Human-Factors-in-Driving-Loop: Driver Identification and Verification via a Deep Learning Approach using Psychological Behavioral Data

被引:88
作者
Xu, Jiawei [1 ]
Pan, Sicheng [1 ]
Sun, Poly Z. H. [2 ]
Park, Seop Hyeong [3 ]
Guo, Kun [4 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Univ, Coll Comp Sci & Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou 325035, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Dept Ind Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[3] Hallym Univ, Div Software, Chunchon 24252, Gangwon Do, South Korea
[4] Univ Lincoln, Sch Psychol, Lincoln LN6 7TS, England
关键词
Driver identification and verification; driver forensics; human factors in driving loop; NETWORKS; VEHICLE;
D O I
10.1109/TITS.2022.3225782
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Driver identification has been popular in the field of driving behavior analysis, which has a broad range of applications in anti-thief, driving style recognition, insurance strategy, and fleet management. However, most studies to date have only researched driver identification without a robust verification stage. This paper addresses driver identification and verification through a deep learning (DL) approach using psychological behavioral data, i.e., vehicle control operation data and eye movement data collected from a driving simulator and an eye tracker, respectively. We design an architecture that analyzes the segmentation windows of three-second data to capture unique driving characteristics and then differentiate drivers on that basis. The proposed model includes a fully convolutional network (FCN) and a squeeze-and-excitation (SE) block. Experimental results were obtained from 24 human participants driving in 12 different scenarios. The proposed driver identification system achieves an accuracy of 99.60% out of 15 drivers. To tackle driver verification, we combine the proposed architecture and a Siamese neural network, and then map all behavioral data into two embedding layers for similarity computation. The identification system achieves significant performance with average precision of 96.91%, recall of 95.80%, F1 score of 96.29%, and accuracy of 96.39%, respectively. Importantly, we scale out the verification system to imposter detection and achieve an average verification accuracy of 90.91%. These results imply the invariable characteristics from human factors rather than other traditional resources, which provides a superior solution for driving behavior authentication systems.
引用
收藏
页码:3383 / 3394
页数:12
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Ahmad N., 2013, Int J Sig Process Syst, V1, P256, DOI [DOI 10.12720/IJSPS.1.2.256-262, 10.12720/ijsps.1.2.256-262]
  • [2] Amin S., 2008, WORLD C ITS, P16
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, 2017 INT JOINT C NEU, DOI DOI 10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966039
  • [4] Siamese Temporal Convolutional Networks for Driver Identification Using Driver Steering Behavior Analysis
    Azadani, Mozhgan Nasr
    Boukerche, Azzedine
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (10) : 18076 - 18087
  • [5] Driving Behavior Analysis Guidelines for Intelligent Transportation Systems
    Azadani, Mozhgan Nasr
    Boukerche, Azzedine
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 23 (07) : 6027 - 6045
  • [6] Driver authentication by quantifying driving style using GPS only
    Banerjee, Tanushree
    Chowdhury, Arijit
    Chakravarty, Tapas
    Ghose, Avik
    [J]. 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS WORKSHOPS (PERCOM WORKSHOPS), 2020,
  • [7] Barthold C, 2011, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P1632, DOI 10.1109/ICSMC.2011.6083905
  • [8] Bromley J., 1993, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, V7, P669, DOI 10.1142/S0218001493000339
  • [9] Byung Il Kwak, 2016, 2016 14th Annual Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST), P211, DOI 10.1109/PST.2016.7906929
  • [10] A "pay-how-you-drive" car insurance approach through cluster analysis
    Carfora, Maria Francesca
    Martinelli, Fabio
    Mercaldo, Francesco
    Nardone, Vittoria
    Orlando, Albina
    Santone, Antonella
    Vaglini, Gigliola
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 23 (09) : 2863 - 2875