Human-Factors-in-Driving-Loop: Driver Identification and Verification via a Deep Learning Approach using Psychological Behavioral Data

被引:88
作者
Xu, Jiawei [1 ]
Pan, Sicheng [1 ]
Sun, Poly Z. H. [2 ]
Park, Seop Hyeong [3 ]
Guo, Kun [4 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou 325035, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Hallym Univ, Div Software, Chunchon 24252, Gangwon Do, South Korea
[4] Univ Lincoln, Sch Psychol, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
关键词
Driver identification and verification; driver forensics; human factors in driving loop; NETWORKS; VEHICLE;
D O I
10.1109/TITS.2022.3225782
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Driver identification has been popular in the field of driving behavior analysis, which has a broad range of applications in anti-thief, driving style recognition, insurance strategy, and fleet management. However, most studies to date have only researched driver identification without a robust verification stage. This paper addresses driver identification and verification through a deep learning (DL) approach using psychological behavioral data, i.e., vehicle control operation data and eye movement data collected from a driving simulator and an eye tracker, respectively. We design an architecture that analyzes the segmentation windows of three-second data to capture unique driving characteristics and then differentiate drivers on that basis. The proposed model includes a fully convolutional network (FCN) and a squeeze-and-excitation (SE) block. Experimental results were obtained from 24 human participants driving in 12 different scenarios. The proposed driver identification system achieves an accuracy of 99.60% out of 15 drivers. To tackle driver verification, we combine the proposed architecture and a Siamese neural network, and then map all behavioral data into two embedding layers for similarity computation. The identification system achieves significant performance with average precision of 96.91%, recall of 95.80%, F1 score of 96.29%, and accuracy of 96.39%, respectively. Importantly, we scale out the verification system to imposter detection and achieve an average verification accuracy of 90.91%. These results imply the invariable characteristics from human factors rather than other traditional resources, which provides a superior solution for driving behavior authentication systems.
引用
收藏
页码:3383 / 3394
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [31] Lee J., 2021, PROC IEEE INT C CONS, P1
  • [32] Smartwatch-Based Open-Set Driver Identification by Using GMM-Based Behavior Modeling Approach
    Mardi Putri, Rekyan Regasari
    Yang, Ching-Han
    Chang, Chin-Chun
    Liang, Deron
    [J]. IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (04) : 4918 - 4926
  • [33] McKinley S., 1998, COLL REDWOODS, V45, P1049, DOI DOI 10.1142/9789812813381_0003
  • [34] Improving Driver Identification for the Next-Generation of In-Vehicle Software Systems
    Mekki, Abdellah H.
    Bouhout, Afaf
    Berrada, Ismail
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 68 (08) : 7406 - 7415
  • [35] A validation study of driving errors using a driving simulator
    Meuleners, Lynn
    Fraser, Michelle
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2015, 29 : 14 - 21
  • [36] Fleet management: A vehicle and driver assignment model
    Monnerat, Filipe
    Dias, Joana
    Alves, Maria Joao
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 278 (01) : 64 - 75
  • [37] Zero-to-Stable Driver Identification: A Non-Intrusive and Scalable Driver Identification Scheme
    Rahim, Mussadiq Abdul
    Zhu, Liehuang
    Li, Xin
    Liu, Jiamou
    Zhang, Zijian
    Qin, Zhan
    Khan, Salabat
    Gai, Keke
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 69 (01) : 163 - 171
  • [38] Schuster-Bockler Benjamin, 2007, Curr Protoc Bioinformatics, VAppendix 3, p3A, DOI [10.1109/MASSP.1986.1165342, 10.1002/0471250953.bia03as18]
  • [39] Combining Unsupervised Anomaly Detection and Neural Networks for Driver Identification
    Tanprasert, Thitaree
    Saiprasert, Chalermpol
    Thajchayapong, Suttipong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2017,
  • [40] Tschannen M., 2018, P WORKSH BAYES DEEP