A novel approach for developing left bundle branch pacing and left bundle branch block in a canine model

被引:4
作者
Hu, Yiran [1 ,2 ]
Cheng, Sijing [1 ]
He, Pengkang [3 ]
Huang, Hao [1 ]
Li, Hui [1 ]
Weng, Sixian [1 ]
Sun, Xue Rong [1 ]
Gu, Min [1 ]
Niu, Hongxia [1 ]
Liu, Xi [1 ]
Jin, Han [1 ,3 ]
Zhou, Xiaohong [4 ]
Hua, Wei [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Cardiac Arrhythmia Ctr, Natl Clin Res Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, Fuwai Hosp,DepT Cardiol,State Key Lab Cardiovasc D, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Beijing Tiantan Hosp, Dept Cardiol & Macrovasc Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Medtronic Plc, Dept Cardiol, Cardiac Rhythm Management, Mounds View, MN USA
[5] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Fuwai Hosp, Cardiac Arrhythmia Ctr, Natl Ctr Cardiovasc Dis, 167 Beilishi Rd, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
animal model; canine; heart failure; left bundle branch block; left bundle branch pacing; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; HEART; MORPHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1111/jce.15854
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and ObjectiveLeft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has shown the benefits in the treatment of dyssynchronous heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study was to develop a novel approach for LBBP and left bundle branch block (LBBB) in a canine model. MethodsA "triangle-center" method by tricuspid valve annulus angiography for LBBP implantation was performed in 6 canines. A catheter was then applied for retrograde His potential recording and left bundle branch (LBB) ablation simultaneously. The conduction system was stained to verify the "triangle-center" method for LBBP and assess the locations of the LBB ablation site in relation to the left septal fascicle (LSF). ResultsThe mean LBB potential to ventricular interval and stimulus-peak left ventricular activation time were 11.8 +/- 1.2 and 35.7 +/- 3.1 ms, respectively. The average intrinsic QRS duration was 44.7 +/- 4.7 ms. LBB ablation significantly prolonged the QRS duration (106.3 +/- 8.3 ms, p < .001) while LBBP significantly shortened the LBBB-QRS duration to 62.5 +/- 5.3 ms (p < .001). After 6 weeks of follow-up, both paced QRS duration (63.0 +/- 5.4 ms; p = .203) and LBBB-QRS duration (107.3 +/- 7.4 ms; p = .144) were unchanged when comparing to the acute phase, respectively. Anatomical analysis of 6 canine hearts showed that the LBBP lead-tip was all placed in LSF area. ConclusionThe new approach for LBBP and LBBB canine model was stable and feasible to simulate the clinical dyssynchrony and resynchronization. It provided a useful tool to investigate the basic mechanisms of underlying physiological pacing benefits.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1005
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A long-term clinical comparative study of left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block [J].
Zhuo, Jinhui ;
Chen, Canghao ;
Lin, Junhua ;
Wang, Jing ;
Fu, Fayuan .
HEART AND VESSELS, 2025,
[32]   Left bundle branch pacing vs biventricular pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Yasmin, Farah ;
Moeed, Abdul ;
Ochani, Rohan Kumar ;
Raheel, Hamna ;
Awan, Malik Ali Ehtsham ;
Liaquat, Ayesha ;
Saleem, Arisha ;
Aamir, Muhammad ;
Hawwa, Nael ;
Surani, Salim .
WORLD JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 16 (01) :40-48
[33]   Left bundle branch area pacing in patients with baseline narrow, left, or right bundle branch block QRS patterns: insights into electrocardiographic and echocardiographic features [J].
Mirolo, Adrian ;
Chaumont, Corentin ;
Auquier, Nathanael ;
Savoure, Arnaud ;
Godin, Benedicte ;
Vandevelde, Florence ;
Eltchaninoff, Helene ;
Anselme, Frederic .
EUROPACE, 2023, 25 (02) :526-535
[34]   Clinical Outcomes of Permanent Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Left Bundle Branch Block and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction >35 vs. ≤35% [J].
Jiang, Zhixin ;
Wu, Tian ;
Wu, Yixian ;
Chen, Zenghong ;
Yang, Wen ;
Chen, Chongchong ;
Zhou, Xiujuan ;
Shan, Qijun .
FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2022, 9
[35]   Left bundle branch pacing is the best approach to physiological pacing [J].
Padala, Santosh K. ;
Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. .
HEART RHYTHM O2, 2020, 1 (01) :59-67
[36]   Durability of left bundle branch area pacing [J].
Mehta, Nikhil A. ;
Saqi, Bilal ;
Sabzwari, Syed R. A. ;
Gupta, Rahul ;
Vyas, Apurva ;
Gordon, Jeffrey ;
Cossu, Sergio ;
Nazir, Talha ;
Freudenberger, Ronald ;
Bozorgnia, Babak .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (07) :1529-1536
[37]   My preferred approach to left bundle branch pacing: Lumenless leads [J].
Ponnusamy, Shunmuga Sundaram ;
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi .
HEART RHYTHM O2, 2023, 4 (02) :147-153
[38]   Left Bundle Branch Pacing Optimized Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy A Novel Approach [J].
Vijayaraman, Pugazhendhi .
JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 7 (08) :1076-1078
[39]   Left bundle branch area pacing results in more physiological ventricular activation than biventricular pacing in patients with left bundle branch block heart failure [J].
Sussenbek, Ondrej ;
Rademakers, Leonard ;
Waldauf, Petr ;
Jurak, Pavel ;
Smisek, Radovan ;
Stros, Petr ;
Poviser, Lukas ;
Vesela, Jana ;
Plesinger, Filip ;
Halamek, Josef ;
Leinveber, Pavel ;
Herman, Dalibor ;
Osmancik, Pavel ;
Curila, Karol .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL SUPPLEMENTS, 2023, 25 :E17-E24
[40]   Long-term outcomes of left bundle branch area pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with heart failure and complete left bundle branch block [J].
Hua, Juan ;
Chen, Yang ;
Yu, Jianhua ;
Xiong, Qinmei ;
Xia, Zhen ;
Xia, Zirong ;
Huang, Qianghui ;
Kong, Qiling ;
Chen, Huolong ;
Zhang, Yichu ;
Hu, Jianxin ;
Li, Juxiang ;
Hu, Jinzhu ;
Chen, Qi ;
Hong, Kui .
HEART AND VESSELS, 2022, 37 (07) :1162-1174