The Major Depression Inventory for diagnosing according to DSM-5 and ICD-11: Psychometric properties and validity in a Swedish general population

被引:3
作者
Lundin, Andreas [1 ]
Moller, Jette [1 ]
Forsell, Yvonne [1 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Global Publ Hlth, Stockholm, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
diagnostic test accuracy; DSM-IV; ICD-10; MDI; sensitivity and specificity; CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT; HOPELESSNESS; SEVERITY; SPECIFICITY; PREVALENCE; DISORDERS; SCHEDULES; INDEX;
D O I
10.1002/mpr.1966
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objectives: The Major Depression Inventory (MDI) was constructed to assess DSM-IV and ICD-10 depression symptoms, and does not fully cover the symptoms listed in DSM-5 and ICD-11. This study aimed to augment the MDI to the new diagnostic standards by adding a new item, and to assess and compare the measurement performance of the MDI items and diagnostic algorithms for major depression according to DSM-IV, ICD-10, DSM-5 and ICD-11.Methods: Surveys collected 2001-2003 and 2021, including self-assessed MDI were used. A new hopelessness item was constructed and analyzed alongside the hopelessness item in the Symptom Checklist. The performance of items was compared using Rasch and Mokken analyses. Criterion validity was examined using equivalent diagnoses from psychiatric interview (Schedules for Clinical Assessments in Neuropsychiatry [SCAN]) as standard.ResultsMDI information was provided by 8511 individuals in 2001-2003 (SCAN subsample n = 878), and 8863 in 2021. All items, including hopelessness had good psychometric properties. Sensitivity ranged between 56% and 70%, and specificity between 95% and 96%, indicating similar criterion validity.Conclusions: Hopelessness and the MDI items had good psychometrics. MDI for DSM-5 and ICD-11 had similar validity as for DSM-IV and ICD-10. We recommend that MDI is updated to DSM-5 and ICD-11 by adding a hopelessness item.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] American Psychiatric Association, 1980, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
  • [2] Increasing prevalence of depression from 2000 to 2006
    Andersen, Ingelise
    Thielen, Karsten
    Bech, Per
    Nygaard, Else
    Diderichsen, Finn
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2011, 39 (08) : 857 - 863
  • [3] The WHO (Ten) well-being index: Validation in diabetes
    Bech, P
    Gudex, C
    Johansen, KS
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1996, 65 (04) : 183 - 190
  • [4] The sensitivity and specificity of the Major Depression Inventory, using the Present State Examination as the index of diagnostic validity
    Bech, P
    Rasmussen, NA
    Olsen, LR
    Noerholm, V
    Abildgaard, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2001, 66 (2-3) : 159 - 164
  • [5] The Performance of the Revised Major Depression Inventory for Self-Reported Severity of Depression - Implications for the DSM-5 and ICD-11
    Bech, Per
    Christensen, Ellen Margrethe
    Vinberg, Maj
    Ostergaard, Soren Dinesen
    Martiny, Klaus
    Kessing, Lars Vedel
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2013, 82 (03) : 187 - 188
  • [6] LEVELS OF HOPELESSNESS IN DSM-III DISORDERS - A PARTIAL TEST OF CONTENT SPECIFICITY IN DEPRESSION
    BECK, AT
    RISKIND, JH
    BROWN, G
    STEER, RA
    [J]. COGNITIVE THERAPY AND RESEARCH, 1988, 12 (05) : 459 - 469
  • [7] AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION
    BECK, AT
    ERBAUGH, J
    WARD, CH
    MOCK, J
    MENDELSOHN, M
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) : 561 - &
  • [8] HOPELESSNESS AND SUICIDAL-BEHAVIOR - OVERVIEW
    BECK, AT
    KOVACS, M
    WEISSMAN, A
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1975, 234 (11): : 1146 - 1149
  • [9] CCMH, 2022, MDI SCOR INSTR
  • [10] The association between depression and mortality - a comparison of survey- and register-based measures of depression
    Christensen, Gunhild Tidemann
    Martensson, Solvej
    Osler, Merete
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2017, 210 : 111 - 114