Vasopressin Initiation as a Second-Line VasoPressor in Early Septic Shock (VISPSS)

被引:1
作者
Ragoonanan, David [1 ,5 ]
Nickelsen, Paige [2 ]
Tran, Nicolas [3 ]
Allen, Bryan [4 ]
Emborski, Rebecca [1 ]
Legare, Anit [1 ]
Villela, Antonia [1 ]
Hampson, Lauryn [1 ]
Busey, Kirsten [1 ]
Shomo, Eileen [1 ]
Broomfield, Abby [1 ]
Hailu, Kirubel [4 ]
机构
[1] Sarasota Mem Hosp, Dept Pharm Serv, Sarasota, FL USA
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Pharm Serv, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Tampa Gen Hosp, Dept Pharm Serv, Tampa, FL USA
[4] Ascension St Vincents, Dept Pharm Serv, Jacksonville, FL USA
[5] Sarasota Mem Healthcare Syst, 1700 S Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, FL 34239 USA
关键词
vasopressin; septic shock; vasopressor agents; NOREPINEPHRINE; SEPSIS;
D O I
10.1177/08850666231201364
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background Vasopressin is recommended as a second-line vasoactive agent for the management of septic shock; however, a paucity of data to guide its optimal use remains. The aim was to evaluate the effect of time-to vasopressin initiation and norepinephrine (NE) dose at vasopressin initiation on clinical outcomes in patients presenting with septic shock.Methods This was a multi-centered, retrospective, observational study conducted in patients with septic shock. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients initiated on vasopressin when NE-equivalent dose (NEE) < 0.25 mcg/kg/min or = 0.25 mcg/kg/min. The primary outcome was time-to-vasopressor discontinuation (hours). Secondary outcomes included 28-day in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), fluid balance after 72 hours, and the change in NEE at 12 hours.Results A total of 302 patients were included in this study. After propensity-score matching, 73 patients in each group were identified for analysis. There was no significant difference in the time-to-vasopressor discontinuation (hours) between the groups (88.8 [55-187.5] vs 86.7 [47-172]); p = 0.7815). Fluid balance (mL) at 72 hours was significantly lower when vasopressin was initiated at NEE < 0.25 mcg/kg/min (1769 [71-7287] vs 5762 [1463-8813]; p = 0.0077). A multivariable linear regression showed shorter time to shock resolution with earlier vasopressin initiation, defined as within 4 hours (p < 0.05).Conclusion In this propensity-score matched cohort, vasopressin initiation at NEE < 0.25 mcg/kg/min was not associated with shorter vasopressor duration. There was a lower fluid balance at 72 hours when vasopressin was initiated at lower NE doses.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 312
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Early versus delayed vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock
    Abe, Toshikazu
    Umemura, Yutaka
    Ogura, Hiroshi
    Kushimoto, Shigeki
    Fujishima, Seitaro
    Saitoh, Daizoh
    Gando, Satoshi
    ACUTE MEDICINE & SURGERY, 2023, 10 (01):
  • [32] First-Line Vasopressor Use in Septic Shock and Route of Administration An Epidemiologic Study
    Teja, Bijan
    Bosch, Nicholas A.
    Wijeysundera, Duminda N.
    Wijeysundera, Harindra C.
    Saskin, Refik
    Hill, Andrea D.
    Stelfox, Henry T.
    Walkey, Allan J.
    Wunsch, Hannah
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2022, 19 (10) : 1713 - 1721
  • [33] Vasopressin: a first-line agent for septic shock?
    Vincent, Jean-Louis
    Post, Emiel H.
    NATURE REVIEWS NEPHROLOGY, 2016, 12 (12) : 718 - 719
  • [34] Optimal Vasopressin Initiation in Septic Shock: The OVISS Reinforcement Learning Study
    Kalimouttou, Alexandre
    Kennedy, Jason N.
    Feng, Jean
    Singh, Harvineet
    Saria, Suchi
    Angus, Derek C.
    Seymour, Christopher W.
    Pirracchio, Romain
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2025,
  • [35] Vasopressin and terlipressin as first-line therapy in fulminant ovine septic shock
    S Rehberg
    C Ertmer
    M Lange
    BB Pinto
    A Morelli
    H Van Aken
    F Su
    JL Vincent
    M Westphal
    Critical Care, 12 (Suppl 2):
  • [36] The effect of early vasopressin use on patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Haijun
    Wu, Chenxia
    Shen, Qinkang
    Xu, Hua
    Fang, Yixin
    Mao, Wei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2021, 48 : 203 - 208
  • [37] Prospective Open-label Trial of Early Concomitant Vasopressin and Norepinephrine Therapy versus Initial Norepinephrine Monotherapy in Septic Shock
    Hammond, Drayton A.
    Ficek, Oktawia A.
    Painter, Jacob T.
    McCain, Kelsey
    Cullen, Julia
    Brotherton, Amy L.
    Kakkera, Krishna
    Chopra, Divyan
    Meena, Nikhil
    PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2018, 38 (05): : 531 - 538
  • [38] Effect of Early Administration of Vasopressin on New-Onset Arrhythmia Development in Patients With Septic Shock: A Retrospective, Observational Cohort Study
    McCloskey, Michele M. M.
    Gibson, Gabrielle A. A.
    Pope, Hannah E. E.
    Giacomino, Bria D. D.
    Hampton, Nicholas
    Micek, Scott T. T.
    Kollef, Marin H. H.
    Betthauser, Kevin D. D.
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024, 58 (01) : 5 - 14
  • [40] Does Early Vasopressin in Septic Shock Improve Outcomes? An Important Piece to This Emerging Puzzle Has Arrived
    White, C. Michael
    ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2024, 58 (01) : 86 - 88