Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendectomy- a systematic review

被引:3
作者
Hertz, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ,10 ]
Rattenborg, Soren [2 ,4 ]
Haug, Tora R. [5 ,6 ]
Houlind, Kim [2 ,7 ]
Konge, Lars [3 ,8 ]
Bjerrum, Flemming [3 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Kolding, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Acad Med Educ & Simulat CAMES, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark DK, Hosp Lillebaelt Vejle, Colorectal Canc Ctr South, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[5] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Surg, Herning, Denmark
[6] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Vasc Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[8] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Amager & Hvidovre, Surg Sect, Gastrounit, Hvidovre, Denmark
[10] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Sygehusvej 24, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
关键词
appendectomy; assessment; colorectal surgery; competency; education; simulation; training; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATOR; ASSESSING OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION RESEARCH; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; QUALITY INSTRUMENT; VALIDITY EVIDENCE; SURGICAL SKILLS;
D O I
10.1111/codi.16905
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AimThere is currently an increased focus on competency-based training, in which training and assessment play a crucial role. The aim of this systematic review is to create an overview of hands-on training methods and assessment tools for appendectomy and colon and rectal surgery procedures using either an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach.MethodA systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted the last search on 9 March 2023. All published papers describing hands-on training, evaluation of performance data and development of assessment tools were eligible. The quality of studies and the validity evidence of assessment tools are reported.ResultsFifty-one studies were identified. Laparoscopic assessment tools are abundant, but the literature still lacks good-quality assessment tools for open appendectomy, robotic colectomy and open rectal surgery. Overall, there is a lack of discussion regarding the establishment of pass/fail standards and the consequences of assessment. Virtual reality simulation is used more for appendectomy than colorectal procedures. Only a few of the studies investigating training were of acceptable quality. There is a need for high-quality studies in open and robotic-assisted colon surgery and all approaches to rectal surgery.ConclusionThis review provides an overview of current training methods and assessment tools and identifies where more research is needed based on the quality of the studies and the current validity evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 608
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Training and Surgical Simulation in Skull Base Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Philippe Lavigne
    Nathan Yang
    Current Otorhinolaryngology Reports, 2020, 8 : 154 - 159
  • [32] E-learning in orthopedic surgery training: A systematic review
    Tarpada, Sandip P.
    Morris, Matthew T.
    Burton, Denver A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 13 (04) : 425 - 430
  • [33] Training and qualification in gynecological minimal access surgery: A systematic review
    Torres-de la Roche, Luz Angela
    Leicher, Lasse
    Steljes, Isabell
    Eidswick, Jennifer
    Larionov, Oleg
    de Wilde, Maya Sophie
    Campo, Rudi
    Tanos, Vasilios
    De Wilde, Rudy Leon
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 : 2 - 11
  • [34] Appendectomy in the Training Program of General Surgery: Entrustable Professional Activity?
    Rossetto, Anna
    Morinelli, Vittoria
    Muschitiello, Davide
    Quattrin, Rosanna
    Terrosu, Giovanni
    Bresadola, Vittorio
    ANNALI ITALIANI DI CHIRURGIA, 2025, 96 (02) : 269 - 276
  • [35] Training, assessment and competency in gynaecologic surgery
    Hammond, I
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 20 (01) : 173 - 187
  • [36] Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma (FAST) Training: A Systematic Review
    Mohammad, Alshafi
    Hefny, Ashraf F.
    Abu-Zidan, Fikri M.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 38 (05) : 1009 - 1018
  • [37] Simulation training in vitreoretinal surgery: a systematic review
    Rasmussen, Rasmus Christian
    Grauslund, Jakob
    Vergmann, Anna Stage
    BMC OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [38] The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England: a new training paradigm
    Coleman, M. G.
    Hanna, G. B.
    Kennedy, R.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2011, 13 (06) : 614 - 616
  • [39] Validity evidence for the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program as an assessment tool: a systematic review
    Zendejas, Benjamin
    Ruparel, Raaj K.
    Cook, David A.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (02): : 512 - 520
  • [40] Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Miskovic, Danilo
    Darzi, Ara
    Athanasiou, Thanos
    Hanna, George B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 202 (04) : 469 - U161