Exposure to international trade lowers green voting and worsens environmental attitudes

被引:5
作者
Bez, Charlotte [1 ,2 ]
Bosetti, Valentina [3 ,4 ]
Colantone, Italo [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Zanardi, Maurizio [8 ]
机构
[1] Scuola Super Sant Anna, Pisa, Italy
[2] Potsdam Inst Climate Impact Res, Potsdam, Germany
[3] Bocconi Univ, Milan, Italy
[4] Euro Mediterranean Ctr Climate Change, RFF CMCC European Inst Econ & Environm, Lecce, Italy
[5] Baffi Carefin Res Ctr, Milan, Italy
[6] CESifo, Munich, Germany
[7] FEEM, Milan, Italy
[8] Univ Surrey, Guildford, England
关键词
IMPORT COMPETITION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POLARIZATION; MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1038/s41558-023-01789-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
From a political perspective, advancing green agendas in democracies requires obtaining electoral support for parties and candidates proposing green platforms. It is therefore crucial to understand the factors driving green voting and attitudes. Yet, limited research has explored the role of economic determinants in this context. In this study we show that globalization, through the distributional consequences of import competition, is an important determinant of support for parties proposing green platforms. Our analysis covers the United States and 15 countries of Western Europe, over the period 2000-2019, with trade exposure measured at the level of subnational geographic areas. We find that higher trade exposure leads to lower support for more environmentalist parties and to more sceptical attitudes about climate change. Our empirical findings are in line with the theoretical channel of deprioritization of environmental concerns, as trade-induced economic distress raises the salience of economic issues. Climate policy requires proenvironment attitudes and voting by the public in democracies, yet economic conditions can impact such perceptions and behaviour. Higher exposure to globalization can lead to lower support for environmentalist parties and more climate scepticism.
引用
收藏
页码:1131 / 1135
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[21]  
Kollman Ken., 2016, CONSTITUENCY LEVEL E
[22]   THE POLITICIZATION OF CLIMATE CHANGE AND POLARIZATION IN THE AMERICAN PUBLIC'S VIEWS OF GLOBAL WARMING, 2001-2010 [J].
McCright, Aaron M. ;
Dunlap, Riley E. .
SOCIOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2011, 52 (02) :155-194
[23]  
Volkens Andrea., 2018, Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR), DOI DOI 10.25522/MANIFESTO.MPDS.2018A
[24]   Job losses and political acceptability of climate policies: why the 'job-killing' argument is so persistent and how to overturn it [J].
Vona, Francesco .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2019, 19 (04) :524-532
[25]   Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet) [J].
Weber, Elke U. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2006, 77 (1-2) :103-120