Effects of video-based patient preparation for MRI on clinical processes and patient experience

被引:3
作者
Madl, Janika [1 ,3 ]
Janka, Rolf [2 ]
Bay, Susanne [1 ,3 ]
Sturmbauer, Sarah C. [1 ]
Rohleder, Nicolas [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich Alexander Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Chair Hlth Psychol, Nagelsbachstr 49a, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Dept Radiol, Maximilianspl 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Allee Rothelheimpk 21, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Patient education; Patient outcome assessment; Artifacts; Organizational efficiency; MEDICAL PROCEDURES; MOTION ARTIFACTS; REDUCE ANXIETY; HYPNOSIS; INFORMATION; INTERVENTIONS; ANALGESIA; TRIAL; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110621
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine whether video-based informational or relaxational preparation reduces the number of unexpected patient-related events and scan duration more efficiently, and to assess how patients evaluate the interventions.Methods: We randomized 142 adult patients (mean age: 48 +/- 16 years) to three groups. The control group (n = 48, 33.8 %) received standard care. The intervention groups watched an informational (n = 50, 35.2 %) or relaxational (n = 44, 31.0 %) video while awaiting their MRI examination. We recorded scan duration, number of motion artifacts/sequence repetitions, and patient-related incidents (e.g., interruptions, premature termina-tion). Subjective evaluation of the interventions was provided by the patients after MRI completion. Results: Mean scan duration for the control, relaxation, and information group was 39.38 +/- 16.62 min, 32.59 +/- 11.67 min, and 34.54 +/- 11.91 min. Compared to the control group, scan duration was significantly shorter in the relaxation, but not in the information group (relaxation vs control: p =.019; information vs control: p =.082). The information and relaxation group did not differ significantly (p =.704). In 35 (24.6 %) patients, one or more sequences were repeated; incidents occurred in six (4.2 %) patients. Neither the frequency of repeated sequences nor incidents differed between the groups (all p >.239). Patients evaluated both videos very positively; the in-formation video received even better evaluations (all p <.027). Conclusion: Additional preparation, especially information, is perceived very positively by patients and at least relaxational preparation may have a positive impact on clinical operations.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Positive effect on patient experience of video information given prior to cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: A clinical trial [J].
Ahlander, Britt-Marie ;
Engvall, Jan ;
Maret, Eva ;
Ericsson, Elisabeth .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2018, 27 (5-6) :1250-1261
[2]   Reducing Clinical MRI Motion Degradation Using a Prescan Patient Information Pamphlet [J].
Ali, Syed H. ;
Modic, Mark E. ;
Mahmoud, Shamseldeen Y. ;
Jones, Stephen E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 200 (03) :630-634
[3]   Toward Quantifying the Prevalence, Severity, and Cost Associated With Patient Motion During Clinical MR Examinations [J].
Andre, Jalal B. ;
Bresnahan, Brian W. ;
Mossa-Basha, Mahmud ;
Hoff, Michael N. ;
Smith, C. Patrick ;
Anzai, Yoshimi ;
Cohen, Wendy A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 12 (07) :689-695
[4]   Attitudes Toward Hypnosis Based on Source of Information and Experience With Hypnosis [J].
Antonio Molina-Peral, Jose ;
Suarez-Rodriguez, Jesus ;
Capafons, Antonio ;
Mendoza, M. Elena .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPNOSIS, 2020, 62 (03) :282-297
[5]  
Astuti HJ., 2014, J MED MARKETING, V14, P191, DOI 10.1177/1745790415578311
[6]   Neurolinguistic programming used to reduce the need for anaesthesia in claustrophobic patients undergoing MRI [J].
Bigley, J. ;
Griffiths, P. D. ;
Prydderch, A. ;
Romanowski, C. A. J. ;
Miles, L. ;
Lidiard, H. ;
Hoggard, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 83 (986) :113-117
[7]   'The situation and the uncertainty about the coming result scared me but interaction with the radiographers helped me through': a qualitative study on patients' experiences of magnetic resonance imaging examinations [J].
Carlsson, Sofia ;
Carlsson, Eva .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2013, 22 (21-22) :3225-3234
[8]  
Chadderdon Alexandra L, 2020, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V29, P157, DOI 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000239
[9]   A study of the effects of patient anxiety, perceptions and equipment on motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Dantendorfer, K ;
Amering, M ;
Bankier, A ;
Helbich, T ;
Prayer, D ;
Youssefzadeh, S ;
Alexandrowicz, R ;
Imhof, H ;
Katschnig, H .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 15 (03) :301-306
[10]   Claustrophobia during magnetic resonance imaging: Cohort study in over 55,000 patients [J].
Dewey, Marc ;
Schink, Tania ;
Dewey, Charles F. .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2007, 26 (05) :1322-1327