline
    Clement, Sarah
    Gasston-Hales, Melanie
    Greene, Carolynn
    Manyande, Anne
    Taylor, Deborah
    Walters, Paul
    Barley, Elizabeth
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (02):
  • [44] What can We Learn From High-Performing Screening Programs to Increase Bowel Cancer Screening Participation in Australia?
    Flander, Louisa
    Dekker, Evelien
    Andersen, Berit
    Larsen, Mette Bach
    Steele, Robert J.
    Malila, Nea
    Sarkeala, Tytti
    van der Vlugt, Manon
    de Klerk, Clasine
    Knottnerus, Bart
    Bertels, Lucinda
    Woudstra, Anke
    Spaander, Manon C. W.
    Fransen, Mirjam
    Heinavaara, Sirpa
    Dillon, Mary
    Ouakrim, Driss Ait
    Jenkins, Mark
    CANCER CONTROL, 2022, 29
  • [45] Mapping global evidence on strategies and interventions in neurotrauma and road traffic collisions prevention: a scoping review protocol
    Selveindran, Santhani M.
    Khan, Muhammad Mukhtar
    Simadibrata, Daniel Martin
    Hutchinson, Peter J. A.
    Brayne, Carol
    Hill, Christine
    Kolias, Angelos
    Joannides, Alexis J.
    Servadei, Franco
    Rubiano, Andres M.
    Shabani, Hamisi K.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [46] Scoping review protocol: is there a role for physical activity interventions in the treatment pathway of bladder cancer?
    Mehrotra, Sneha
    Rowland, Megan
    Zhang, Hanyu
    Russell, Beth
    Fox, Louis
    Beyer, Katharina
    Rammant, Elke
    Peat, Nicola
    Van Hemelrijck, Mieke
    Bosco, Cecilia
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (11):
  • [47] Evaluation of the association between extravascular lung water and prognosis of sepsis A protocol of systematic review
    Luo, Peng
    Song, Cai-xia
    Ai, Ye-ping
    Chen, Zhe
    Yan, Sheng-nan
    Liu, Xia
    Chen, Ying
    Sun, Jia-bin
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (05) : E23971
  • [48] Do social protection programmes have a causal effect on suicide mortality? A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kim, Chungah
    Azra, Karanpreet
    Teo, Celine
    Nielsen, Andrew
    Bellows, Zachary
    Young, Thomas
    Chum, Antony
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (04):
  • [49] Government policy interventions to reduce human antimicrobial use: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Van Katwyk, Susan Rogers
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Mendelson, Marc
    Taljaard, Monica
    Hoffman, Steven J.
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [50] Impact of health literacy and its interventions on health outcomes in those with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review protocol
    Lathlean, Timothy
    Kieu, Don
    Franke, Kyle B.
    O'Callaghan, Nathan
    Boyd, Mark A.
    Mahajan, Rajiv
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (12):