Experimental qualification of seismic strengthening of URM buildings in Nepal

被引:1
|
作者
Aminulai, Hammed O. [1 ]
Baiguera, Marco [1 ]
Crump, Duncan A. [1 ]
Sextos, Anastasios [2 ]
Kashani, Mohammad M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Fac Engn & Phys Sci, Southampton, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Civil Engn, Bristol, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
URM buildings; Seismic retrofit; Splints and bandages; Seismic performance; MASONRY WALLS; BASE-ISOLATION; PERFORMANCE; EARTHQUAKES; RETROFIT;
D O I
10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108130
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Nepalese buildings are typically constructed using unreinforced masonry (URM) as the lateral load-bearing system. In the 2015 Nepal Gorkha earthquake several URM buildings suffered heavy damage. The limited economic resources available in the country and the challenge of strengthening a large portfolio of buildings highlight the need for low-cost retrofitting techniques. This paper presents a large-scale experimental campaign aimed at quantifying the seismic performance of a typical URM wall when strengthened with splints and bandages. This represents one of the retrofit techniques that are most widely-used in Nepal. A 5 x 3 m URM wall was constructed using 1:6 cement-sand mortar as per the mechanical properties identified by material testing in Nepal. The URM wall was tested under a two-way ramp cyclic loading. Typical crack patterns associated with URM were observed. The wall was subsequently retrofitted with 8 mm rebars as splints and bandages and tested to failure. The results show that the strength of the retrofitted wall is almost twice that of the URM wall. The observed crack damage improved from EMS-98 Grade 2, with horizontal and diagonal shear cracks in the mortar bed, to Grade 1, with hairline cracks on the rendered splints and bandages. Overall, the experiment demonstrated the efficiency of this practical, low-cost retrofitting technique that is tailored to traditional Nepalese URM buildings. This work can be used to advise local stakeholders in the construction industry as well as to act as a benchmark to improve the reliability of fragility functions for URM buildings in Nepal.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Empirical Damage Relationships and Benefit-Cost Analysis for the Seismic Retrofit of URM Buildings
    Paxton, Brandon
    Elwood, Kenneth J.
    Ingham, Jason M.
    EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2017, 33 (03) : 1053 - 1074
  • [42] Optimal seismic retrofitting techniques for URM school buildings located in the southwestern Iberian peninsula
    Segovia-Verjel, Maria-Luisa
    Requena-Garcia-Cruz, Maria-Victoria
    de-Justo-Moscardo, Enrique
    Morales-Esteban, Antonio
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (10):
  • [43] Effect of URM infills on seismic vulnerability of Indian code designed RC frame buildings
    Putul Haldar
    Yogendra Singh
    D.K.Paul
    EarthquakeEngineeringandEngineeringVibration, 2012, 11 (02) : 233 - 241
  • [44] Damage Index Seismic Assessment Methodologies of URM Buildings: A State-of-the-Art Review
    El-Maissi, Ahmad Mohamad
    Kassem, Moustafa Moufid
    Tan, Chee Ghuan
    Fikri, Rijalul
    Mohamed, Fadzli
    ENGINEERING JOURNAL-THAILAND, 2022, 26 (01): : 39 - 53
  • [45] Effect of URM infills on seismic vulnerability of Indian code designed RC frame buildings
    Putul Haldar
    Yogendra Singh
    D. K. Paul
    Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2012, 11 : 233 - 241
  • [46] A risk-based definition of the confidence factor for the seismic assessment of URM existing buildings
    Giusto, Sofia
    Cattari, Serena
    Lagomarsino, Sergio
    XIX ANIDIS CONFERENCE, SEISMIC ENGINEERING IN ITALY, 2023, 44 : 402 - 409
  • [47] STRENGTHENING OF BUILDINGS BY SEISMIC BASE ISOLATION. PROS AND CONS FOR APPLYING THE STRENGTHENING METHOD TO BUILDINGS LOCATED IN BUCHAREST
    Dragomir, Claudiu-Sorin
    Dutu, Andreea
    Borcia, Ioan-Sorin
    SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES E-LAND RECLAMATION EARTH OBSERVATION & SURVEYING ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 2 : 87 - 90
  • [48] Seismic performance of existing low-rise URM buildings considering the addition of new stories
    Shkodrani, Neritan
    Bilgin, Huseyin
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2021, 79 (06) : 767 - 777
  • [49] Seismic performance of URM buildings with in-plane non-stiffened and stiffened timber floors
    Scotta, Roberto
    Trutalli, Davide
    Marchi, Luca
    Pozza, Luca
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 167 : 683 - 694
  • [50] Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Strengthening of Heritage Timber Buildings: A Review
    Shabani, Amirhosein
    Alinejad, Ali
    Teymouri, Mohammad
    Costa, Andre Nascimento
    Shabani, Mahgol
    Kioumarsi, Mahdi
    BUILDINGS, 2021, 11 (12)