Effect of gestures and smartphone sizes on user experience of text input methods

被引:1
作者
Li, Ying [1 ,2 ]
You, Fangzhou [3 ]
Ji, Ming [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Rui Jie [1 ,2 ]
You, Xuqun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shaanxi Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Xian 710062, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Shaanxi Prov Key Lab Behav & Cognit Neurosci, Xian 710062, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Loughborough Univ, Design Sch, Loughborough LE11 3TU, Leics, England
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Smartphone; Text input method; Gesture; Smartphone size; Usability; THUMB MOTOR-PERFORMANCE; TOUCH SCREEN PERFORMANCE; MUSCLE-ACTIVITY; PHYSIOLOGICAL REACTION; ENTRY; POSTURE; PERCEPTION; USABILITY; RESPONSES; DISPLAY;
D O I
10.1007/s10209-021-00863-7
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the effect of gestures (text entry with thumbs of both hands and one-thumb text entry) and smartphone sizes (4.7, 5, and 5.5 inches) on the user experience during text entry with QWERTY and T9 input methods. Messaging using smartphones has become an important communication tool. Users change their gestures depending on the smartphone use context. Many different smartphone sizes are available, but suggestions from an ergonomic perspective are missing. Twenty-four participants used either two-thumb text entry or one-thumb text entry, using both QWERTY and T9. A different group of 24 participants entered text using QWERTY and T9 on smartphones with different sizes. Their performance, subjective rating, and physiological reactions were analyzed. Two-thumb text entry was more effective than one-thumb text entry. Better user experiences were achieved by using QWERTY for two-thumb text entry, by using T9 for one-thumb text entry, and by using QWERTY with a 5-inch smartphone compared with using a 4.7-inch smartphone. Using QWERTY with a 5.5-inch smartphone achieved a higher speed than using a 4.7-inch smartphone. Users who used T9 with a 5-inch smartphone achieved a better user experience than if using a 5.5-inch smartphone. QWERTY is more suitable for two-thumb text entry, while T9 is more suitable for one-thumb text entry. Different smartphone sizes affect the use of input methods. This study provides a reference for smartphone text input interface designers.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 554
页数:18
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, P 12 INT C HUMAN COM, DOI [10.1145/1851600.1851619, DOI 10.1145/1851600.18516192]
[2]  
Azenkot S., 2012, P 14 INT C HUM COMP, P251, DOI [10.1145/2371574.2371612, DOI 10.1145/2371574.2371612]
[3]   From emotion perception to emotion experience:: Emotions evoked by pictures and classical music [J].
Baumgartner, T ;
Esslen, M ;
Jäncke, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 60 (01) :34-43
[4]   A STUDY OF AFFECTIVE RESPONSIVENESS IN A LIE-DETECTION SITUATION [J].
BLOCK, J .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1957, 55 (01) :11-15
[5]   Introduction to the special issue on Lifestyle and Mobile Communication [J].
Bouwman, Harry ;
de Reuver, Mark ;
Sell, Anna ;
Walden, Pirkko .
TELEMATICS AND INFORMATICS, 2014, 31 (02) :V-VI
[6]  
Brooke J., 1996, Usability Evaluation in Industry, V189, P4
[7]  
Castellucci, 2013, P INT C MULT HUM COM
[8]  
Castellucci S., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, P1507
[9]   Virtual Sliding QWERTY: A new text entry method for smartwatches using Tap-N-Drag [J].
Cha, Jae-Min ;
Choi, Eunjung ;
Lim, Jihyoun .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2015, 51 :263-272
[10]   Touch screen performance by individuals with and without motor control disabilities [J].
Chen, Karen B. ;
Savage, Anne B. ;
Chourasia, Amrish O. ;
Wiegmann, Douglas A. ;
Sesto, Mary E. .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 2013, 44 (02) :297-302