Walking the Walk of AI Ethics: Organizational Challenges and the Individualization of Risk among Ethics Entrepreneurs

被引:12
作者
Ali, Sanna J. [1 ]
Christin, Angele [1 ]
Smart, Andrew [2 ]
Katila, Riitta [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Google Res, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2023 | 2023年
关键词
AI ethics; responsible AI; neo-institutionalism; Science and Technology Studies; organizations; decoupling; institutional change; INSTITUTIONAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP;
D O I
10.1145/3593013.3593990
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Amidst decline in public trust in technology, computing ethics have taken center stage, and critics have raised questions about corporate "ethics washing." Yet few studies examine the actual implementation of AI ethics values in technology companies. Based on a qualitative analysis of technology workers tasked with integrating AI ethics into product development, we find that workers experience an environment where policies, practices, and outcomes are decoupled. We analyze AI ethics workers as ethics entrepreneurs who work to institutionalize new ethics-related practices within organizations. We show that ethics entrepreneurs face three major barriers to their work. First, they struggle to have ethics prioritized in an environment centered around software product launches. Second, ethics are difficult to quantify in a context where company goals are incentivized by metrics. Third, the frequent reorganization of teams makes it difficult to access knowledge and maintain relationships central to their work. Consequently, individuals take on great personal risk when raising ethics issues, especially when they come from marginalized backgrounds. These findings shed light on complex dynamics of institutional change at technology companies.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 226
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Anderson J., 2020, Many tech experts say digital disruption will hurt democracy
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, The Twenty-First Century Firm
  • [3] Contextualizing the ethics of algorithms: A socio-professional approach
    Avnoon, Netta
    Kotliar, Dan M.
    Rivnai-Bahir, Shira
    [J]. NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2024, 26 (10) : 5962 - 5982
  • [4] From Smoke and Mirrors to Walking the Talk: Decoupling in the Contemporary World
    Bromley, Patricia
    Powell, Walter W.
    [J]. ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2012, 6 : 483 - 530
  • [5] Chang A., 2018, The Facebook and Cambridge Analytica scandal, explained with a simple diagram
  • [6] The ethnographer and the algorithm: beyond the black box
    Christin, Angele
    [J]. THEORY AND SOCIETY, 2020, 49 (5-6) : 897 - 918
  • [7] Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice
    Christin, Angele
    [J]. BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2017, 4 (02):
  • [8] Costanza-Chock S., 2022, P 2022 ACM C FAIRN A, P1571, DOI [DOI 10.1145/3531146.3533213, 10.1145/3531146.3533213.URL]
  • [9] DIMAGGIO P.J., 1988, Institutional patterns and organizations: Culture and Environment, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.GEOFORUM.2020.02.013
  • [10] The iron cage revisited - Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields (Reprinted from the American Sociological Association vol 48, pg 147-160, 1983)
    DiMaggio, PJ
    Powell, WW
    [J]. ADVANCES IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, VOL 17, 2000: ECONOMICS MEETS SOCIOLOGY IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2000, 17 : 143 - 166