Simplified environmental impact tools for agri-food system: A systematic review on trends and future prospective

被引:16
作者
Casson, Andrea [1 ]
Zambelli, Martina [1 ]
Giovenzana, Valentina [1 ]
Tugnolo, Alessio [1 ]
Pampuri, Alessia [1 ]
Vignati, Sara [1 ]
Beghi, Roberto [1 ]
Guidetti, Riccardo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Agr & Environm Sci Prod Landscape Agroenergy, Via Celoria 2, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
Food; Life cycle assessment; Calculators; Sustainability; Chemometrics; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107175
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental impact mitigation is a challenge for the agri-food system, and companies are continuously asked to be as environmentally friendly as possible. Solutions provided by policies tried to simplify Life Cycle Assessment procedures via schemes and guidelines. At the same time, simplified tools and calculators invaded this production chain proposing a simpler and faster approach to environmental sustainability evaluation. This review aims at studying the field of simplified environmental impact tools (SimpEI tools) used in the agrifood chain and examines and categorizes the currently available solutions to support stakeholders in the choice of the most appropriate tool according to different qualitative aspects. The review proposes a critical, multivariate and systematic analysis of the SimpEI tools found, investigating collectively rather than individually and discussing. In addition, a critical analysis of the tools' current state and a prediction of their future were provided. To reach the goal a hybrid search, i.e. systematic review of scientific literature and commercial web research, was performed identifying 79 SimpEI tools. Hence, quality parameters and relative classes were defined and used as input for multivariate analysis (Principal Component Analysis, PCA) to explore the correlation between tools and intended users. The review findings highlighted a clear separation between the simpler tools characterized by high usability, low data input requirements, and accessibility, and more complex ones described by transparency and results presentation. Finally, strengths and weaknesses of the currently available SimpEI tools in the agri-food system and a discussion on the new frontiers in the development of SimpEI tools were proposed. The development of new SimpEI tools should begin with a shared and unambiguous vision of sustainability, with an effort to understand user needs and a continuous communication process to improve methodological choices and better integrate the needs of the end user into the tool. This would entail creating streamlined, but TaylorMade environmental impact tools.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [11] Food Chain Evaluator, a tool for analyzing the impacts and designing scenarios for the institutional catering in Lombardy (Italy)
    Caputo, Paola
    Clementi, Matteo
    Ducoli, Chiara
    Corsi, Stefano
    Scudo, Gianni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 140 : 1014 - 1026
  • [12] Environmental impact of a new concept of food service: A case study for the re-use of naval shipping containers
    Casson, Andrea
    Giovenzana, Valentina
    Tugnolo, Alessio
    Fiorindo, Ilaria
    Beghi, Roberto
    Guidetti, Riccardo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 274
  • [13] AppEcoBIO: a tool for the economic and environmental evaluation of organic farms in Umbria (Italy)
    Cecchini, L.
    Barbanera, M.
    Chiorri, M.
    [J]. GREEN METAMORPHOSES: AGRICULTURE, FOOD, ECOLOGY, 2020, : 187 - 195
  • [14] Selection of appropriate calculators for landscape-scale greenhouse gas assessment for agriculture and forestry
    Colomb, Vincent
    Touchemoulin, Ophelie
    Bockel, Louis
    Chotte, Jean-Luc
    Martin, Sarah
    Tinlot, Marianne
    Bernoux, Martial
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (01):
  • [15] Dolezal F., 2016, COST ACTION FP, V1407, P2
  • [16] CalcPEFDairy: A Product Environmental Footprint compliant tool for a tailored assessment of raw milk and dairy products
    Egas, D.
    Ponsa, S.
    Colon, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 260
  • [17] ISO, 2021, UNI EN ISO 14040:2021
  • [18] Jolliffe I.T., 2003, Technometrics, V45, P276, DOI [10.1198/tech.2003.s783, DOI 10.1198/TECH.2003.S783]
  • [19] Measurement and communication of greenhouse gas emissions from US food consumption via carbon calculators
    Kim, Brent
    Neff, Roni
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 69 (01) : 186 - 196
  • [20] Carbon accounting tools: are they fit for purpose in the context of arable cropping?
    Lewis, Kathleen A.
    Green, Andrew
    Warner, Douglas J.
    Tzilivakis, John
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 11 (02) : 159 - 175