Evaluation of Three Serological Tests for Diagnosis of Canine Brucellosis

被引:5
作者
Perletta, Fabrizia [1 ]
Di Pancrazio, Chiara [1 ]
Rodomonti, Diamante [1 ]
Di Febo, Tiziana [1 ]
Luciani, Mirella [1 ]
Krasteva, Ivanka Marinova [1 ]
Maggetti, Marta [1 ]
Profeta, Francesca [1 ]
Salini, Romolo [1 ]
De Massis, Fabrizio [1 ]
Sacchini, Flavio [1 ]
Tittarelli, Manuela [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Zooprofilatt Sperimentale Abruzzo & Molise, I-64100 Teramo, Italy
关键词
Brucella canis; diagnosis; serological methods; AGGLUTINATION-TEST; LABORATORY EXPOSURES; INFECTION; DOGS; ANTIBODIES; OUTBREAK; ANTIGEN; SMOOTH; KENNEL; PCR;
D O I
10.3390/microorganisms11092162
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Canine brucellosis caused by Brucella canis, is an infectious disease affecting dogs and wild Canidae. Clinical diagnosis is challenging, and laboratory testing is crucial for a definitive diagnosis. Various serological methods have been described, but their accuracy is uncertain due to limited validation studies. The present study aimed to evaluate the performances of three serological tests for the diagnosis of B. canis in comparison with bacterial isolation (gold standard), in order to establish a protocol for the serological diagnosis of canine brucellosis. A panel of sera from naturally infected dogs (n = 61), from which B. canis was isolated, and uninfected dogs (n = 143), negative for B. canis isolation, were tested using microplate serum agglutination (mSAT), complement fixation performed using the Brucella ovis antigen (B. ovis-CFT), and a commercial immunofluorescence assay (IFAT). The sensitivity and specificity of the three serological methods were, respectively, the following: 96.7% (95% CI 88.8-98.7%) and 92.3 (95% CI 86.7-95.1%) for mSAT; 96.7% (95% CI 88.8-98.7%) and 96.5 (95% CI 92.1-98.2%) for B. ovis-CFT; 98.4% (95% CI 91.3-99.4%) and 99.3 (95% CI 96.2-99.8%) for IFAT. The use in of the three methods in parallel, combined with bacterial isolation and molecular methods, could improve the diagnosis of the infection in dogs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   Laboratory Exposures from an Unsuspected Case of Human Infection with Brucella canis [J].
Ahmed-Bentley, Jasmine ;
Roman, Susan ;
Mirzanejad, Yazdan ;
Fraser, Erin ;
Hoang, Linda ;
Young, Edward J. ;
Morshed, Muhammad ;
Deans, Gregory .
EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 27 (09) :2489-2491
[2]  
Alton G.G., 1988, Techniques for the Brucellosis Laboratory, P169
[3]  
Alton G.G., 1988, Techniques for the Brucellosis Laboratory, P17
[4]   PET TRAVEL Second UK isolation of Brucella canis [J].
Whatmore, Adrian M. ;
Perrett, Lorraine ;
Friggens, Martin .
VETERINARY RECORD, 2017, 180 (25)
[5]   COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF MICROAGGLUTINATION TEST AND SERUM AGGLUTINATION-TEST AS SUPPLEMENTARY DIAGNOSTIC METHODS FOR BRUCELLOSIS [J].
BAUM, M ;
ZAMIR, O ;
BERGMANRIOS, R ;
KATZ, E ;
BEIDER, Z ;
COHEN, A ;
BANAI, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (08) :2166-2170
[6]  
Bolotin V.I., 2020, J. Vet. Med. Biotechnol. Biosaf, V6, P5, DOI [10.36016/JVMBBS-2020-6-4-1, DOI 10.36016/JVMBBS-2020-6-4-1]
[7]   Canine Brucellosis: Insights Into the Epidemiologic Situation in Europe [J].
Buhmann, Gesine ;
Paul, Frauke ;
Herbst, Werner ;
Melzer, Falk ;
Wolf, Georg ;
Hartmann, Katrin ;
Fischer, Andrea .
FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2019, 6
[8]  
Carmichael L. E., 1990, Animal brucellosis., P335
[9]  
CARMICHAEL LE, 1984, DEV BIOLOGICALS, V56, P371
[10]   Brucella canis Is an Intracellular Pathogen That Induces a Lower Proinflammatory Response than Smooth Zoonotic Counterparts [J].
Chacon-Diaz, Carlos ;
Altamirano-Silva, Pamela ;
Gonzalez-Espinoza, Gabriela ;
Medina, Maria-Concepcion ;
Alfaro-Alarcon, Alejandro ;
Bouza-Mora, Laura ;
Jimenez-Rojas, Cesar ;
Wong, Melissa ;
Barquero-Calvo, Elias ;
Rojas, Norman ;
Guzman-Verri, Caterina ;
Moreno, Edgardo ;
Chaves-Olarte, Esteban .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 2015, 83 (12) :4861-4870