Prior knowledge based deep learning auto-segmentation in magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer

被引:6
作者
Kawula, Maria [1 ]
Vagni, Marica [2 ]
Cusumano, Davide [2 ,3 ]
Boldrini, Luca [2 ]
Placidi, Lorenzo [2 ]
Corradini, Stefanie [1 ]
Belka, Claus [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Landry, Guillaume [1 ]
Kurz, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, LMU Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Munich, Germany
[2] Fdn Policlin Univ Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
[3] Mater Olbia Hosp, Olbia, SS, Italy
[4] Partnership DKFZ & LMU Univ Hosp Munich, German Canc Consortium DKTK, Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
[5] Bavarian Canc Res Ctr BZKF, Munich, Germany
来源
PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 28卷
关键词
Auto-segmentation; Patient-specific models; Spatial transformer layer; Deep learning; MRgRT; MR-Linac; Prostate cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.phro.2023.100498
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Automation is desirable for organ segmentation in radiotherapy. This study compared deep learning methods for auto-segmentation of organs-at-risk (OARs) and clinical target volume (CTV) in prostate cancer patients undergoing fractionated magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiation therapy. Models predicting dense displacement fields (DDFMs) between planning and fraction images were compared to patient-specific (PSM) and baseline (BM) segmentation models. Materials and methods: A dataset of 92 patients with planning and fraction MR images (MRIs) from two institutions were used. DDFMs were trained to predict dense displacement fields (DDFs) between the planning and fraction images, which were subsequently used to propagate the planning contours of the bladder, rectum, and CTV to the daily MRI. The training was performed either with true planning-fraction image pairs or with planning images and their counterparts deformed by known DDFs. The BMs were trained on 53 planning images, while to generate PSMs, the BMs were fine-tuned using the planning image of a given single patient. The evaluation included Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), the average (HDavg) and the 95th percentile (HD95) Hausdorff distance (HD). Results: The DDFMs with DSCs for bladder/rectum of 0.76/0.76 performed worse than PSMs (0.91/0.90) and BMs (0.89/0.88). The same trend was observed for HDs. For CTV, DDFM and PSM performed similarly yielding DSCs of 0.87 and 0.84, respectively. Conclusions: DDFMs were found suitable for CTV delineation after rigid alignment. However, for OARs they were outperformed by PSMs, as they predicted only limited deformations even in the presence of substantial anatomical changes.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] A Prospective Single-Arm Phase 2 Study of Stereotactic Magnetic Resonance Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Early Toxicity Results
    Bruynzeel, Anna M. E.
    Tetar, Shyama U.
    Oei, Swie S.
    Senan, Suresh
    Haasbeek, Cornelis J. A.
    Spoelstra, Femke O. B.
    Piet, Anna H. M.
    Meijnen, Philip
    van der Jagt, Marjolein A. B. Bakker
    Fraikin, Tamara
    Slotman, Berend J.
    van Moorselaar, Reindert J. A.
    Lagerwaard, Frank J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 105 (05): : 1086 - 1094
  • [2] Clinical implementation of deep learning contour autosegmentation for prostate radiotherapy
    Cha, Elaine
    Elguindi, Sharif
    Onochie, Ifeanyirochukwu
    Gorovets, Daniel
    Deasy, Joseph O.
    Zelefsky, Michael
    Gillespie, Erin F.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 159 : 1 - 7
  • [3] TransMorph: Transformer for unsupervised medical image registration
    Chen, Junyu
    Frey, Eric C.
    He, Yufan
    Segars, William P.
    Li, Ye
    Du, Yong
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2022, 82
  • [4] Reducing inter-observer variability and interaction time of MR liver volumetry by combining automatic CNN-based liver segmentation and manual corrections
    Chlebus, Grzegorz
    Meine, Hans
    Thoduka, Smita
    Abolmaali, Nasreddin
    van Ginneken, Bram
    Hahn, Horst Karl
    Schenk, Andrea
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (05):
  • [5] MR-guidance in clinical reality: current treatment challenges and future perspectives
    Corradini, S.
    Alongi, F.
    Andratschke, N.
    Belka, C.
    Boldrini, L.
    Cellini, F.
    Debus, J.
    Guckenberger, M.
    Hoerner-Rieber, J.
    Lagerwaard, F. J.
    Mazzola, R.
    Palacios, M. A.
    Philippens, M. E. P.
    Raaijmakers, C. P. J.
    Terhaard, C. H. J.
    Valentini, V.
    Niyazi, M.
    [J]. RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (1)
  • [6] Fast contour propagation for MR-guided prostate radiotherapy using convolutional neural networks
    Eppenhof, K. A. J.
    Maspero, M.
    Savenije, M. H. F.
    de Boer, J. C. J.
    van Zyp, J. R. N. van der Voort
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    Raaijmakers, A. J. E.
    Veta, M.
    van den Berg, C. A. T.
    Pluim, J. P. W.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (03) : 1238 - 1248
  • [7] Progressively Trained Convolutional Neural Networks for Deformable Image Registration
    Eppenhof, Koen A. J.
    Lafarge, Maxime W.
    Veta, Mitko
    Pluim, Josien P. W.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2020, 39 (05) : 1594 - 1604
  • [8] Role of On-Table Plan Adaptation in MR-Guided Ablative Radiation Therapy for Central Lung Tumors
    Finazzi, Tobias
    Palacios, Miguel A.
    Spoelstra, Femke O. B.
    Haasbeek, Cornelis J. A.
    Bruynzeel, Anna M. E.
    Slotman, Ben J.
    Lagerwaard, Frank J.
    Senan, Suresh
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 104 (04): : 933 - 941
  • [9] Patient specific deep learning based segmentation for magnetic resonance guided prostate radiotherapy
    Fransson, Samuel
    Tilly, David
    Strand, Robin
    [J]. PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 23 : 38 - 42
  • [10] A novel MRI segmentation method using CNN-based correction network for MRI-guided adaptive radiotherapy
    Fu, Yabo
    Mazur, Thomas R.
    Wu, Xue
    Liu, Shi
    Chang, Xiao
    Lu, Yonggang
    Li, H. Harold
    Kim, Hyun
    Roach, Michael C.
    Henke, Lauren
    Yang, Deshan
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (11) : 5129 - 5137