Training and assessment for colorectal surgery and appendectomy- a systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Hertz, Peter [1 ,2 ,3 ,10 ]
Rattenborg, Soren [2 ,4 ]
Haug, Tora R. [5 ,6 ]
Houlind, Kim [2 ,7 ]
Konge, Lars [3 ,8 ]
Bjerrum, Flemming [3 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Reg Hlth Res, Kolding, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Acad Med Educ & Simulat CAMES, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Southern Denmark DK, Hosp Lillebaelt Vejle, Colorectal Canc Ctr South, Dept Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[5] Godstrup Hosp, Dept Surg, Herning, Denmark
[6] Aarhus Univ, Aarhus, Denmark
[7] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Vasc Surg, Kolding, Denmark
[8] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Clin Med, Copenhagen, Denmark
[9] Copenhagen Univ Hosp Amager & Hvidovre, Surg Sect, Gastrounit, Hvidovre, Denmark
[10] Univ Southern Denmark, Hosp Lillebaelt, Dept Surg, Sygehusvej 24, DK-6000 Kolding, Denmark
关键词
appendectomy; assessment; colorectal surgery; competency; education; simulation; training; VIRTUAL-REALITY SIMULATOR; ASSESSING OPERATIVE PERFORMANCE; MEDICAL-EDUCATION RESEARCH; RELIABILITY-ANALYSIS OCHRA; COMPETENCE ASSESSMENT; LAPAROSCOPIC COLECTOMY; LEARNING-CURVE; QUALITY INSTRUMENT; VALIDITY EVIDENCE; SURGICAL SKILLS;
D O I
10.1111/codi.16905
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AimThere is currently an increased focus on competency-based training, in which training and assessment play a crucial role. The aim of this systematic review is to create an overview of hands-on training methods and assessment tools for appendectomy and colon and rectal surgery procedures using either an open, laparoscopic or robot-assisted approach.MethodA systematic review of Medline, Embase, Cochrane and Scopus databases was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. We conducted the last search on 9 March 2023. All published papers describing hands-on training, evaluation of performance data and development of assessment tools were eligible. The quality of studies and the validity evidence of assessment tools are reported.ResultsFifty-one studies were identified. Laparoscopic assessment tools are abundant, but the literature still lacks good-quality assessment tools for open appendectomy, robotic colectomy and open rectal surgery. Overall, there is a lack of discussion regarding the establishment of pass/fail standards and the consequences of assessment. Virtual reality simulation is used more for appendectomy than colorectal procedures. Only a few of the studies investigating training were of acceptable quality. There is a need for high-quality studies in open and robotic-assisted colon surgery and all approaches to rectal surgery.ConclusionThis review provides an overview of current training methods and assessment tools and identifies where more research is needed based on the quality of the studies and the current validity evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:597 / 608
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Development, validation and implementation of a monitoring tool for training in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the English National Training Program
    Miskovic, Danilo
    Wyles, Susannah M.
    Carter, Fiona
    Coleman, Mark G.
    Hanna, George B.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (04): : 1136 - 1142
  • [22] Risk of colorectal cancer after appendectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Zhuhui
    Ma, Xinyue
    Zhu, Chunqi
    Fang, Jing-Yuan
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 38 (03) : 350 - 358
  • [23] Current status of simulation-based training tools in general surgery: A systematic review
    Shah, Salonee
    Aydin, Abdullatif
    Fisher, Rebecca
    Ahmed, Kamran
    Froghi, Saied
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY OPEN, 2022, 38
  • [24] Training and education of operating room nurses in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review
    Moller, Louise
    Olsen, Rikke Groth
    Jorgensen, Lone
    Hertz, Peter
    Petersson, Jane
    Roder, Andreas
    Konge, Lars
    Bjerrum, Flemming
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2024, : 7024 - 7036
  • [25] Current Status of Simulation-based Training Tools in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Morgan, Michael
    Aydin, Abdullatif
    Salih, Alan
    Robati, Shibby
    Ahmed, Kamran
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION, 2017, 74 (04) : 698 - 716
  • [26] Training and Surgical Simulation in Skull Base Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Lavigne, Philippe
    Yang, Nathan
    CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS, 2020, 8 (02) : 154 - 159
  • [27] Assessment Practices for Dietetics Trainees: A Systematic Review
    Jamieson, Janica
    Palermo, Claire
    Hay, Margaret
    Gibson, Simone
    JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF NUTRITION AND DIETETICS, 2019, 119 (02) : 272 - +
  • [28] E-learning in orthopedic surgery training: A systematic review
    Tarpada, Sandip P.
    Morris, Matthew T.
    Burton, Denver A.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2016, 13 (04) : 425 - 430
  • [29] Training and qualification in gynecological minimal access surgery: A systematic review
    Torres-de la Roche, Luz Angela
    Leicher, Lasse
    Steljes, Isabell
    Eidswick, Jennifer
    Larionov, Oleg
    de Wilde, Maya Sophie
    Campo, Rudi
    Tanos, Vasilios
    De Wilde, Rudy Leon
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2019, 59 : 2 - 11
  • [30] Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery
    Dowson, Henry M.
    Huang, Andy
    Soon, Yuen
    Gage, Heather
    Lovell, David P.
    Rockall, Timothy A.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (06) : 908 - 919