Applications of artificial intelligence in the analysis of dental panoramic radiographs: an overview of systematic reviews

被引:11
作者
Turosz, Natalia [1 ]
Checinska, Kamila [2 ]
Checinski, Maciej [3 ]
Brzozowska, Anita [4 ]
Nowak, Zuzanna [5 ]
Sikora, Maciej [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Jagiellonian Univ Med Coll, Inst Publ Hlth, Skawinska, Poland
[2] AGH Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Mat Sci & Ceram, Dept Glass Technol & Amorphous Coatings, Mickiewicza, Poland
[3] Prevent Med Ctr, Dept Oral Surg, Komorowskiego, Poland
[4] Prevent Med Ctr, PL-30106 Komorowskiego, Poland
[5] Med Univ Silesia, Dept Temporomandibular Disorders, Katowice, Poland
[6] Hosp Minist Interior, Dept Maxillofacial Surg, Wojska Polskiego, Poland
[7] Pomeranian Med Univ, Dept Biochem & Med Chem, Powstancow Wielkopolskich, Poland
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Deep learning; Dental radiography; Panoramic radiographs; Overview of reviews; CARIES DETECTION; DENTISTRY;
D O I
10.1259/dmfr.20230284
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: This overview of systematic reviews aimed to establish the current state of knowl-edge on the suitability of artificial intelligence (AI) in dental panoramic radiograph analysis and illustrate its changes over time. Methods: Medical databases covered by the Association for Computing Machinery, Biele-feld Academic Search Engine, Google Scholar, and PubMed engines were searched. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBIS tool. Ultimately, 12 articles were qualified for the qualitative synthesis. The results were visualized with timelines, tables, and charts. Results: In the years 1988-2023, a significant development of information technologies for the analysis of DPRs was observed. The latest analyzed AI models achieve high accuracy in detecting caries (91.5%), osteoporosis (89.29%), maxillary sinusitis (87.5%), periodontal bone loss (93.09%), and teeth identification and numbering (93.67%). The detection of periapical lesions is also characterized by high sensitivity (99.95%) and specificity (92%). However, due to the small number of heterogeneous source studies synthesized in systematic reviews, the results of this overview should be interpreted with caution. Conclusion: Currently, AI applications can significantly support dentists in dental pano-ramic radiograph analysis. As systematic reviews on AI become outdated quickly, their regular updating is recommended. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023416048. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2023) 52, 20230284. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230284
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] ACM, The ACM Guide to Computing Literature
  • [2] Temporomandibular Joint Disk Displacements in Class II Malocclusion and Cervical Spine Alterations: Systematic Review and Report of a Hypodivergent Case with MRI Bone and Soft Tissue Changes
    Almasan, Oana
    Kui, Andreea
    Duncea, Ioana
    Manea, Avram
    Buduru, Smaranda
    [J]. LIFE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [3] AlmeidaGoncalves M, Emerging Trends in Oral Health Sciences and Dentistry
  • [4] Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes and Study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews
    Amir-Behghadami, Mehrdad
    Janati, Ali
    [J]. EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2020, 37 (06) : 387 - 387
  • [5] [Anonymous], SENSITIVITY SPECIFIC
  • [6] [Anonymous], What is artificial intelligence (AI)?
  • [7] [Anonymous], Bristol U of ROBIS tool
  • [8] BASE, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine | What is BASE?
  • [9] Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study
    Bramer, Wichor M.
    Rethlefsen, Melissa L.
    Kleijnen, Jos
    Franco, Oscar H.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [10] Brownlee J, 2019, Impact of Dataset Size on Deep Learning Model Skill And Performance Estimates