Accuracy of prostate cancer screening recommendations for high-risk populations on YouTube and TikTok

被引:21
作者
Abramson, Max [1 ]
Feiertag, Nathan [1 ]
Javidi, Darius [1 ]
Babar, Mustufa [1 ]
Loeb, Stacy [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Watts, Kara [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, Bronx, NY USA
[2] New York Univ Langone Hlth, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[3] New York Univ Langone Hlth, Dept Populat Hlth, New York, NY USA
[4] Manhattan Vet Affairs Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[5] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Montefiore Med Ctr, Dept Urol, 1250 Waters Pl, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
来源
BJUI COMPASS | 2023年 / 4卷 / 02期
关键词
high-risk populations; misinformation; patient education; prostate cancer screening; racial disparities; social media; TikTok; YouTube; SOCIAL MEDIA; INFORMATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; BENEFITS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1002/bco2.200
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate content quality and racial/ethnic representation, particularly of high-risk cohorts, of prostate cancer screening videos on YouTube (YT) and TikTok (TK).Materials and methods: The top 50 videos populated for the search term 'prostate cancer screening' on YT and TK that met inclusion criteria were retrieved in a cache-cleared browser. Three reviewers analysed all videos using validated criteria for the quality of consumer health information (DISCERN and Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool [PEMAT]). High quality was defined as follows: DISCERN >= 4, PEMAT understandability >= 75% and PEMAT actionability >= 75%. A 5-point Likert scale was used to demonstrate the level of misinformation compared to American Urological Association and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Perceived race and ethnicity of people in the videos were assessed by consensus approach.Results: TK videos were shorter (median 3.7 vs. 0.5 min, p < 0.001) and had more views per month (5437.5 vs. 19.3, p = 0.03) than YT videos. Perceived Black and Hispanic representation was present in 10% and 6% of YT videos and 20% and 12% of TK videos, respectively. High-risk racial/ethnic groups were explicitly discussed in 46% of YT videos and 8% of TK videos. A total of 98% of YT videos and 100% of TK videos had low- to moderate-quality consumer health information, and 88% of YT videos and 100% of TK videos had moderate to high levels of misinformation based on screening guidelines.Conclusions: YT and TK videos about prostate cancer screening are widely viewed but do not provide quality consumer health information. Black and Hispanic men remain under-represented on both platforms, and high-risk racial groups were not discussed in most videos despite the importance for screening criteria. The low understandability and actionability, significant misinformation and lack of diversity in online videos support the need for higher quality videos with adequate attention to high-risk ethnic cohorts.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 213
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Online Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Aid for At-Risk Men: A Randomized Trial [J].
Watts, Kaaren J. ;
Meiser, Bettina ;
Wakefield, Claire E. ;
Barratt, Alexandra L. ;
Howard, Kirsten ;
Cheah, Benjamin C. ;
Mann, Graham J. ;
Lobb, Elizabeth A. ;
Gaff, Clara L. ;
Patel, Manish I. .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 33 (09) :986-997
[22]   Discussing Uncertainty and Risk in Primary Care: Recommendations of a Multi-Disciplinary Panel Regarding Communication Around Prostate Cancer Screening [J].
Wilkes, Michael ;
Srinivasan, Malathi ;
Cole, Galen ;
Tardif, Richard ;
Richardson, Lisa C. ;
Plescia, Marcus .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 28 (11) :1410-1419
[23]   The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations and prostate cancer risk in the Cancer of the Prostate in Sweden (CAPS) study [J].
Moller, Elisabeth ;
Galeone, Carlotta ;
Adami, Hans-Olov ;
Adolfsson, Jan ;
Andersson, Therese M-L ;
Bellocco, Rino ;
Gronberg, Henrik ;
Mucci, Lorelei A. ;
Balter, Katarina .
PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2012, 15 (10) :1897-1908
[24]   Screening for Keratoconus in a High-Risk Adolescent Population [J].
Armstrong, Brian K. ;
Smith, Scott D. ;
Romac Coc, Ivana ;
Agarwal, Prateek ;
Mustapha, Najah ;
Navon, Samuel .
OPHTHALMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) :191-197
[25]   Development and evaluation of the screening performance of a low-cost high-risk screening strategy for breast cancer [J].
Huang, Yubei ;
Wang, Huan ;
Lyu, Zhangyan ;
Dai, Hongji ;
Liu, Peifang ;
Zhu, Ying ;
Song, Fengju ;
Chen, Kexin .
CANCER BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2022, 19 (09) :1375-1384
[26]   Alarming trends and disparities in high-risk endometrial cancer [J].
Eakin, Cortney M. ;
Lai, Tiffany ;
Cohen, Joshua G. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 35 (01) :15-20
[27]   The Effectiveness of Shared Compared to Informed Decision Making for Prostate Cancer Screening in a High-Risk African American Population: A Randomized Control Trial [J].
Carlson, Daniel S. ;
Grivas, Petros ;
Wei, Wei ;
Dhillon, Puneet K. ;
Abraksia, Samir .
CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2021, 39 (02) :124-132
[28]   Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for HIV, Hepatitis B, and Syphilis in Populations with High-risk Behaviors in Croatia [J].
Vilibic-Cavlek, Tatjana ;
Kolaric, Branko ;
Pavlic, Jasmina ;
Kosanovic-Licina, Mirjana Lana ;
Nemeth-Blazic, Tatjana .
ACTA DERMATOVENEROLOGICA CROATICA, 2018, 26 (04) :314-320
[29]   Benefits and harms of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk populations: systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Yang, Jichun ;
Yang, Zhirong ;
Zeng, Xueyang ;
Yu, Shuqing ;
Gao, Le ;
Jiang, Yu ;
Sun, Feng .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER CENTER, 2023, 3 (03) :175-185
[30]   Contemporary seminal vesicle invasion rates in NCCN high-risk prostate cancer patients [J].
Flammia, Rocco S. ;
Hoeh, Benedikt ;
Sorce, Gabriele ;
Chierigo, Francesco ;
Hohenhorst, Lukas ;
Tian, Zhen ;
Goyal, Jordan A. ;
Leonardo, Costantino ;
Briganti, Alberto ;
Graefen, Markus ;
Terrone, Carlo ;
Saad, Fred ;
Shariat, Shahrokh F. ;
Montorsi, Francesco ;
Chun, Felix K. H. ;
Gallucci, Michele ;
Karakiewicz, Pierre, I .
PROSTATE, 2022, 82 (10) :1051-1059