Effect of relative humidity on the thin-layer chromatographic separation of E 472 emulsifiers

被引:0
作者
Schuster, Katharina [1 ]
Oellig, Claudia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Food Chem, Dept Food Chem & Analyt Chem 170a, Garbenstr 28, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
High-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC); Food emulsifiers; E; 472; Relative humidity (RH);
D O I
10.1007/s00764-023-00260-1
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
E 472 emulsifiers are organic acid esters of mono- and diacylglycerides. These emulsifiers are categorized into six subgroups (E 472a-f) based on the specific acid component, e.g., acetic acid, lactic acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, or mixtures of tartaric and acetic acid. The present study investigated the effect of relative humidity (RH) on the thin-layer chromatographic separation of four E 472 emulsifier subgroups, addressing practical concerns due to RH variations between seasons and within laboratories. Three RH-setting techniques affecting plate activity and chamber climate were assessed using saturated salt and aqueous sulfuric acid solutions. Aqueous sulfuric acid solutions for RH adjustment resulted in decreased hRF values, while no trends in hRF value changes were observed for saturated salt solutions. Unlike RH itself, the RH setting technique led to substantial changes in the chromatographic fingerprint. Thus, the choice of the RH setting method should be tailored to the specific analyte and analysis goal. Despite variations in chromatographic fingerprints between the three RH setting techniques, the fingerprint remained consistent within the same technique across the tested RH range.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 334
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   Robustness in qualitative analysis:: a practical approach [J].
Aguilera, E. ;
Lucena, R. ;
Cardenas, S. ;
Valcarcel, M. ;
Trullols, E. ;
Ruisanchez, I. .
TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 25 (06) :621-627
[2]   Effect of chamber gas phase on mobile phase pH and on separation efficiency in TLC. A new mode of chromatography [J].
Berezkin, V. G. ;
Sumina, E. G. ;
Shtykov, S. N. ;
Atayan, V. Z. ;
Zagniboroda, D. A. ;
Nekhoroshev, G. A. .
CHROMATOGRAPHIA, 2006, 64 (1-2) :105-108
[3]  
Borman P., 2018, ICH Qual. Guidel, VFirst, P127, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781118971147.CH5
[4]  
Commission EU, 2012, COMM REG EU NO 231 2, V55, P1
[5]   INFLUENCE OF HUMIDITY VARIATIONS IN THIN-LAYER CHROMATOGRAPHY OF HYPNOTICS [J].
DEZEEUW, RA .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1968, 33 (01) :227-&
[6]  
European Food Emulsifiers Manufacturers Association, 2019, EFEMA INDEX FOOD EMU
[7]  
European Parliament and the Council of the European Union, 2008, Regulation (EC) no 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the council of 16 December 2998 on food additives, V354, P16
[8]   HUMIDITY FIXED-POINTS OF BINARY SATURATED AQUEOUS-SOLUTIONS [J].
GREENSPAN, L .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH OF THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS SECTION A-PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 1977, 81 (01) :89-96
[9]  
Norn V, 2015, EMULSIFIERS IN FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 2ND EDITION, P1
[10]   Characterization of E 472 food emulsifiers - determination of bound and free fruit acids, free glycerol and ash content [J].
Oellig, Claudia ;
Link, Katharina ;
Schwack, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2020, 1619