Properties and Implementation of 3-Dimensionally Printed Models in Spine Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Review With Meta-Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Pearce, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Novak, James [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Wijesekera, Akila [1 ]
Loch-Wilkinson, Thorbjorn [1 ]
Redmond, Michael [1 ]
Winter, Craig [1 ,2 ]
Alexander, Hamish [1 ,2 ]
Maclachlan, Liam [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Royal Brisbane & Womens Hosp, Kenneth G Jamieson Dept Neurosurg, Brisbane, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Sch Med, Brisbane, Australia
[3] Herston Biofabricat Inst, Metro North, Brisbane, Australia
[4] Univ Queensland, Sch Architecture, Brisbane, Australia
[5] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Mech Med & Proc Engn, Brisbane, Australia
[6] Univ Queensland, Sch Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Brisbane, Australia
关键词
3D printing; Biofabrication; Education; Neurosurgery; Surgical simulation; Spine surgery; CLINICAL-APPLICATION; SURGICAL-TREATMENT; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/J.WnEU.2022.10.083
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Spine surgery addresses a wide range of spinal pathologies. Potential applications of 3-dimensional (3D) printed in spine surgery are broad, encompassing education, planning, and simulation. The objective of this study was to explore how 3D-printed spine models are implemented in spine surgery and their clinical applications. - METHODS: Methods were combined to create a scoping review with metaanalyses. PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched from 2011 to 7 September 2021. Results were screened independently by 2 reviewers. Studies utilizing 3D-printed spine models in spine surgery were included. Articles describing drill guides, implants, or nonoriginal research were excluded. Data were extracted according to reporting guidelines in relation to study information, use of model, 3D printer and printing material, design features of the model, and clinical use/patient-related outcomes. Metaanalyses were performed using random-effects models. - RESULTS: Forty articles were included in the review, 3 of which were included in the meta-analysis. Primary use of the spine models included preoperative planning, education, and simulation. Six printing technologies were utilized. A range of substrates were used to recreate the spine and regional pathology. Models used for preoperative and intraoperative planning showed reductions in key surgical performance indicators. Generally, feedback for the tactility, utility, and education use of models was favorable. - CONCLUSIONS: Replicating realistic spine models for operative planning, education, and training is invaluable in a subspeciality where mistakes can have devastating repercussions. Future study should evaluate the costeffectiveness and the impact spine models have of spine surgery outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 72
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Irrigation techniques used in spine surgery for surgical site infection prophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Torres, Kabir A.
    Konrade, Elliot
    White, Jacob
    Tavares Junior, Mauro Costa M.
    Bunch, Joshua T.
    Burton, Douglas
    Jackson, R. Sean
    Birlingmair, Jacob
    Carlson, Brandon B.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [42] Impact of intraoperative intravenous magnesium on spine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yue, Lei
    Lin, Zeng-Mao
    Mu, Guan-Zhang
    Sun, Hao-Lin
    ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2022, 43
  • [43] Preoperative HbA1c and Postoperative Outcomes in Spine Surgery A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Tao, Xu
    Matur, Abhijith V.
    Palmisciano, Paolo
    Conteh, Fatu S.
    Onyewadume, Louisa
    Duah, Henry O.
    Shukla, Geet
    Vorster, Phillip
    Gupta, Sahil
    Chilakapati, Sai S.
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    SPINE, 2023, 48 (16) : 1155 - 1165
  • [44] Dexmedetomidine as a sedative and analgesic adjuvant in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Georgia G. Tsaousi
    Chryssa Pourzitaki
    Simone Aloisio
    Federico Bilotta
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2018, 74 : 1377 - 1389
  • [45] Do Obese Patients Lose Weight After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Vorster, Phillip
    Matur, Abhijith, V
    Palmisciano, Paolo
    Conteh, Fatu S.
    Onyewadume, Louisa
    Duah, Henry O.
    Shukla, Geet G.
    Chilakapati, Sai S.
    Tao, Xu
    Gupta, Sahil
    Shah, Sanjit
    Motley, Benjamin
    Cheng, Joseph
    Virojanapa, Justin
    Adogwa, Owoicho
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 175 : 122 - +
  • [46] Risk-benefit analysis of wound drain usage in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis with evidence summary
    Muthu, Sathish
    Ramakrishnan, Eswar
    Natarajan, Karthick Kumar
    Chellamuthu, Girinivasan
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 29 (09) : 2111 - 2128
  • [47] Does Workers' Compensation Status Affect Outcomes after Lumbar Spine Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Russo, Fabrizio
    De Salvatore, Sergio
    Ambrosio, Luca
    Vadala, Gianluca
    Fontana, Luca
    Papalia, Rocco
    Rantanen, Jorma
    Iavicoli, Sergio
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (11)
  • [48] Advantages of 3-dimensional exoscope-assisted anterior cervical spine surgery: A meta-analysis
    Lei, Fuhao
    Xie, Yizhou
    Fu, Jin
    Xie, Zhe
    Zhang, Miaosheng
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2023, 165 (10) : 3077 - 3087
  • [49] Impact of sarcopenia on outcomes following lumbar spine surgery for degenerative disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Michael Jian-Wen
    Lo, Yuan-Shun
    Lin, Chia-Yu
    Tseng, Chun
    Hsiao, Pang-Hsuan
    Lai, Chien-Ying
    Li, Ling-Yi
    Chen, Hsien-Te
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (09) : 3369 - 3380
  • [50] Utility of prolonged prophylactic systemic antibiotics for wound drains in posterior spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pivazyan, Gnel
    Khan, Ziam
    Williams, Josef D.
    Kim, Alexander J.
    Rush, Deja M.
    Cobourn, Kelsey D.
    Patel, Nirali
    Nair, M. Nathan
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2023, 38 (05) : 585 - 594