Veterinary drugs in groundwater in a dairy region of central Argentina and risk assessment for human health

被引:1
|
作者
Borello, Julieta Soledad [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Giannini-Kurina, Franca [3 ,4 ]
Grassi, Diego Alejandro [5 ]
Tentor, Gonzalo [6 ]
Canas, Ana Irene [1 ,2 ]
Nassetta, Mirtha Maria [1 ,2 ]
Lepori, Edda Cristina Villaamil [7 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Excelencia Prod & Proc Cordoba, Sede Santa Maria dePunilla, Cordoba, Argentina
[2] Minist Ciencia & Tecnol Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina
[3] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Unidad Fitopatol & Modelizac Agr UFYMA, Cordoba, Argentina
[4] Aarhus Univ, Dept Agroecol, Soil Fertil, Aarhus, Denmark
[5] Analyt Technol, Buenos Aires, Provincia De Bu, Argentina
[6] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Fac Ciencias Agr, Dept Prod Anim, Cordoba, Argentina
[7] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Farm & Bioquim, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[8] Ituzaingo 414, RA-X5000 Cordoba, Argentina
关键词
dairy farms; drinking water; health risk assessment; HPLC-MS/MS; veterinary drugs; EMERGING POLLUTANTS; DRINKING-WATER; TAP WATER; ANTIBIOTICS; PHARMACEUTICALS; FOOD; RESIDUES; REMOVAL; SAFETY; FATE;
D O I
10.1002/tqem.22042
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Veterinary drugs used in dairy production are potential contaminants of surface or groundwater sources, being able to affect human and environmental health. It is known that chronic exposure to antibiotics in low concentrations present in water can generate microbial resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of veterinary drugs in 53 groundwater samples used for animal and human consumption, collected in dairy milking parlors, in an important milk-producing area of central Argentina, and to assess the risk to human health when they are used as drinking water. In 75% of the total samples analyzed, at least one veterinary drug was detected. The most frequently found drugs in water samples were the antibiotics tetracycline in 58.5% and oxytetracycline in 56.6%, and an anti-inflammatory, flunixin in 39.6%. In the water samples, the tetracycline and oxytetracycline concentrations were between 0.1 and 5.3 mu g/L and flunixin concentrations were between 0.01 and 2.1 mu g/L. The frequency of appearance and the concentration levels of the substances found in the water samples were evaluated according to the productivity, size, and production system (confined or pasture) of the dairy farms. Higher concentrations and proportions of water samples containing antibiotics were observed when the number of animals per dairy farm was >182 and when the productivity was high (>25 liters per animal per day). In the case of flunixin, the percentage of detection was similar in all evaluated categories. The risk assessment for children and adults, considering the intake of drinking water containing residues of these drugs, did not indicate a significant health risk. It would be advisable to evaluate other sources of drinking water, both surface and underground, in other regions of the country, to provide data to assess the impact of these substances and the other contaminants on environmental and human health.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 255
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Arsenic contamination, induced symptoms, and health risk assessment in groundwater of Lahore, Pakistan
    Rehman, Habib Ur
    Ahmed, Saeed
    Rahman, Mujeeb Ur
    Mehmood, Muhammad Sajid
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (33) : 49796 - 49807
  • [42] Health risk assessment of groundwater contaminated with methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
    Hartley, WR
    Englande, AJ
    Harrington, DJ
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 39 (10-11) : 305 - 310
  • [43] Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Animal Products Commercialized in the Border Region of Brazil, Argentina, and Uruguay
    Soares, Vanessa Mendonca
    Pereira, Juliano Goncalves
    Barreto, Fabiano
    Jank, Louise
    Rau, Renata Batista
    Dias Ribeiro, Cristina Belissimo
    Castilhos, Tamara dos Santos
    Tomaszewski, Caroline Andrade
    Hillesheim, Daniel Rodrigo
    Mondadori, Rafael Gianella
    Tadielo, Leonardo Ereno
    Rodrigues dos Santos, Emanoelli Aparecida
    da Cruz Encide Sampaio, Aryele Nunes
    Cerqueira-Cezar, Camila Koutsodontis
    Duval, Eduarda Hallal
    da Silva, Wladimir Padilha
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2022, 85 (06) : 980 - 986
  • [44] Occurrence of pharmaceuticals in a water supply system and related human health risk assessment
    Gaffney, Vanessa de Jesus
    Almeida, Cristina M. M.
    Rodrigues, Alexandre
    Ferreira, Elisabete
    Benoliel, Maria Joao
    Cardoso, Vitor Vale
    WATER RESEARCH, 2015, 72 : 199 - 208
  • [45] Spatial analysis of groundwater quality and human health risk assessment in parts of Raebareli district, India
    Shukla, Saurabh
    Saxena, Abhishek
    Khan, Ramsha
    Li, Peiyue
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2021, 80 (24)
  • [46] Groundwater fluoride and nitrate contamination and associated human health risk assessment in South Punjab, Pakistan
    Iqbal, Javed
    Su, Chunli
    Wang, Mengzhu
    Abbas, Hasnain
    Baloch, Muhammad Yousuf Jat
    Ghani, Junaid
    Ullah, Zahid
    Huq, Md. Enamul
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (22) : 61606 - 61625
  • [47] Micropollutants in groundwater from septic systems: Transformations, transport mechanisms, and human health risk assessment
    Yang, Yun-Ya
    Toor, Gurpal S.
    Wilson, P. Chris
    Williams, Clinton F.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2017, 123 : 258 - 267
  • [48] Investigation of Radon in Groundwater and the Corresponding Human-Health Risk Assessment in Northeastern Saudi Arabia
    Al Mamun
    Alazmi, Amira Salman
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (21)
  • [49] Source characterization and human health risk assessment of nitrate in groundwater of middle Gangetic Plain, India
    Kumar, Deepak
    Singh, Anshuman
    Jha, Rishi Kumar
    Sahoo, Bibhuti Bhushan
    Sahoo, Sunil Kumar
    Jha, Vivekanand
    ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 12 (11)
  • [50] Groundwater nitrate contamination and associated human health risk assessment in southern districts of Punjab, India
    Ahada, Chetan P. S.
    Suthar, Surindra
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (25) : 25336 - 25347