Why Is Climate Sensitivity for Solar Forcing Smaller than for an Equivalent CO2 Forcing?

被引:5
作者
Kaur, Harpreet [1 ]
Bala, Govindasamy [1 ]
Seshadri, Ashwin K. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci, Ctr Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Bangalore, India
[2] Indian Inst Sci, Divecha Ctr Climate Change, Bangalore, India
关键词
Climate change; Climate sensitivity; Radiative fluxes; Radiative forcing; Climate models; General circulation models; SURFACE-TEMPERATURE-CHANGE; RADIATIVE KERNEL TECHNIQUE; LOW-CLOUD COVER; FEEDBACK PROCESSES; TROPOSPHERIC ADJUSTMENT; IRRADIANCE REDUCTION; EVOLVING PATTERNS; GLOBAL CLOUD; WATER-VAPOR; LAPSE-RATE;
D O I
10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0980.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Previous studies have shown that climate sensitivity, defined as the global mean surface temperature change per unit radiative forcing, is smaller for solar radiative forcing compared to an equivalent CO2 radiative forcing. We investigate the causes for this difference using the NCAR CAM4 model. The contributions to the climate feedback parameter, which is inversely related to climate sensitivity, are estimated for water vapor, lapse rate, Planck, albedo, and cloud feedbacks using the radiative kernel technique. The total feedback estimated for CO2 and solar radiative forcing from our model simulations is -1.23 and -1.45 W m(-2) K-1, respectively. We find that the difference in feedback between the two cases is primarily due to differences in lapse rate, water vapor, and cloud feedbacks, which together explain 65% of the difference in total feedback. The rest comes from Planck and albedo feedbacks. The differences in feedbacks arise mainly from differences in the horizontal (meridional) structure of forcing and the consequent warming. Our study provides important insights into the effects of the meridional structure of forcing on climate feedback, which is important for evaluating global climate change from different forcing agents. Significance StatementAn increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration or an increase in incoming solar radiation leads to a rise in the radiative budget and consequent climate warming, which is amplified by the presence of multiple climate feedbacks. These feedbacks, from changes in surface albedo, combined effect of water vapor and the vertical lapse rate of temperature, and changes in clouds, differ between solar and CO2 forcing. Using radiative kernels, this study quantifies these individual feedbacks for an equivalent radiative change caused by an increase in CO2 or incoming solar radiation, showing how the differences arise from differences in the meridional patterns of warming. In agreement with prior studies, these differences can explain the smaller efficacy of solar forcing compared to CO2 forcing.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 789
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Resilience of Amazon rainfall to CO2 removal forcing [J].
Zhang, Suqin ;
Qu, Xia ;
Huang, Gang ;
Hu, Peng ;
Yang, Xianke ;
Wang, Ya ;
Wu, Liang .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (01)
[32]   Why is the climate forcing of sulfate aerosols so uncertain? [J].
Hu, RM ;
Planton, S ;
Déque, M ;
Marquet, P ;
Braun, A .
ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2001, 18 (06) :1103-1120
[33]   Why Is the Climate Forcing of Sulfate Aerosols So Uncertain? [J].
Hu Rongming .
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2001, (06) :1103-1120
[34]   Why is the climate forcing of sulfate aerosols so uncertain? [J].
Hu Rongming ;
Serge Planton ;
Michel Déque ;
Pascal Marquet ;
Alain Braun .
Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2001, 18 (6) :1103-1120
[35]   Non-Monotonic Feedback Dependence Under Abrupt CO2 Forcing Due To a North Atlantic Pattern Effect [J].
Mitevski, Ivan ;
Dong, Yue ;
Polvani, Lorenzo M. ;
Rugenstein, Maria ;
Orbe, Clara .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 50 (14)
[36]   Climate Sensitivity and Feedbacks of BCC-CSM to Idealized CO2 Forcing from CMIP5 to CMIP6 [J].
Xueli Shi ;
Xiaolong Chen ;
Yunwei Dai ;
Guoquan Hu .
Journal of Meteorological Research, 2020, 34 :865-878
[37]   Direct weakening of tropical circulations from masked CO2 radiative forcing [J].
Merlis, Timothy M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (43) :13167-13171
[38]   Understanding the Rapid Precipitation Response to CO2 and Aerosol Forcing on a Regional Scale [J].
Richardson, Thomas B. ;
Forster, Piers M. ;
Andrews, Timothy ;
Parker, Doug J. .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2016, 29 (02) :583-594
[39]   An Analytical Model for Spatially Varying Clear-Sky CO2 Forcing [J].
Jeevanjee, Nadir ;
Seeley, Jacob T. ;
Paynter, David ;
Fueglistaler, Stephan .
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (23) :9463-9480
[40]   On the response of the climate system to solar forcing - Introductory paper [J].
Bengtsson, L. .
SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2006, 125 (1-4) :187-197