Evaluation of Three Serological Tests for Diagnosis of Canine Brucellosis

被引:5
作者
Perletta, Fabrizia [1 ]
Di Pancrazio, Chiara [1 ]
Rodomonti, Diamante [1 ]
Di Febo, Tiziana [1 ]
Luciani, Mirella [1 ]
Krasteva, Ivanka Marinova [1 ]
Maggetti, Marta [1 ]
Profeta, Francesca [1 ]
Salini, Romolo [1 ]
De Massis, Fabrizio [1 ]
Sacchini, Flavio [1 ]
Tittarelli, Manuela [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Abruzzo & Molise, I-64100 Teramo, Italy
关键词
Brucella canis; diagnosis; serological methods; AGGLUTINATION-TEST; LABORATORY EXPOSURES; INFECTION; DOGS; ANTIBODIES; OUTBREAK; ANTIGEN; SMOOTH; KENNEL; PCR;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms11092162
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Canine brucellosis caused by Brucella canis, is an infectious disease affecting dogs and wild Canidae. Clinical diagnosis is challenging, and laboratory testing is crucial for a definitive diagnosis. Various serological methods have been described, but their accuracy is uncertain due to limited validation studies. The present study aimed to evaluate the performances of three serological tests for the diagnosis of B. canis in comparison with bacterial isolation (gold standard), in order to establish a protocol for the serological diagnosis of canine brucellosis. A panel of sera from naturally infected dogs (n = 61), from which B. canis was isolated, and uninfected dogs (n = 143), negative for B. canis isolation, were tested using microplate serum agglutination (mSAT), complement fixation performed using the Brucella ovis antigen (B. ovis-CFT), and a commercial immunofluorescence assay (IFAT). The sensitivity and specificity of the three serological methods were, respectively, the following: 96.7% (95% CI 88.8-98.7%) and 92.3 (95% CI 86.7-95.1%) for mSAT; 96.7% (95% CI 88.8-98.7%) and 96.5 (95% CI 92.1-98.2%) for B. ovis-CFT; 98.4% (95% CI 91.3-99.4%) and 99.3 (95% CI 96.2-99.8%) for IFAT. The use in of the three methods in parallel, combined with bacterial isolation and molecular methods, could improve the diagnosis of the infection in dogs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]  
SAEGUSA J, 1977, JPN J VET SCI, V39, P181
[42]   Canine Brucellosis: An Update [J].
Santos, Renato L. ;
Souza, Tayse D. ;
Mol, Juliana P. S. ;
Eckstein, Camila ;
Paixao, Tatiane A. .
FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8
[43]  
Sayan M, 2011, JPN J INFECT DIS, V64, P516
[44]   The first-time isolation of Brucella canis from two aborted bitches in a kennel in Turkey [J].
Saytekin, Ahmet Murat ;
Karagul, Mustafa Sencer ;
Eroglu, Buket ;
Yildiz Oz, Gulseren ;
Mecitoglu, Gulnaz Yilmazbas ;
Yilmaz, Ozge .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2018, 42 (06) :665-668
[45]  
Schoonjans F, 1996, CLIN CHEM, V42, P986
[46]  
Sivia D.S, 2006, DATA ANAL BAYESIAN T, V2nd
[47]   Primary and memory immune responses against rough Brucella canis are less robust compared to smooth B. abortus and B. melitensis following intratracheal infection in mice [J].
Stranahan, Lauren W. ;
Garcia-Gonzalez, Daniel G. ;
Hensel, Martha E. ;
Arenas-Gamboa, Angela M. .
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 13
[48]   SEROLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR THE PRESENCE OF BRUCELLA CANIS INFECTION IN DOGS IN BRITAIN [J].
TAYLOR, DJ .
VETERINARY RECORD, 1980, 106 (05) :102-104
[49]   Transboundary Spread of Brucella canis through Import of Infected Dogs, the Netherlands , November 2016-December 2018 [J].
van Dijk, Marloes A. M. ;
Engelsma, Marc Y. ;
Visser, Vanessa X. N. ;
Keur, Ingrid ;
Holtslag, Marjolijn E. ;
Willems, Nicole ;
Meij, Bjorn P. ;
Willemsen, Peter T. J. ;
Wagenaar, Jaap A. ;
Roest, Hendrik I. J. ;
Broens, Els M. .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 27 (07) :1783-1788
[50]  
von Kruedener R B, 1976, Dev Biol Stand, V31, P251