Spatiotemporal evolution and multi-scenario prediction of habitat quality in the Yellow River Basin

被引:4
|
作者
Chen, Yanglong [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
He, Zhilin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yue, Tianming [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Mu, Weichen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Qin, Fen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Henan Univ, Coll Geog & Environm Sci, Kaifeng, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ, Key Lab Geospatial Technol Middle & Lower Yellow R, Minist Educ, Kaifeng, Peoples R China
[3] Henan Univ, Henan Ind Technol Acad Spatio Temporal Big Data, Kaifeng, Peoples R China
[4] Henan Univ, Henan Technol Innovat Ctr Spatial Temporal Big Dat, Kaifeng, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION | 2023年 / 11卷
关键词
PLUS model; InVEST model; Yellow River Basin; habitat quality; multi-scenario prediction; ecological conservation and high-quality development; LAND-USE SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEM-SERVICE; MODEL; DYNAMICS; AREA; FLUS;
D O I
10.3389/fevo.2023.1226676
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe Yellow River Basin (YRB) is not only a vital area for maintaining ecological security but also a key area for China's economic and social development. Understanding its land-use change trends and habitat quality change patterns is essential for regional ecological conservation and effective resource allocation.MethodsThis study used the patch-generating land-use simulation (PLUS) and Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs (InVEST) models to analyze and predict the spatial and temporal trends of habitat quality in the YRB from 2000 to 2030 under natural development (ND) and ecological conservation and high-quality development (ECD) scenarios. The PLUS model was used to predict land-use change in 2030 under different scenarios, after which the InVEST model was used to obtain the habitat quality distribution characteristics from the 2000-2030 period.Results(1) The mean values of habitat quality in the YRB in 2000, 2010, and 2020 were 0.6849, 0.6992, and 0.7001, respectively. The mean habitat quality values were moderately high. Spatial distribution characteristics were high in the west and low in the east and along the water. In 2030, habitat quality (0.6993) started to decline under ND, whereas under ECD, there was an indication of substantial improvement in habitat quality (0.7186). (2) The mean habitat degradation values in 2000, 2010, and 2020 were 0.0223, 0.0219, and 0.0231, respectively. The level of habitat degradation showed a decreasing trend, followed by an increasing trend with a stable spatial distribution pattern. The mean level of habitat degradation in 2030 (0.0241) continued to increase under ND, while a substantial decrease in the level of habitat degradation occurred under ECD (0.0214), suggesting that the level of habitat degradation could be effectively contained under the ECD scenario. (3) During the study period, the conversion of building land-both negative and positive-had the most pronounced impact on habitat quality per unit area. Further, the conversion of grassland was shown to be a key land transformation that may either lead to the deterioration or improvement of the ecological environment. The results provide scientifific theoretical support and a decision basis for ecological conservation and the high-quality development of the YRB.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Research on habitat quality in arid urban agglomerations: Influencing mechanisms and multi-scenario simulations
    Han, Chuqiao
    Zheng, Jianghua
    Han, Wanqiang
    Lu, Binbin
    Yu, Wenjie
    Wang, Zhe
    Yang, Juan
    Wu, Jiale
    LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 35 (06) : 2256 - 2273
  • [42] Quantitative assessment of the habitat quality dynamics in Yellow River Basin, China
    Song, Yanan
    Wang, Meng
    Sun, Xiaofang
    Fan, Zemeng
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2021, 193 (09)
  • [43] Quantitative assessment of the habitat quality dynamics in Yellow River Basin, China
    Yanan Song
    Meng Wang
    Xiaofang Sun
    Zemeng Fan
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2021, 193
  • [44] Evolution and Multi-Scenario Prediction of Land Use and Carbon Storage in Jiangxi Province
    Huang, Yue
    Xie, Fangting
    Song, Zhenjiang
    Zhu, Shubin
    FORESTS, 2023, 14 (10):
  • [45] Spatiotemporal pattern and obstacle factors of coupling relationship between habitat quality and urbanization level in the Yellow River Basin, China
    Zhang, Jinye
    Sun, Piling
    Li, Nan
    Mo, Junxiong
    Shen, Dandan
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2024, 196 (09)
  • [46] Loss Harmonizing for Multi-Scenario CTR Prediction
    Liu, Congcong
    Shi, Liang
    Wang, Pei
    Teng, Fei
    Jiang, Xue
    Peng, Changping
    Lin, Zhangang
    Shao, Jingping
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH ACM CONFERENCE ON RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS, RECSYS 2023, 2023, : 195 - 199
  • [47] Study on the Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Urban Resilience in the Yellow River Basin
    Chen, Yu
    Su, Xuyang
    Zhou, Qian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (19)
  • [48] Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecosystem Service value in the Yellow River Basin
    Wang Y.-Q.
    Sun X.-Y.
    Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science, 2024, 45 (05): : 2767 - 2779
  • [49] Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of urban resilience in the Yellow River Basin, China
    JI Xiaomei
    NIE Zhilei
    WANG Kaiyong
    XU Mingxian
    FANG Yuhao
    Regional Sustainability, 2024, 5 (03) : 56 - 70
  • [50] Spatiotemporal evolution and influencing factors of urban shrinkage in the Yellow River Basin, China
    Jin, Zhenxing
    Wang, Chengxin
    Yu, Shangkun
    Zhang, Shuai
    Ding, Xiaoming
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (03):