A composite index for assessing accessibility in urban areas: A case study in Central Athens, Greece

被引:20
作者
Mitropoulos, Lambros [1 ]
Karolemeas, Christos [1 ]
Tsigdinos, Stefanos [1 ]
Vassi, Avgi [1 ]
Bakogiannis, Efthimios [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tech Univ Athens, Sch Rural Surveying & Geoinformat Engn, 9 Iroon Polytechneiou Str, Athens 15780, Greece
关键词
Accessibility index; Opportunities; Infrastructure assessment; User-centric accessibility; Transport geography; PUBLIC TRANSPORT ACCESSIBILITY; SOCIAL INEQUALITIES; MODE-CHOICE; WALKABILITY; WALKING; EQUITY; QUALITY; ACCESS; IMPACT; CITIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2023.103566
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Effective transportation planning necessitates the consideration of all road network users and their needs. To-wards this goal, the integration of accessibility in planning and the development of tools that enable the assessment and measurement of accessibility within urban areas becomes essential. This study aims to contribute to the accessibility assessment process of urban areas by developing two accessibility indices: the infrastructure and the opportunity accessibility index, which use an infrastructure-based and distance-based approach, respectively. Four types of users and their needs are considered: pedestrians, People with Disabilities (PWD), cyclists and public transport users. Data for modeling the accessibility indices are collected by: 1) an infra-structure audit, 2) a user survey, and 3) geographic information systems. The proposed method is applied in a district in central Athens, Greece, which is characterized by high population density and high level of activities. The Infrastructure Accessibility Index (IAI) measures accessibility for sidewalks, crosswalks, bikeways and public transport stops. The IAI results indicate moderate accessibility levels for pedestrians and PWD, for sidewalks and crosswalks. The Opportunity Accessibility Index (OAI) measures the share of different types of users that reach different opportunities within a time threshold. The accepted time threshold per user type is estimated based on the survey responds, for seven different opportunities: green spaces, recreational spaces, education buildings, health buildings, public service building, commercial uses and public transport stops. Compared to the IAI, the majority of users reach different opportunities within the estimated time threshold. The study concludes with recommendations to improve accessibility levels at local level.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]   Mapping public transport accessibility levels (PTAL) in India and its applications: A case study of Surat [J].
Adhvaryu, Bhargav ;
Chopde, Abhay ;
Dashora, Lalit .
CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2019, 7 (02) :293-300
[2]  
Allen D., 2007, INT C WALK LIV COMM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Final Report. FHWA-RD-98-072,
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Unsustainable transport: City transport in the new century, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203003886
[5]  
Barman J., 2010, Institute of Town Planners, India Journal, V7, P64
[6]  
Bartzokas-Tsiompras A., 2020, European Journal of Geography, V11, P163, DOI [10.48088/ejg.a.bar.11.1.163.187, DOI 10.48088/EJG.A.BAR.11.1.163.187]
[7]  
Ben-Akiva M., 2018, DISCRETE CHOICE ANAL
[8]   Sustainable accessibility: a conceptual framework to integrate transport and land use plan-making. Two test-applications in the Netherlands and a reflection on the way forward [J].
Bertolini, L ;
le Clercq, F ;
Kapoen, L .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2005, 12 (03) :207-220
[9]   Determining optimal deployment of electric vehicles charging stations: Case of Tunis City, Tunisia [J].
Bouguerra, Seifeddine ;
Layeb, Safa Bhar .
CASE STUDIES ON TRANSPORT POLICY, 2019, 7 (03) :628-642
[10]  
Burruss G.W., 2021, ENCY RES METHODS CRI, VI