Augmented reality for orthopedic and maxillofacial oncological surgery: a systematic review focusing on both clinical and technical aspects

被引:1
|
作者
Nasir, Naqash [1 ,2 ]
Cercenelli, Laura [3 ]
Tarsitano, Achille [1 ,4 ]
Marcelli, Emanuela [3 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Oral & Maxillofacial Surg Unit, Bologna, Italy
[2] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Orthoped & Traumatol Dept, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Med & Surg Sci, Lab Bioengn, eDIMES Lab, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Maxillofacial Surg Unit, Bologna, Italy
关键词
augmented reality; mixed reality; orthopedics oncology; maxillofacial oncology; surgery; tracking; MIXED REALITY; STEREOTACTIC NAVIGATION; TUMOR; RECONSTRUCTION; FEASIBILITY; PLACEMENT; RESECTION; ACCURACY; GUIDE; FLAP;
D O I
10.3389/fbioe.2023.1276338
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This systematic review offers an overview on clinical and technical aspects of augmented reality (AR) applications in orthopedic and maxillofacial oncological surgery. The review also provides a summary of the included articles with objectives and major findings for both specialties. The search was conducted on PubMed/Medline and Scopus databases and returned on 31 May 2023. All articles of the last 10 years found by keywords augmented reality, mixed reality, maxillofacial oncology and orthopedic oncology were considered in this study. For orthopedic oncology, a total of 93 articles were found and only 9 articles were selected following the defined inclusion criteria. These articles were subclassified further based on study type, AR display type, registration/tracking modality and involved anatomical region. Similarly, out of 958 articles on maxillofacial oncology, 27 articles were selected for this review and categorized further in the same manner. The main outcomes reported for both specialties are related to registration error (i.e., how the virtual objects displayed in AR appear in the wrong position relative to the real environment) and surgical accuracy (i.e., resection error) obtained under AR navigation. However, meta-analysis on these outcomes was not possible due to data heterogenicity. Despite having certain limitations related to the still immature technology, we believe that AR is a viable tool to be used in oncological surgeries of orthopedic and maxillofacial field, especially if it is integrated with an external navigation system to improve accuracy. It is emphasized further to conduct more research and pre-clinical testing before the wide adoption of AR in clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery - A systematic review
    Jud, Lukas
    Fotouhi, Javad
    Andronic, Octavian
    Aichmair, Alexander
    Osgood, Greg
    Navab, Nassir
    Farshad, Mazda
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [2] Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    De Salvatore, Sergio
    Candela, Vincenzo
    Zollo, Giuliano
    Calabrese, Giovanni
    Fioravanti, Sara
    Giannone, Lucia
    Marchetti, Anna
    De Marinis, Maria Grazia
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [3] Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery – A systematic review
    Lukas Jud
    Javad Fotouhi
    Octavian Andronic
    Alexander Aichmair
    Greg Osgood
    Nassir Navab
    Mazda Farshad
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21
  • [4] Image Overlay Surgery Based on Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review
    Perez-Pachon, Laura
    Poyade, Matthieu
    Lowe, Terry
    Groning, Flora
    BIOMEDICAL VISUALISATION, VOL 8, 2020, 1260 : 175 - 195
  • [5] Augmented Reality in Orthopedic Surgery and Its Application in Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
    Rossi, Stefano Marco Paolo
    Mancino, Fabio
    Sangaletti, Rudy
    Perticarini, Loris
    Lucenti, Ludovico
    Benazzo, Francesco
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (10):
  • [6] Augmented reality navigation in spine surgery: a systematic review
    Burstrom, Gustav
    Persson, Oscar
    Edstrom, Erik
    Elmi-Terander, Adrian
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2021, 163 (03) : 843 - 852
  • [7] Intraoperative augmented reality with heads-up displays in maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review of the literature and a classification of relevant technologies
    Bosc, R.
    Fitoussi, A.
    Hersant, B.
    Dao, T. -H.
    Meningaud, J. -P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 48 (01) : 132 - 138
  • [8] Intra-operative applications of augmented reality in glioma surgery: a systematic review
    Ragnhildstveit, Anya
    Li, Chao
    Zimmerman, Mackenzie H.
    Mamalakis, Michail
    Curry, Victoria N.
    Holle, Willis
    Baig, Noor
    Uguralp, Ahmet K.
    Alkhani, Layth
    Oguz-Uguralp, Zeliha
    Romero-Garcia, Rafael
    Suckling, John
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [9] Utility of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Sumdani, Hasan
    Aguilar-Salinas, Pedro
    Avila, Mauricio J.
    Barber, Samuel R.
    Dumont, Travis
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 161 : E8 - E17
  • [10] Augmented Reality in Dentistry: Enhancing Precision in Clinical Procedures-A Systematic Review
    Puleio, Francesco
    Tosco, Vincenzo
    Pirri, Rosario
    Simeone, Michele
    Monterubbianesi, Riccardo
    Lo Giudice, Giorgio
    Lo Giudice, Roberto
    CLINICS AND PRACTICE, 2024, 14 (06) : 2267 - 2283