Efficacy and safety of various endosurgical procedures for management of large renal stone: a systemic review and network meta-analysis of randomised control trials

被引:14
作者
Awedew, Atalel Fentahun [1 ]
Alemu, Chalachew Tenna [1 ]
Yalew, Dawit Zerihun [1 ]
机构
[1] Addis Ababa Univ, Dept Surg, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
关键词
Nephrolithiasis; PCNL; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Renal stone; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Ureteroscopy; RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; MINI PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; CLINICAL-RESEARCH OFFICE; CM; UROLITHIASIS; STANDARD; COMPLICATIONS; DIAMETER; DISEASE; KIDNEY;
D O I
10.1007/s00240-023-01459-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Urolithiasis is the most common benign urological health condition. It has contributed sizeable burden of morbidity, disability, and medical health expenditure worldwide. There is limited high level of evidence on the efficacy and safety of treatment options of large renal stones. This network meta-analysis has examined the effectiveness and safety of various large renal stone management strategies. Systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) study design was employed to summarize comparative randomized controlled trials on humans with a diagnosis of renal stone larger than or equal to 2 cm in size. Our searching strategy was based on the Population, Interventions, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study (PICOS) approach. Medline via PubMed, Embase, Google scholar, SCOPUS, Science Direct, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to March 2023 to find eligible articles. Data extraction, screening, selection and risk of bias assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. We found ten randomised control trials which consists 2917 patients, nine of them were labeled as low risk and one article was high risk. This network meta-analysis found that SFR was 86% (95% CI 84-88%) for Mini-PCNL, 86% (95% CI 84-88%) for standard PCNL, 79% (95% CI:73-86%) for RIRS, and 67% (95%CI:49-81 for staged URS for management of large renal stone. Overall complication rate was 32% (95% CI 27-38%) for standard PCNL, 16% (95% CI 12-21%) for Mini-PCNL, and 11% (95% CI 7-16%) for RIRS. Mini-PCNL (RR = 1.14 (95% CI 1.01-1.27) and PCNL (RR = 1.13 (95% CI 1.01-1.27)) were statistically associated with a higher SFR compared to RIRS. The pooled mean hospital stays were 1.56 days (95% CI 0.93-2.19) for RIRS, 2.96 days (95% CI 1.78-4.14) for Mini-PCNL, 3.9 days (95% CI 2.9-4.83) for standard PCNL, and 3.66 (95% CI 1.13-6.2) for staged URS. Mini-PCNL and standard PCNL were the most effective treatment options with significant morbidity and length of hospital stay, while RIRS was the safest management option with acceptable SFR, low morbidity, and short hospital stay.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy to treat renal stones 20 mm or larger in diameter using holmium:YAG laser [J].
Ali, Ayman ;
Mostafa, Hany ;
Ismail, Ahmed ;
Gamal, Mohamed ;
Salah, Ahmed ;
Roshdy, Mamdouh .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 38 (04) :766-771
[2]   Use of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to Calculate the Impact of Obesity and Diabetes on Cost and Prevalence of Urolithiasis in 2030 [J].
Antonelli, Jodi A. ;
Maalouf, Naim M. ;
Pearle, Margaret S. ;
Lotan, Yair .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2014, 66 (04) :724-729
[3]   Constructing a Search Strategy and Searching for Evidence [J].
Aromataris, Edoardo ;
Riitano, Dagmara .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NURSING, 2014, 114 (05) :49-56
[4]  
Assimos D, 2016, J UROLOGY, V196, P1161, DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091
[5]   Retrograde intra renal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2 cm. A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Barone, Biagio ;
Crocetto, Felice ;
Vitale, Raffaele ;
Di Domenico, Dante ;
Caputo, Vincenzo ;
Romano, Francesco ;
De Luca, Luigi ;
Bada, Maida ;
Imbimbo, Ciro ;
Prezioso, Domenico .
MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (04) :441-450
[6]   A Randomized Controlled Study to Analyze the Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Nephrolithotripsy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Management of Renal Stones More Than 2 cm in Diameter [J].
Bryniarski, Piotr ;
Paradysz, Andrzej ;
Zyczkowski, Marcin ;
Kupilas, Andrzej ;
Nowakowski, Krzysztof ;
Bogacki, Rafal .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (01) :52-57
[7]   Comparison of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for kidney stones: A meta-analysis of randomized trials [J].
Chen, Zhong-Jun ;
Yan, You-Ji ;
Zhou, Jia-Jie .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 43 (01) :60-68
[8]   Comparison of Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (Mini PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for the Minimal Invasive Management of Lower Caliceal Stones [J].
Coskun, Alper ;
Eryildirim, Bilal ;
Sarica, Kemal ;
Camur, Emre ;
Can, Utku ;
Saglam, Erkin .
UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 18 (05) :485-490
[9]   Comparison between Retrograde Flexible Ureteroscopy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones of 2-4 cm [J].
Cosmin, Cozma ;
Georgescu, Dragos Adrian ;
Geavlete, Petrisor ;
Popescu, Razvan-Ionut ;
Geavlete, Bogdan .
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (01)
[10]   Kidney stone disease: pathophysiology, investigation and medical treatment [J].
Dawson, Charlotte H. ;
Tomson, Charles R. V. .
CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2012, 12 (05) :467-471