Disclosure Speed: Evidence from Nonpublic SEC Investigations

被引:6
作者
Blackburne, Terrence P. [1 ]
Quinn, Phillip J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, Coll Business, Dept Accounting, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Michael G Foster Sch Business, Dept Accounting, Seattle, WA USA
关键词
SEC investigations; private information; litigation risk; external monitors; disclosure; managerial entrenchment; CEO turnover; SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION; VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE; INFORMATION; NEWS; FIRM; OWNERSHIP; MANAGERS; EARNINGS; COSTS; FRAUD;
D O I
10.2308/TAR-2019-0407
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
We examine cross-sectional variation in disclosure speed by using data that allow us to measure when managers learn of SEC investigations and the time lag until subsequent disclosures. We document that external monitoring and litigation risk are associated with 99 percent and 39 percent faster disclosure, and managerial entrenchment with 28 percent slower disclosure. When revelations by external parties preempt managers' disclosures, we observe a significant increase in bid-ask spreads that persists for at least three years following the close of the investigation and a higher likelihood of turnover for less entrenched CEOs. We also document that firms whose managers disclose investigations are subject to fewer subsequent securities class action lawsuits. Our results are consistent with managers balancing the costs of fast disclosure, including immediate stock price declines and potential reputational costs, with the risks of having external parties leak news of SEC investigations.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 82
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SEC comment letters and firm disclosure
    Bozanic, Zahn
    Dietrich, J. Richard
    Johnson, Bret A.
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2017, 36 (05) : 337 - 357
  • [42] Extent and drivers of CSR disclosure: evidence from Russia
    Bhatia, Aparna
    Makkar, Binny
    TRANSNATIONAL CORPORATIONS REVIEW, 2019, 11 (03) : 190 - 207
  • [43] Reluctant Disclosure and Transparency: Evidence from Environmental Disclosures
    Fabrizio, Kira R.
    Kim, Eun-Hee
    ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2019, 30 (06) : 1207 - 1231
  • [44] Styles of Regulators: Evidence from the SEC's Comment Letters†
    Do, Truc Thuc
    Zhang, Huai
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2022, 39 (02) : 789 - 825
  • [45] DISCLOSURE AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: EVIDENCE FROM RUSSIAN COMPANIES
    Berezinets, I. V.
    Muravyev, A. A.
    ROSSIISKII ZHURNAL MENEDZHMENTA-RUSSIAN MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2024, 22 (02): : 193 - 222
  • [46] Board characteristics and cybersecurity disclosure: evidence from the UK
    Alodat, Ahmad Yuosef
    Hao, Yunhong
    Nobanee, Haitham
    Ali, Hazem
    Mansour, Marwan
    Al Amosh, Hamzeh
    ELECTRONIC COMMERCE RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [47] Underpricing and Intellectual Capital Disclosure: Evidence from Indonesia
    Widarjo, Wahyu
    Rahmawati
    Bandi
    Widagdo, Ari Kuncara
    GLOBAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2019,
  • [48] Does Recognition versus Disclosure Affect Value Relevance? Evidence from Pension Accounting
    Yu, Kun
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2013, 88 (03) : 1095 - 1127
  • [49] Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Investment Decisions: Evidence from Saudi Indexed Companies
    Kouaib, Amel
    Amara, Ines
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (11)
  • [50] Does Intellectual Capital Disclosure Matter for Audit Risk? Evidence from the UK and Italy
    Demartini, Chiara
    Trucco, Sara
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (09):