Removing hepatitis C antibody testing for Australian blood donations: A cost-effectiveness analysis

被引:3
作者
Cheng, Qinglu [1 ]
Hoad, Veronica C. C. [2 ]
Choudhury, Avijoy Roy [3 ]
Seed, Clive R. R. [2 ]
Bentley, Peter [2 ,3 ]
Shih, Sophy T. F. [1 ]
Kwon, Jisoo A. A. [1 ]
Gray, Richard T. T. [1 ]
Wiseman, Virginia [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] UNSW Sydney, Kirby Inst, Sydney, Australia
[2] Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Perth, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Western Australia, UWA Med Sch, Perth, WA, Australia
[4] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Global Hlth & Dev, London, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
blood donation testing; blood safety; cost effectiveness; hepatitis C; HUMAN-IMMUNODEFICIENCY-VIRUS; TRANSFUSION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1111/vox.13429
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: The risk of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections is extremely low in Australia. This study aims to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of different testing strategies for HCV infection in blood donations.Materials and Methods: he four testing strategies evaluated in this study were universal testing with both HCV antibody (anti-HCV) and nucleic acid testing (NAT); anti-HCV and NAT for first-time donations and NAT only for repeat donations; anti-HCV and NAT for transfusible component donations and NAT only for plasma for further manufacture; and universal testing with NAT only. A decision-analytical model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of alternative HCV testing strategies. Sensitivity analysis and threshold analysis were conducted to account for data uncertainty.Results: The number of potential transfusion-transmitted cases of acute hepatitis C and chronic hepatitis C was approximately zero in all four strategies. Universal testing with NAT only was the most cost-effective strategy due to the lowest testing cost. The threshold analysis showed that for the current practice to be cost-effective, the residual risks of other testing strategies would have to be at least 1 HCV infection in 2424 donations, which is over 60,000 times the baseline residual risk (1 in 151 million donations).Conclusion: The screening strategy for HCV in blood donations currently implemented in Australia is not cost-effective compared with targeted testing or universal testing with NAT only. Partial or total removal of anti-HCV testing would bring significant cost savings without compromising blood recipient safety.
引用
收藏
页码:471 / 479
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Aisyah DN Shallcross L Hully AJ O'Brien A Hayward A, J VIRAL HEPAT, V25
[2]  
Alliance of Blood Operators, Risk-based decision-making framework for blood safety
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, GUID BLOOD TRANSF SE, V8th ed.
[4]  
Australian Bureau of Statistics, Deaths, Year of occurrence, Age at death, Age-specific death rates, Sex, States, Territories and Australia
[5]   Cost-effectiveness of peginterferon alfa-2b in combination with ribavirin as initial treatment for chronic hepatitis C in Sweden [J].
Bernfort, Lars ;
Sennfalt, Karin ;
Reichard, Olle .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 38 (6-7) :497-505
[6]   Survival after transfusion in the Netherlands [J].
Borkent-Raven, B. A. ;
Janssen, M. P. ;
van der Poel, C. L. ;
Schaasberg, W. P. ;
Bonsel, G. J. ;
van Hout, B. A. .
VOX SANGUINIS, 2011, 100 (02) :196-203
[7]   Relative efficacy of nucleic acid amplification testing and serologic screening in preventing hepatitis C virus transmission risk in seven international regions [J].
Bruhn, Roberta ;
Lelie, Nico ;
Busch, Michael ;
Kleinman, Steven .
TRANSFUSION, 2015, 55 (06) :1195-1205
[8]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, BLOOD SAF BAS
[9]   Is dual testing for hepatitis C necessary? Modelling the risk of removing hepatitis C antibody testing for Australian blood donations [J].
Choudhury, Avijoy Roy ;
Hoad, Veronica C. C. ;
Seed, Clive ;
Bentley, Peter .
VOX SANGUINIS, 2023, 118 (06) :480-487
[10]  
Custer B, 2017, Vox Sang, V112, P526, DOI 10.1111/vox.12538