Integrating public perceptions of proximity and quality in the modelling of urban green space access

被引:12
作者
Phillips, Amy [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Plastara, Dimitra [3 ]
Khan, Ahmed Z. [2 ]
Canters, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Dept Geog, Cartog & GIS Res Grp, B-1050 Lxelles, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Bldg Architecture & Town Planning BATir Dept, B-1050 Lxelles, Belgium
[3] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Spatial Planning & Dev, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[4] Pl Laan 2, B-1050 Lxelles, Belgium
关键词
Urban green spaces; Urban green space accessibility; Urban green space quality; PPGIS; Green space equity; Environmental justice; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; HEALTH-CARE; ACCESSIBILITY; PARKS; CITIES; DISPARITIES; ATTRACTIVENESS; PREFERENCES;
D O I
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104875
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Access to urban green space (UGS) is associated with a number of physical and social benefits. Recognizing the importance of UGS access for people's wellbeing, several methods have been proposed to model UGS accessibility and highlight areas underserviced by UGS. However, existing methodologies have several limitations. Models often make use of universal, normative maximum travel distances, which may not reflect the distances people actually travel to reach UGS they regularly visit. Additionally, many of these analyses do not consider UGS quality, which will largely influence use and experience of these spaces and may act as a pull factor affecting the distance people are willing to travel to visit a UGS. Those methods that do integrate quality often rely on proxies, such as size or number of amenities, and fail to consider perceived quality. To address these limitations, we propose a methodology that integrates user perception and the actual distance people are prepared to travel into a quality-accessibility (QA) analysis applied at the building block scale. Information on travel distance and quality are gathered from a public participation GIS survey conducted in the Brussels Capital Region. The results of the analysis highlight inequalities in access to specific, essential UGS experiences throughout the region. Insights provided by this analysis can help planners prioritize interventions to improve access to experiences provided by UGS in parts of the city where interventions are most needed.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 74 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human wellbeing: synthesis
  • [2] Arnberger Arne, 2006, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, V4, P135, DOI 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.004
  • [3] Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK
    Barbosa, Olga
    Tratalos, Jamie A.
    Armsworth, Paul R.
    Davies, Richard G.
    Fuller, Richard A.
    Johnson, Pat
    Gaston, Kevin J.
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2007, 83 (2-3) : 187 - 195
  • [4] The significance of parks to physical activity and public health - A conceptual model
    Bedimo-Rung, AL
    Mowen, AJ
    Cohen, DA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 28 (02) : 159 - 168
  • [5] Preferences for cultural urban ecosystem services: Comparing attitudes, perception, and use
    Bertram, Christine
    Rehdanz, Katrin
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 12 : 187 - 199
  • [6] Classification of institutional barriers affecting the availability, accessibility and attractiveness of urban green spaces
    Biernacka, Magdalena
    Kronenberg, Jakub
    [J]. URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING, 2018, 36 : 22 - 33
  • [7] Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: A review and evaluation
    Brown, Greg
    Fagerholm, Nora
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2015, 13 : 119 - 133
  • [8] Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research
    Brown, Greg
    Kytta, Marketta
    [J]. APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 46 : 122 - 136
  • [9] Brussels Environment, 2018, Brussels green city, city full of nature-City plan
  • [10] Brussels Environment, 2012, La foret de soignes