Alternative science, alternative experts, alternative politics. The roots of pseudoscientific beliefs in Western Europe

被引:2
|
作者
Bordignon, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Urbino Carlo Bo, Dept Econ Soc Polit, Urbino, Italy
[2] Univ Urbino, Carlo Bo Sch Polit & Social Studies, Dept Econ Soc Polit, Piazza Gherardi 4, I-61029 Urbino, Italy
关键词
Pseudoscience; technical expertise; epistemic authority; populism; Covid-19; pandemic; conspiracy; CLIMATE-CHANGE; POPULISM; DEAD;
D O I
10.1080/14782804.2023.2177838
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
The Covid-19 pandemic has given further centrality to science within the public debate. But it has also acted as a great multiplier for pseudoscientific (conspiracy) theories. This exploratory study investigates the determinants of pseudoscientific beliefs in five European countries, using data from a survey conducted in May 2021. The concept of pseudoscience is theoretically framed and then operationalised by constructing a Pseudo-scientific Beliefs Index (PBI). Results show that exposure to scientific information does not 'protect' against unsound scientific claims, if not complemented by a correct understanding of the division of scientific labour. Pseudoscientific views are strongly associated with distrust of official science. But, in the context of today's information abundance, even more relevant is the spread of epistemological populism, which fosters reliance on alternative sources and the pseudo-expertise of 'alternative scientific authorities'. The embrace of 'alternative scientific facts' is also associated with electoral support for populist parties.
引用
收藏
页码:1469 / 1488
页数:20
相关论文
共 29 条