Propofol decreased the etomidate-induced myoclonus in adult patients: a meta-analysis and systematic review

被引:1
|
作者
Feng, Y. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Chen, X. -B. [4 ]
Zhang, Y. -L. [5 ]
Chang, P. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhang, W. -S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Translat Neurosci Ctr, Lab Anesthesia & Crit Care Med, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Res Units West China 2018RU12, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, Peoples Hosp Shuangliu Dist Chengdu 1, Dept Gen Surg, West China Airport Hosp, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[5] Nanchong Cent Hosp, Dept Pain Treatment, Nanchong, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Etomidate; Myoclonus; Propofol; Meta-analysis; DEXMEDETOMIDINE; PRETREATMENT; PREVENTION; SEDATION; INDUCTION; GLUTAMATE; SAFETY; TRIAL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Myoclonus is one of the main complications of etomidate anesthesia, which would develop into serious consequences during surgery. The present analysis was performed to evaluate systematically the effect of propofol on preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus in adult patients.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematic electronic literature search was performed in the data-bases PubMed, Cochrane Library, OVID, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CN-KI) from inception to May 20, 2021, without any language restrictions. All randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of propofol on preventing etomidate-induced myoclonus were enrolled. The primary outcome included the incidence and degree of etomidate-induced myoclonus.RESULTS: 1,420 patients (with 602 received etomidate anesthesia and 818 received propofol plus etomidate anesthesia) from 13 studies were eventually included. Whatever the intravenous propofol dose for anesthesia induction 0.8-2 mg/kg (RR:4.04, 95% CI [2.42,6.74] p < 0.0001, I-2=56.5%), or the dose of propofol for anesthesia induction 0.5-0.8 mg/kg (RR:3.26, 95% CI [2.03,5.22] p < 0.0001, I-2=0%), or the dose of propofol for anesthesia induction 0.25-0.5mg/ kg (RR:1.68, 95% CI [1.1,2.56] p=0.0160, I2=0%), combination of propofol and etomidate could significantly decrease the occurrence of etomidate-related myoclonus (RR=2.99, 95% CI [2.40, 3.71] p < 0.0001, I-2=43.4%), compared with eto-midate alone. In addition, propofol plus etomidate attenuated the incidence of mild (RR:3.40, 95% CI [1.7,6.82] p=0.0010, I-2=54.3%), moderate (RR:5.4, 95% CI [3.01, 9.67] p < 0.0001, I-2=12.6%), severe (RR:4.15, 95% CI [2.11, 8.13] p < 0.0001, I-2=0%) of etomidate-induced myoclonus without adverse effects except for the increased incidence of pain on injection (RR:0.47, 95% CI [0.26, 0.83] p=0.0100, I-2=41.5%) compared with etomidate alone.CONCLUSIONS: The meta-analysis currently generates the evidence of combination of propofol with the dosage of 0.25-2 mg/kg and etomidate can alleviate the occurrence and severity of etomidate-induced myoclonus, with decreased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and comparative side effects of hemodynamic and respiratory depression of patients in comparison with etomidate alone.
引用
收藏
页码:1322 / 1335
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of ondansetron compared to lidocaine and placebo for reducing propofol injection pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zaazouee, Mohamed Sayed
    Mahmoud, Abdelrahman Mohamed
    Elfar, Waleed Hosny
    Hana, Kerolous
    Shamshoon, Kerollos F.
    Adly, Michael H.
    Hussein, Tarek A.
    Hamza, Mohammad M.
    Aly, Abrar Abdelhamid
    Eguzo, Mohammed Ahmed
    Farhat, Abdullah Mohamed
    Elsnhory, Ahmed Bostamy
    Morsy, Mohammed Hassan
    Ammar, Manar Farag
    Alnaji, Abdalrhman Abdalmajid
    Elshanbary, Alaa Ahmed
    Shah, Jaffer
    AbdelQadir, Yossef Hassan
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (38) : E35021
  • [32] Comparison of propofol monotherapy and propofol combination therapy for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoon, Sang Won
    Choi, Geun Joo
    Lee, Oh Haeng
    Yoon, Il Jae
    Kang, Hyun
    Baek, Chong Wha
    Jung, Yong Hun
    Woo, Young Cheol
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 30 (05) : 580 - 591
  • [33] Quantitative Analysis of Propofol Dosage in Cannabis Users: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Baker, Maxwell B.
    Binda, Dhanesh D.
    Nozari, Ala
    Kennedy, Joseph M.
    Dienes, Erin
    Baker, William E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (03)
  • [34] Clinical efficacy of xenon versus propofol: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xia, Yimeng
    Fang, Hongwei
    Xu, Jindong
    Jia, Chenfei
    Tao, Guorong
    Yu, Buwei
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (20)
  • [35] The Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Zhang, Rongzan
    Lu, Quan
    Wu, Younong
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2018, 28 (03): : 153 - 158
  • [36] Risk of regorafenib-induced cardiovascular events in patients with solid tumorsA systematic review and meta-analysis A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Jianxin
    Wang, Junhui
    MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (41)
  • [37] Effect of cannabinoid consumption on propofol dosage: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bornemann-Cimenti, Helmar
    Lang-Illievich, Kordula
    Neuwersch-Sommeregger, Stefan
    Lang, Johanna
    Danninger, Thomas
    Hammer, Sascha
    Szilagyi, Istvan-Szilard
    Klivinyi, Christoph
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2025, 134 (03) : 875 - 878
  • [38] Comparison of Remimazolam-Flumazenil versus Propofol for Recovery from General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Quantong
    Xu, Fuchao
    Wang, Jie
    Jiang, Ming
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (23)
  • [39] Systematic review and meta-analysis of Saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients
    McFarland, Lynne V.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2010, 16 (18) : 2202 - 2222
  • [40] Systematic review and meta-analysis of Saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients
    Lynne V McFarland
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010, 16 (18) : 2202 - 2222