Modelling potential natural pest control ecosystem services provided by arthropods in agricultural landscapes

被引:10
|
作者
Perennes, Marie [1 ]
Diekoetter, Tim [2 ]
Hoffmann, Hannes [2 ]
Martin, Emily A. [3 ]
Schroeder, Boris [4 ,5 ]
Burkhard, Benjamin [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Phys Geog & Landscape Ecol, Schneiderberg 50, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[2] Univ Kiel, Dept Landscape Ecol, Olshausenstr 75, D-24118 Kiel, Germany
[3] Leibniz Univ Hannover, Inst Geobot, Zool Biodivers, Nienburgerstr 17, D-30167 Hannover, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Geoecol, Landscape Ecol & Environm Syst Anal, Braunschweig, Germany
[5] Berlin Brandenburg Inst Adv Biodivers Res BBIB, Berlin, Germany
[6] Leibniz Ctr Agr Landscape Res ZALF, Eberswalder Str 84, D-15374 Muncheberg, Germany
关键词
Ensemble species distribution models; Joint species distribution models; Natural enemies; Hierarchical models; Biological control; Landscape complexity; Arthropod community; Species richness; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; BIOLOGICAL-CONTROL; CLIMATE-CHANGE; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS; GENERALIST PREDATORS; SEMINATURAL HABITATS; CONCEPTUAL-FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL-CHANGE; BIOTIC INTERACTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.agee.2022.108250
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Natural pest control has the potential to reduce pesticide use. Therefore, it has an essential role to play in the transition towards a more sustainable agriculture. For the prediction of natural pest control, it is essential to understand the distribution of the species providing this ecosystem service. The presence of pests and natural enemies depends on a combination of abiotic and biotic factors, each playing a determining role at different spatial scales. We developed a hierarchical model composed of environmental predictors including bioclimatic and land use variables at the European scale, as well as landscape complexity and biotic interactions at the landscape scale. This paper presents the predicted distribution of 111 species from seven different arthropod families (two pest aphid species and their natural enemy species) in an agricultural region in northern Germany. The hierarchical framework allows determining the capacity of landscapes to support pest control ecosystem services provided by arthropods at the local scale and informs on vulnerable areas or potential mismatches between natural pest control demand and supply. Thereby it can support the design of local scale measures for habitat improvement, biodiversity conservation and the increase of ecosystem services supply. The hierarchical approach can be adapted to other agroecosystems and leaves potential for further adaptations to improve the prediction of pests and their natural enemy distribution, dynamics and factors influencing their spatial distribution.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Importance of grasslands for biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes
    Larsonneau, P.
    Uijttewaal, A.
    Gendre, S.
    FOURRAGES, 2024, (258):
  • [22] European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review
    Boris T. van Zanten
    Peter H. Verburg
    Maria Espinosa
    Sergio Gomez-y-Paloma
    Giuliano Galimberti
    Jochen Kantelhardt
    Martin Kapfer
    Marianne Lefebvre
    Rosa Manrique
    Annette Piorr
    Meri Raggi
    Lena Schaller
    Stefano Targetti
    Ingo Zasada
    Davide Viaggi
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2014, 34 : 309 - 325
  • [23] European agricultural landscapes, common agricultural policy and ecosystem services: a review
    van Zanten, Boris T.
    Verburg, Peter H.
    Espinosa, Maria
    Gomez-y-Paloma, Sergio
    Galimberti, Giuliano
    Kantelhardt, Jochen
    Kapfer, Martin
    Lefebvre, Marianne
    Manrique, Rosa
    Piorr, Annette
    Raggi, Meri
    Schaller, Lena
    Targetti, Stefano
    Zasada, Ingo
    Viaggi, Davide
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2014, 34 (02) : 309 - 325
  • [24] Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes: Assessment of heritage values and identity
    Tengberg, Anna
    Fredholm, Susanne
    Eliasson, Ingegard
    Knez, Igor
    Saltzman, Katarina
    Wetterberg, Ola
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2012, 2 : 14 - 26
  • [25] Ecosystem services (ES) provided by ditches in a desert agricultural valley
    Cital, Frida
    Ramirez-Hernandez, Jorge
    Garcia-Hernandez, Jaqueline
    Garcia-Leyva, German
    Eliana Rodriguez-Burgueno, J.
    Elizabeth Ramirez-Barreto, Maria
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 174
  • [26] Agricultural expansion and potential implications on ecosystem services in the landscapes of Necochea county, Buenos Aires, Argentina
    Vazquez, Patricia
    Zulaica, Laura
    Sequeira, Nahuel David
    Daga, Daiana Yael
    REVISTA ACTA GEOGRAFICA, 2019, 13 (31): : 171 - 196
  • [27] Soil Arthropods in the Douro Demarcated Region Vineyards: General Characteristics and Ecosystem Services Provided
    Goncalves, Fatima
    Carlos, Cristina
    Crespo, Luis
    Zina, Vera
    Oliveira, Amalia
    Salvacao, Juliana
    Pereira, Jose Alberto
    Torres, Laura
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (14)
  • [28] A framework to identify indicator species for ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes
    Birkhofer, Klaus
    Rusch, Adrien
    Andersson, Georg K. S.
    Bommarco, Riccardo
    Danhardt, Juliana
    Ekbom, Barbara
    Jonsson, Annelie
    Lindborg, Regina
    Olsson, Ola
    Rader, Romina
    Stjernman, Martin
    Williams, Alwyn
    Hedlund, Katarina
    Smith, Henrik G.
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 91 : 278 - 286
  • [29] A conceptual framework for the governance of multiple ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes
    Vialatte, Aude
    Barnaud, Cecile
    Blanco, Julien
    Ouin, Annie
    Choisis, Jean-Philippe
    Andrieu, Emilie
    Sheeren, David
    Ladet, Sylvie
    Deconchat, Marc
    Clement, Floriane
    Esquerre, Diane
    Sirami, Clelia
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2019, 34 (07) : 1653 - 1673
  • [30] Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes-Farmers' perceptions
    Smith, Helen F.
    Sullivan, Caroline A.
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 98 : 72 - 80