Fecal microbiota transplant delivered via invasive routes in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:7
作者
Mohan, Babu P. [1 ,2 ]
Loganathan, Priyadarshini [3 ]
Khan, Shahab R. [4 ]
Garg, Gauri [1 ,2 ]
Muthusamy, Arunkumar [5 ]
Ponnada, Suresh [6 ]
Pasam, Ravi Teja [7 ]
Chandan, Saurabh [8 ]
Tuteja, Ashok [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, 30 N 1900 SOM 4R118, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[2] Univ Utah Hlth, Sch Med, 30 N 1900 SOM 4R118, Salt Lake City, UT 84132 USA
[3] UT Hlth, Internal Med, San Antonio, TX USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[5] MNGI Digest Hlth, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Minnesota, MA USA
[6] Caril Roanoke Med Ctr, Internal Med, Roanoke, VA USA
[7] Wentworth Provincial Hosp, Internal Med, Dover, NH USA
[8] CHI Creighton Sch Med, Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Omaha, NE USA
关键词
Bloating; Colonoscopy; Constipation; Diarrhea; FMT; IBS; Meta-analysis; ROME criteria; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1007/s12664-023-01373-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and AimsIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) results in significant loss of quality of life. Management guidelines do not recommend fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) for IBS based on weak evidence as refined data is lacking. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to ascertain the pooled clinical outcomes of FMT in IBS, delivered via invasive routes.MethodsMultiple databases were searched through January 2023 to identify studies that reported on FMT treatment in IBS by invasive routes. Standard meta-analysis methodology using the random-effects model was used. Heterogeneity was assessed by I-2% and 95% predication interval.ResultsFive studies were included. As many as 377 IBS patients were assessed, of which 238 received FMT and 139 received placebo. One study used nasojejunal tubes, one esophagogastroduodenoscopy and three colonoscopy for FMT delivery. FMT via colonoscopy was performed as a one-time procedure instilled into the cecum. Two studies used 30 g of stool from a single universal donor and one study used 50-80 g of pooled donor feces. The pooled odds ratio of improvement in IBS symptoms with FMT was significantly better as compared to that of placebo OR = 2.9 (95% CI [1.6-5.2, I-2 = 62%, p < 0.001]). This was true for studies that exclusively used colonoscopy (OR = 2.1 [1.1-4.2, p = 0.04]). In the FMT arm, 10 patients (10.6%) reported abdomen pain and worsening of symptoms with bloating and six patients (6.3%) reported diarrhea.ConclusionFMT delivered via invasive routes, especially colonoscopy, demonstrated significant improvement in IBS symptoms. A single FMT consisting of 30 g or more of single universal donor feces instilled into the cecum is the predominant modality.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 323
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fecal microbiota transplant delivered via invasive routes in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Babu P. Mohan
    Priyadarshini Loganathan
    Shahab R. Khan
    Gauri Garg
    Arunkumar Muthusamy
    Suresh Ponnada
    Ravi Teja Pasam
    Saurabh Chandan
    Ashok Tuteja
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2023, 42 : 315 - 323
  • [2] Fecal microbiota transplantation for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Mancai
    Xie, Xiaofeng
    Zhao, Songbo
    Ma, Xiaojuan
    Wang, Zheyuan
    Zhang, Youcheng
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [3] Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Jamshidi, Parnian
    Farsi, Yeganeh
    Nariman, Zahra
    Hatamnejad, Mohammad Reza
    Mohammadzadeh, Benyamin
    Akbarialiabad, Hossein
    Nasiri, Mohammad Javad
    Sechi, Leonardo A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2023, 24 (19)
  • [4] Fecal microbiota transplantation in irritable bowel syndrome: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Samuthpongtorn, Chatpol
    Kantagowit, Piyawat
    Pittayanon, Rapat
    Patcharatrakul, Tanisa
    Gonlachanvit, Sutep
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [5] Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wu, Jie
    Lv, Liang
    Wang, Chunlian
    FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [6] Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhao, Hui-jun
    Zhang, Xiao-jing
    Zhang, Na-na
    Yan, Bin
    Xu, Ke-ke
    Peng, Li-hua
    Pan, Fei
    FRONTIERS IN NUTRITION, 2022, 9
  • [7] A systematic review, pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials exploring the role of fecal microbiota transplantation in irritable bowel syndrome
    Rokkas, Theodore
    Hold, Georgina L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2023, 35 (04) : 471 - 479
  • [8] Fecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Halkjaer, Sofie Ingdam
    Lo, Bobby
    Cold, Frederik
    Christensen, Alice Hojer
    Holster, Savanne
    Konig, Julia
    Brummer, Robert Jan
    Aroniadis, Olga C.
    Lahtinen, Perttu
    Holvoet, Tom
    Gluud, Lise Lotte
    Petersen, Andreas Munk
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 29 (20) : 3185 - 3202
  • [9] Fecal microbiota transplantation in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Myneedu, Kanchana
    Deoker, Abhizith
    Schmulson, Max J.
    Bashashati, Mohammad
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 7 (08) : 1033 - 1041
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplant in irritable bowel syndrome: An update based on meta-analysis of randomized control trials
    Abdelghafar, Yomna Ali
    AbdelQadir, Yossef Hassan
    Motawea, Karam R.
    Nasr, Sara Amr
    Omran, Hoda Aly Mohamed
    Belal, Mohamed Mohamed
    Elhashash, Mohamed Mahdy
    AbdelAzim, Ahmed Alaa
    Shah, Jaffer
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2022, 5 (05)