Keeping them honest? Broad-based employee ownership and earnings management

被引:5
作者
Birkhead, Colin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Willamette Univ, Atkinson Grad Sch Management, Salem, OR USA
[2] Willamette Univ, Atkinson Grad Sch Management, 315 Winter St SE, Salem, OR 97301 USA
关键词
corporate governance; employee ownership; earnings management; ESOPs; information asymmetries; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; STOCK OWNERSHIP; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP; EQUITY INCENTIVES; FIRM PERFORMANCE; AGENCY; ATTITUDES; QUALITY; ACCRUALS;
D O I
10.1111/corg.12554
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Research Question/IssueDoes broad-based employee ownership limit accrual earnings management? Research Findings/InsightsI run a series of random effect and fixed effect models on a sample of S & P 1500 firms between 2008 and 2019 to show that managers at employee-owned firms manipulate earnings less than managers at nonemployee-owned firms. My findings suggest that employee ownership enhances financial transparency and limits the opportunities for managers to misrepresent firm performance. Theoretical/Academic ImplicationsThis study develops and tests theory on employee ownership as a form of internal corporate governance. Equity incentives for executives are typically thought to reduce agency costs. The findings here suggest awarding equity incentives broadly, in which the majority of employees receive equity stakes, may be a more effective method of reducing agency costs. Practitioner/Policy ImplicationsEarnings management and intentional financial misreporting are often a result of siloed information within firms. Broad-based employee ownership is generally associated with enhanced information flows through greater mutual monitoring and information sharing. Corporate governors interested in reducing managerial malfeasance may find that widely awarding equity to employees is more effective than financially incentivizing individual managers to act in the firm's interests.
引用
收藏
页码:500 / 521
页数:22
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Units of measurement and the inverse hyperbolic sine transformation [J].
Aihounton, Ghislain B. D. ;
Henningsen, Arne .
ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL, 2021, 24 (02) :334-351
[2]  
ALCHIAN AA, 1972, AM ECON REV, V62, P777
[3]  
Aldrich HowardE., 2020, ORG EVOLVING, VThird
[4]   FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY [J].
ALTMAN, EI .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1968, 23 (04) :589-609
[5]   A Self-Fulfilling Cycle of Coercive Surveillance: Workers' Invisibility Practices and Managerial Justification [J].
Anteby, Michel ;
Chan, Curtis K. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2018, 29 (02) :247-263
[6]   Chief Executive Officer Equity Incentives and Accounting Irregularities [J].
Armstrong, Christopher S. ;
Jagolinzer, Alan D. ;
Larcker, David F. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (02) :225-271
[7]   Employee stock ownership and the cost of capital [J].
Aubert, Nicolas ;
Kern, Alexander ;
Hollandts, Xavier .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2017, 41 :67-78
[8]   Employee ownership: A theoretical and empirical investigation of management entrenchment vs. reward management [J].
Aubert, Nicolas ;
Garnotel, Guillaume ;
Lapied, Andre ;
Rousseau, Patrick .
ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2014, 40 :423-434
[9]   Do Employee-Owned Firms Produce More Positive Employee Behavioural Outcomes? If Not Why Not? A British-Spanish Comparative Analysis [J].
Basterretxea, Imanol ;
Storey, John .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, 2018, 56 (02) :292-319
[10]   CEO incentives and earnings management [J].
Bergstresser, Daniel ;
Philippon, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 80 (03) :511-529