The minimal clinically important difference in the treadmill six-minute walk test in active women with breast cancer during and after oncological treatments

被引:8
|
作者
Cantarero-Villanueva, Irene [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Postigo-Martin, Paula [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Granger, Catherine L. [4 ,5 ]
Waterland, Jamie [4 ]
Galiano-Castillo, Noelia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Denehy, Linda [6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Hlth Sci Fac, Granada, Spain
[2] Sport & Hlth Res Ctr IMUDs, Granada, Spain
[3] Inst Invest Biomed Ibs GRANADA, Granada, Spain
[4] Univ Melbourne, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Hlth Sci, BAppScPhysio, GDipPhysioCardio, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Allied Hlth Div, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Inst Breathing & Sleep, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
6MWT; breast cancer; minimal clinically important difference; physical function; rehabilitation professionals; treadmill; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DISTANCE; GUIDELINES; SURVIVORS; HALLWAY; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2043461
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose To examine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the treadmill 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in women with breast cancer. Materials and methods A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from 112 women who were undergoing chemotherapy or had undergone anticancer treatment was conducted. Participants completed the 6MWT on a treadmill and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) twice, eight weeks apart. Change in the physical function domain of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 was used to classify the "positive change" subgroup (>= 5 points difference) and the "unchanged" subgroup (<5 points difference). This was combined with the distance difference from the 6MWTs, determining the MCID as the cut-off from the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve (anchor-based determination). The MCID was also determined from (1) the effect size and (2) the difference in standard error (SEM) of the results of the first and second 6MWT (distribution-based determination). Results The MCIDs in the during-chemotherapy group was 66.5 and 41.5 m and those in the after-treatment group to be 41.4 and 40.5 m (SEM and effect size based respectively). Conclusions The MCID in the treadmill 6MWT distance could be used to interpret changes in the physical health status of women with breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:871 / 878
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] The minimal clinically important difference of six-minute walk in Asian older adults
    Kwok, Boon Chong
    Pua, Yong Hao
    Mamun, Kaysar
    Wong, Wai Pong
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2013, 13
  • [2] The minimal clinically important difference of six-minute walk in Asian older adults
    Boon Chong Kwok
    Yong Hao Pua
    Kaysar Mamun
    Wai Pong Wong
    BMC Geriatrics, 13
  • [3] Minimal clinically important difference for improvement in six-minute walk test in persons with knee osteoarthritis after total knee arthroplasty
    King, Lauren K.
    Hawker, Gillian A.
    Stanaitis, Ian
    Woodhouse, Linda
    Jones, C. Allyson
    Waugh, Esther J.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [4] Minimal clinically important difference for improvement in six-minute walk test in persons with knee osteoarthritis after total knee arthroplasty
    Lauren K. King
    Gillian A. Hawker
    Ian Stanaitis
    Linda Woodhouse
    C. Allyson Jones
    Esther J. Waugh
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 23
  • [5] The Six-Minute Walk Test as a Measure of Health in Breast Cancer Patients
    Galiano-Castillo, Noelia
    Arroyo-Morales, Manuel
    Ariza-Garcia, Angelica
    Sanchez-Salado, Carmen
    Fernandez-Lao, Carolina
    Cantarero-Villanueva, Irene
    Martin-Martin, Lydia
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2016, 24 (04) : 508 - 515
  • [6] Six-Minute-Walk Test in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Test Validation and Minimal Clinically Important Difference
    du Bois, Roland M.
    Weycker, Derek
    Albera, Carlo
    Bradford, Williamson Z.
    Costabel, Ulrich
    Kartashov, Alex
    Lancaster, Lisa
    Noble, Paul W.
    Sahn, Steven A.
    Szwarcberg, Javier
    Thomeer, Michiel
    Valeyre, Dominique
    King, Talmadge E., Jr.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2011, 183 (09) : 1231 - 1237
  • [7] Updating the Minimal Important Difference for Six-Minute Walk Distance in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    Holland, Anne E.
    Hill, Catherine J.
    Rasekaba, Tshepo
    Lee, Annemarie
    Naughton, Matthew T.
    McDonald, Christine F.
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 91 (02): : 221 - 225
  • [8] Can the Six-Minute Walk Test Be Used to Individualize Physical Activity Intensity in Patients with Breast Cancer?
    Tubiana-Mathieu, Nicole
    Cornette, Thibault
    Mandigout, Stephane
    Leobon, Sophie
    Vincent, Francois
    Venat, Laurence
    Deluche, Elise
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (22)
  • [9] People at a persistent pain service can walk it, but some struggle to talk about it: Reliability, detectable difference and clinically important difference of the six-minute walk test
    Murdoch, Megan
    Window, Peter
    Morton, Caroline
    O'Donohue, Riley
    Ballard, Emma
    Claus, Andrew
    MUSCULOSKELETAL CARE, 2023, 21 (01) : 221 - 231
  • [10] Dynamics of cardiorespiratory response during and after the six-minute walk test in patients with heart failure
    Yoshimura, Kae
    Urabe, Yukio
    Maeda, Noriaki
    Yuguchi, Satoshi
    Yoshida, Toshinobu
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 36 (04) : 476 - 487